perl-devel November 2007

perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

14 participants
125 discussions

[Bug 398801] New: perl-Config-General-2.37 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Oct '08

16 Oct '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398801 Summary: perl-Config-General-2.37 is available Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/FEver OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Config-General AssignedTo: ville.skytta(a)iki.fi ReportedBy: fevapp(a)o2.pl QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com perl-Config-General-2.37 is already available. Repo version is 2.33. Please update the package. If you have any questions or suggestions related to Fever, feel free to write them in this bug or have a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/FEver Don't send any messages to fevapp at o2.pl please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 5

CPAN -> fedora mapping update!
by Chris Weyl 10 Aug '08

10 Aug '08

Hey all -- I put some additional work into the CPAN->Fedora mapping tools over Thanksgiving break... * version info is now pulled from koji * version in testing, if available, is published * versions pre F-7 are not pulled (working to fix this) * data is now stored in a backend db * upstream-querying is now modular, so querying other upstreams (e.g. for non-perl) should just be a matter of writing the correct backend extension and providing a way to determine it should be used against a package. The page is still up out at http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/perl/. Note I consider the page a stop-gap; next time I get some cycles I'll probably give Catalyst a whirl and see if I can't make something nice and dynamic to present it :) Note also there are CSS issues; I've asked the infrastructure list to set me right. I'm also looking to leverage a greater integration with koji and the packagedb as opportunities present themselves. The code is out under the camelus hosted project[1] It's still early, mildly slap-dash and requires a bunch of modules not yet available in Fedora (a number of MooseX ones and DBIx::Class spring to mind). Patches / comments / collaboration quite welcome :) -Chris [1] https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/camelus/ -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia

3 6

[Bug 251960] New: perl-File-Which for EPEL?
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Jul '08

21 Jul '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251960 Summary: perl-File-Which for EPEL? Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: medium Component: perl-File-Which AssignedTo: jpo(a)di.uminho.pt ReportedBy: rnorwood(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Hi - can I get perl-File-Which for EPEL? I need it for bug #250493 . Or I'd be happy to own it if you don't want to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 5

[Bug 245225] New: perl-GD build warning perl-GD-2.35-2.fc6.src.rpm
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Jul '08

21 Jul '08

1 6

[Bug 275271] New: cpan2rpm deals badly with letters in version numbers
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Jun '08

16 Jun '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275271 Summary: cpan2rpm deals badly with letters in version numbers Product: Fedora Version: f7 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: medium Component: cpan2rpm AssignedTo: ghenry(a)suretecsystems.com ReportedBy: marcos.marado(a)sonae.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Description of problem: cpan2rpm deals badly with letters in version numbers. This makes, for instance, cpan2rpm SOAP::Lite to think that 0.60a is the latest version, instead of 0.69. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): cpan2rpm-2.028-2.fc6 How reproducible: Allways. Steps to Reproduce: 1. yum install cpan2rpm 2. cpan2rpm SOAP::Lite 3. Check the version of the generated RPM Actual results: A RPM from SOAP::Lite 0.60a is generated. Expected results: A RPM from SOAP::Lite 0.69 generated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 3

[Bug 235553] New: perl.ppc64 @INC problem, perl.ppc conflicts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jun '08

09 Jun '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235553 Summary: perl.ppc64 @INC problem, perl.ppc conflicts Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6 Platform: ppc64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: perl AssignedTo: rnorwood(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: christopher.murtagh(a)gmail.com QAContact: dkl(a)redhat.com CC: dwmw2@redhat.com,fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Description of problem: perl.ppc64's @INC doesn't include paths where most perl binary packages are, perl-BerkeleyDB.ppc for example. [root@mybox~]# locate BerkeleyDB.pm /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/ppc-linux-thread-multi/BerkeleyDB.pm Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): current (from base) How reproducible: 100%. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install perl.ppc, perl.ppc64, install perl-BerkelyDB. 2. Then perl -e 'use BerkeleyDB; exit;' 3. There is no step 3... heh, there is no step 3. Actual results: Can't locate BerkeleyDB.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/ppc64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/ppc64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/ppc64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/ppc64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/ppc64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7/ppc64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/ppc64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/ppc64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/ppc64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8) at /usr/sbin/postgrey line 14. Expected results: Successful compilation and exit without error. Additional info: The workaround was to yum erase perl.ppc64, fetch the perl.ppc rpm and rpm -i --replacepkgs --replacefiles (because they both dump perl in /usr/bin/perl, so removing the perl.ppc64 still left the 64 bit binary). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 7

