perl-devel January 2007

perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

4 participants
47 discussions

[Bug 180767] Invalid rpm group: Applications/CPAN
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Jan '07

17 Jan '07

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Invalid rpm group: Applications/CPAN https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180767 Christian.Iseli(a)licr.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO CC| |Christian.Iseli(a)licr.org ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli(a)licr.org 2007-01-17 18:18 EST ------- FC3 and FC4 have now been EOL'd. Please check the ticket against a current Fedora release, and either adjust the release number, or close it if appropriate. Thanks. Your friendly BZ janitor :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2007-01-17
by Fedora Koji Build System 17 Jan '07

17 Jan '07

This is an automated mail created by an experimental script. Your following packages in the repository contain broken dependencies: package: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel - 0.2700-1.fc7.i386 from fedora-extras-development-i386 unresolved deps: perl(warnnigs) package: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel - 0.2700-1.fc7.ppc from fedora-extras-development-ppc unresolved deps: perl(warnnigs) package: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel - 0.2700-1.fc7.x86_64 from fedora-extras-development-x86_64 unresolved deps: perl(warnnigs)

3 2

[Bug 221472] New: upgrade to 1.12 release
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jan '07

08 Jan '07

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221472 Summary: upgrade to 1.12 release Product: Fedora Extras Version: fc6 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl-Finance-Quote AssignedTo: notting(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: stephan.ebelt(a)gmx.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Description of problem: the Finance::Quote project has released version 1.12 some time ago. The current RPM package contains version 1.11 were many URLs/modules are outdated meanwhile cause websites have changed - thus its not really useful anymore. By any chance, please upgrade to v1.12. thanks, Stephan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 1

[Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Jan '07

03 Jan '07

1 0

[Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Jan '07

03 Jan '07

1 0

[Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Jan '07

03 Jan '07

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 ------- Additional Comments From paul(a)city-fan.org 2007-01-03 06:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > What's the status on this review? The thing that was holding it up originally was the license. This has been fixed by a new upstream release (0.67) which states that it's licensed under the same terms as perl itself (i.e. GPL or Artistic). In Comment #21, Robin was going to check whether Bug #73921 and Bug #129724 were still present before going ahead with owning the package in Extras, I have created an updated SRPM for 0.67 that brings the package much more into line with the way perl modules are normally written for Extras. This addresses the directory ownership issue of Bug #73921. I haven't checked the status of Bug #129724 but that looks to me more like an issue for upstream rather than a packaging issue, and I don't think that should block the package from being imported. Updated SRPM: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-RPM2/perl-RPM2-0.67-1.src.rpm Updated Spec: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-RPM2/perl-RPM2.spec Robin, what's the state of play for this package from your point of view? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jan '07

02 Jan '07

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 sundaram(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram(a)redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From sundaram(a)redhat.com 2007-01-02 17:14 EST ------- What's the status on this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

perl-devel January 2007