[Bug 427326] New: testsuite failure
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427326
Summary: testsuite failure
Product: Fedora
Version: 8
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime
AssignedTo: steve(a)silug.org
ReportedBy: rc040203(a)freenet.de
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Trying to address BZ 419631 by adding BR: perl(Test::More) to this package's
spec triggers a testsuite breakdown:
...
+ make test
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0,
'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t
t/001_load...............ok
t/002_dates..............ok
t/003_every..............ok
t/004_locale_defaults....Can't call method "year" on an undefined value at
t/004_locale_defaults.t line 45.
# Looks like you planned 48 tests but only ran 36.
# Looks like your test died just after 36.
dubious
Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00)
DIED. FAILED tests 37-48
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime-1_0700-4 with FC8 or FC9
[Breakdown does not occur for fc7]
Steps to Reproduce:
Build spec in Fedora's CVS with BR: perl(Test::More) added for FC8 or FC9
Actual results:
Cf. above. Building the package fails.
Additional info:
Upgrading the package to perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.0702.tgz seems to help.
If I interpret the tarball's Changes correctly, this issue had been fixed in 1.0701.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 12 months
[Bug 242249] New: syntax error in perl5db.pl
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242249
Summary: syntax error in perl5db.pl
Product: Fedora Core
Version: fc6
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: perl
AssignedTo: rnorwood(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: ihok(a)hotmail.com
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Unmatched right curly bracket at (eval 48)[/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/perl5db.pl:628]
line 5, at end of line
syntax error at (eval 48)[/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/perl5db.pl:628] line 5, near ";
}"
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-5.8.8-10
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 12 months
[Bug 228043] New: ??? 64bit sa-update.1 manpage timestamp differs from 32bit?
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228043
Summary: ??? 64bit sa-update.1 manpage timestamp differs from
32bit?
Product: Fedora Core
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: spamassassin
AssignedTo: wtogami(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: wtogami(a)redhat.com
CC: fedora-perl-devel-
list@redhat.com,felicity@kluge.net,jm(a)jmason.org,parkerm
@pobox.com,reg+redhat@sidney.com,wtogami(a)redhat.com
Odd minor problem... low priority.
/usr/share/man/man1/sa-update.1.gz differs by the following unidiff between the
32bit and 64bit architecture builds of spamassassin.
--- 32 2007-02-09 12:46:19.000000000 -0500
+++ 64 2007-02-09 12:46:10.000000000 -0500
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@
.\" ========================================================================
.\"
.IX Title "SA-UPDATE 1"
-.TH SA-UPDATE 1 "2006-07-30" "perl v5.8.5" "User Contributed Perl Documentation"
+.TH SA-UPDATE 1 "2007-01-22" "perl v5.8.5" "User Contributed Perl Documentation"
.SH "NAME"
sa\-update \- automate SpamAssassin rule updates
.SH "SYNOPSIS"
This appears to be the only difference in version 3.1.7. Notice that the 32bit
version retained the original source timestamp, while the 64bit version somehow
decided to differ in this behavior by changing the timestamp to the build date.
The above example is 3.1.7 built on RHEL4, but this persists through perl-5.8.8
in FC7 too.
While this appears to create a multilib conflict, in practice this is not a real
problem because spamassassin is based on perl, and we don't ship both archs in a
multilib distribution.
This bug is merely to figure out *why* it is behaving in this strange way
betweeen 32bit and 64bit builds.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
16 years
[Bug 232481] New: EPEL branches: a couple of perl packages from fedora.us
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232481
Summary: EPEL branches: a couple of perl packages from fedora.us
Product: Fedora Extras
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: perl-pmtools
AssignedTo: jpo(a)di.uminho.pt
ReportedBy: jpo(a)di.uminho.pt
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Branches: EPEL4 and EPEL5
Perl packages to branch:
* perl-pmtools
* perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder
* perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS
Note:
* Please create the EPEL branchs from the devel or FC-6
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
16 years
[Bug 227622] New: Unable to pass argument to sa-update
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227622
Summary: Unable to pass argument to sa-update
Product: Fedora Core
Version: fc6
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: spamassassin
AssignedTo: wtogami(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: milan.kerslager(a)pslib.cz
CC: fedora-perl-devel-
list@redhat.com,felicity@kluge.net,jm(a)jmason.org,parkerm
@pobox.com,reg+redhat@sidney.com,wtogami(a)redhat.com
As there is a standartized cron script now to utilize sa-update, please allow
pass arguments to this command. Use /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin to set
$SAUPDATEOPT, and use this in /usr/share/spamassassin/sa-update.cron:
[...]
if [ -f /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin ]; then
. /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin
fi
/usr/bin/sa-update $SAUPDATEOPT
These argument are necessary to be able to alter sa-update default behaviour.