[Bug 198399] New: Package perl lacks IPv6 support
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jun '08

02 Jun '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198399 Summary: Package perl lacks IPv6 support Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl AssignedTo: jvdias(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: pvrabec(a)redhat.com QAContact: dkl(a)redhat.com CC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com,mbacovsk@redhat.com This bug was reported automaticaly in connection with IPv6 project. Our aim is to support IPv6 in all Fedora Core packages so FC6 and RHEL5 will be ready for IPv6. This package seems to lack IPv6 support as is illustrated in attached log. Here follows part of scanning log (grep -r F_INET *)/up to 30 lines: /perl-5.8.8/pp_sys.c:2369:#if defined (HAS_SOCKETPAIR) || (defined (HAS_SOCKET) && defined(SOCK_DGRAM) && defined(AF_INET) && defined(PF_INET)) /perl-5.8.8/pp_sys.c:2742: if (((struct sockaddr *)SvPVX_const(sv))->sa_family == AF_INET && /perl-5.8.8/vms/sockadapt.c:122: if (addr->sa_family == AF_INET && /perl-5.8.8/vms/sockadapt.h:115:#ifndef AF_INET /perl-5.8.8/vms/sockadapt.h:116:# define AF_INET 2 /perl-5.8.8/util.c:4166:#if !defined(HAS_SOCKETPAIR) && defined(HAS_SOCKET) && defined(AF_INET) && defined(PF_INET) && defined(SOCK_DGRAM) && defined(HAS_SELECT) /perl-5.8.8/util.c:4185: sockets[i] = PerlSock_socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, PF_INET); /perl-5.8.8/util.c:4189: addresses[i].sin_family = AF_INET; /perl-5.8.8/util.c:4311:#if !defined(HAS_SOCKETPAIR) && defined(HAS_SOCKET) && defined(AF_INET) && defined(PF_INET) /perl-5.8.8/util.c:4342: listener = PerlSock_socket(AF_INET, type, 0); /perl-5.8.8/util.c:4346: listen_addr.sin_family = AF_INET; /perl-5.8.8/util.c:4355: connector = PerlSock_socket(AF_INET, type, 0); /perl-5.8.8/mpeix/mpeix.c:511: /* AF_INET socket */ /perl-5.8.8/mpeix/mpeix.c:713: if (address->sa_family == AF_INET /perl-5.8.8/mpeix/mpeix.c:724: if (address->sa_family == AF_INET) /perl-5.8.8/mpeix/mpeix.c:750: && address->sa_family == AF_INET /perl-5.8.8/mpeix/mpeix.c:799: result = 30000; /* AF_INET sock max */ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 3

[Bug 237025] New: perl-Text-CSV_XS: EPEL branches?
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 May '08

22 May '08

1 2

[Bug 242249] New: syntax error in perl5db.pl
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 May '08

10 May '08

1 9

[Bug 228043] New: ??? 64bit sa-update.1 manpage timestamp differs from 32bit?
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 May '08

07 May '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228043 Summary: ??? 64bit sa-update.1 manpage timestamp differs from 32bit? Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: spamassassin AssignedTo: wtogami(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: wtogami(a)redhat.com CC: fedora-perl-devel- list@redhat.com,felicity@kluge.net,jm@jmason.org,parkerm @pobox.com,reg+redhat@sidney.com,wtogami@redhat.com Odd minor problem... low priority. /usr/share/man/man1/sa-update.1.gz differs by the following unidiff between the 32bit and 64bit architecture builds of spamassassin. --- 32 2007-02-09 12:46:19.000000000 -0500 +++ 64 2007-02-09 12:46:10.000000000 -0500 @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ .\" ======================================================================== .\" .IX Title "SA-UPDATE 1" -.TH SA-UPDATE 1 "2006-07-30" "perl v5.8.5" "User Contributed Perl Documentation" +.TH SA-UPDATE 1 "2007-01-22" "perl v5.8.5" "User Contributed Perl Documentation" .SH "NAME" sa\-update \- automate SpamAssassin rule updates .SH "SYNOPSIS" This appears to be the only difference in version 3.1.7. Notice that the 32bit version retained the original source timestamp, while the 64bit version somehow decided to differ in this behavior by changing the timestamp to the build date. The above example is 3.1.7 built on RHEL4, but this persists through perl-5.8.8 in FC7 too. While this appears to create a multilib conflict, in practice this is not a real problem because spamassassin is based on perl, and we don't ship both archs in a multilib distribution. This bug is merely to figure out *why* it is behaving in this strange way betweeen 32bit and 64bit builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 7

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

perl-devel November 2007