Also I dislike output (echo commands with mailing to root by cron daemon) in
this file even there is no (error) output. Please remove it along with tee
commad and redirection of output in the file /etc/cron.d/sa-update. Unix-like
style is to report nothing when there is no error.
There is also a possibility to add -D (--debug [area=n,...]) argument to the
sa-update to get output mailed if one need it.
Thank you.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
16 years
[Bug 228688] New: invalid syntax results in interpreter seg fault
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228688
Summary: invalid syntax results in interpreter seg fault
Product: Fedora Core
Version: fc6
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: normal
Component: perl
AssignedTo: rnorwood(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: robert.haas(a)tekconnect.com
QAContact: dkl(a)redhat.com
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Attempting to execute the following code produces a segmentation fault:
sub frob {
my ($r) = @_;
sub {
. 3;
};
}
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-5.8.8-10
How reproducible: Run the code above.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Save the code above in a text file (6 lines) called "oops".
2. Type "perl < oops"
Actual results:
Seg fault
Expected results:
Syntax error
Additional info:
None
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
16 years
[Bug 271341] New: IPC::Shareable fails to build on RHEL/CentOS 5
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=271341
Summary: IPC::Shareable fails to build on RHEL/CentOS 5
Product: Fedora
Version: f7
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: medium
Component: perl-IPC-Shareable
AssignedTo: jpo(a)di.uminho.pt
ReportedBy: matt(a)bodgit-n-scarper.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
(Not quite sure what components this should ultimately be filed under, Fedora 7
at least has the perl-IPC-Shareable component)
Description of problem:
I'm trying to rebuild the FC6/F7 perl-IPC-Shareable Perl module for CentOS 5
x86_64 (like the EPEL RPMs), and it stalls as part of the "make test" phase:
...
+ make test
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0,
'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t
t/00base......ok
t/05sv........ok
t/10av........ok
t/15hv........ok
t/20ref.......ok
t/25ipc.......ok
t/30lock......ok
t/35clean.....ok
t/36ipcav.....ok
t/38ipchv.....ok 1/5
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-IPC-Shareable-0.60-3.fc6.src.rpm
How reproducible:
Always.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpmbuild --rebuild perl-IPC-Shareable-0.60-3.fc6.src.rpm
Actual results:
Stalls at 1/5 in the 38ipchv tests
Expected results:
Should complete cleanly with no errors
Additional info:
Build host is fully updated CentOS 5 x86_64 installation. Build completes
correctly on a Fedora 7 installation.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
16 years
[Bug 242065] New: perl-CGI-Session is not available in FE6
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242065
Summary: perl-CGI-Session is not available in FE6
Product: Fedora Extras
Version: fc6
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: perl-CGI-Session
AssignedTo: andreas(a)bawue.net
ReportedBy: jeff(a)ocjtech.us
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
perl-CGI-Session is not available in Fedora Extras 6.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum install perl-CGI-Session
Actual results:
# rpm -q perl-CGI-Session
package perl-CGI-Session is not installed
# yum install perl-CGI-Session
Loading "installonlyn" plugin
Setting up Install Process
Setting up repositories
Reading repository metadata in from local files
Parsing package install arguments
Nothing to do
Expected results:
perl-CGI-Session gets installed.
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
16 years
[Bug 439644] New: New perl-Catalyst-Runtime conflicts with existing perl-Catalyst-Manual
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439644
Summary: New perl-Catalyst-Runtime conflicts with existing perl-
Catalyst-Manual
Product: Fedora
Version: 8
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: perl-Catalyst-Runtime
AssignedTo: cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu
ReportedBy: kahlil(a)internode.on.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Well, the following says it all:
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Catalyst/Manual.pm from install of
perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.7012-2.fc8.noarch conflicts with file from package
perl-Catalyst-Manual-5.700701-2.fc8.noarch
Perhaps there is a newer perl-Catalyst-Manual that has not hit my repository yet,
in which case there probably should be some dependency logic in there somewhere.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
16 years
[Bug 431478] New: perl-Class-MethodMaker not available in EPEL
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431478
Summary: perl-Class-MethodMaker not available in EPEL
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: perl-Class-MethodMaker
AssignedTo: dgregor(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: xavier(a)bachelot.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
perl-Class-MethodMaker is not available for EL-4 nor EL-5, altough the branches
have been created. Could you please rebuild it at least for EL-5 ? I tested to
rebuild the SRPM from F8 in EL-5, it rebuilds fine so it should be straight
forward to do.
Thanks in advance.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
16 years