[Bug 441646] New: RFE: perl-Text-CSV_XS for EPEL
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441646
Summary: RFE: perl-Text-CSV_XS for EPEL
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: perl-Text-CSV_XS
AssignedTo: skasal(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: xavier(a)bachelot.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-
list@redhat.com,mmaslano@redhat.com,rnorwood(a)redhat.com
Could you please branch and build perl-Text-CSV_XS for EL4 and EL5 please ?
Regards,
Xavier
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 10 months
[Bug 198399] New: Package perl lacks IPv6 support
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198399
Summary: Package perl lacks IPv6 support
Product: Fedora Core
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: perl
AssignedTo: jvdias(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: pvrabec(a)redhat.com
QAContact: dkl(a)redhat.com
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com,mbacovsk(a)redhat.com
This bug was reported automaticaly in connection with IPv6 project.
Our aim is to support IPv6 in all Fedora Core packages so FC6 and RHEL5 will be ready for IPv6.
This package seems to lack IPv6 support as is illustrated in attached log.
Here follows part of scanning log (grep -r F_INET *)/up to 30 lines:
/perl-5.8.8/pp_sys.c:2369:#if defined (HAS_SOCKETPAIR) || (defined (HAS_SOCKET) && defined(SOCK_DGRAM) && defined(AF_INET) && defined(PF_INET))
/perl-5.8.8/pp_sys.c:2742: if (((struct sockaddr *)SvPVX_const(sv))->sa_family == AF_INET &&
/perl-5.8.8/vms/sockadapt.c:122: if (addr->sa_family == AF_INET &&
/perl-5.8.8/vms/sockadapt.h:115:#ifndef AF_INET
/perl-5.8.8/vms/sockadapt.h:116:# define AF_INET 2
/perl-5.8.8/util.c:4166:#if !defined(HAS_SOCKETPAIR) && defined(HAS_SOCKET) && defined(AF_INET) && defined(PF_INET) && defined(SOCK_DGRAM) && defined(HAS_SELECT)
/perl-5.8.8/util.c:4185: sockets[i] = PerlSock_socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, PF_INET);
/perl-5.8.8/util.c:4189: addresses[i].sin_family = AF_INET;
/perl-5.8.8/util.c:4311:#if !defined(HAS_SOCKETPAIR) && defined(HAS_SOCKET) && defined(AF_INET) && defined(PF_INET)
/perl-5.8.8/util.c:4342: listener = PerlSock_socket(AF_INET, type, 0);
/perl-5.8.8/util.c:4346: listen_addr.sin_family = AF_INET;
/perl-5.8.8/util.c:4355: connector = PerlSock_socket(AF_INET, type, 0);
/perl-5.8.8/mpeix/mpeix.c:511: /* AF_INET socket */
/perl-5.8.8/mpeix/mpeix.c:713: if (address->sa_family == AF_INET
/perl-5.8.8/mpeix/mpeix.c:724: if (address->sa_family == AF_INET)
/perl-5.8.8/mpeix/mpeix.c:750: && address->sa_family == AF_INET
/perl-5.8.8/mpeix/mpeix.c:799: result = 30000; /* AF_INET sock max */
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 10 months
[Bug 237025] New: perl-Text-CSV_XS: EPEL branches?
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237025
Summary: perl-Text-CSV_XS: EPEL branches?
Product: Fedora Extras
Version: fc6
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: perl-Text-CSV_XS
AssignedTo: jpo(a)di.uminho.pt
ReportedBy: cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
It would be useful to me to have this package in EPEL... Any chance of EL-4,
EL-5 branches? :)
Review is bug 175898.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 11 months
[Bug 437804] New: Module::CoreList does not support perl version 5.010000
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437804
Summary: Module::CoreList does not support perl version 5.010000
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: cpanspec
AssignedTo: steve(a)silug.org
ReportedBy: rc040203(a)freenet.de
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
cpanspec is broken when being used with perl-5.10 (fc9)
# cpanspec --packager foo -o -s Test
Module::CoreList does not support perl version 5.010000!
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Always.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. cf. above
Expected results:
function.
Additional info:
AFAIS, the culprit is http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=32047
i.e. Module::CoreList's silly versioning.
This breaks cpanspec's "$Module::CoreList::version{$]}" because
in cpanspec $] expands to 5.010000 (trailing zeros),
while the keys in CoreList are floats (They expect 5.01).
Cf. /usr/bin/corelist -v 's output:
$ corelist -v
...
5.01
...
Though I think, the actual bug to be in Module::CoreList, this hack below would
get cpanspec going again:
-- /usr/bin/cpanspec~ 2008-03-17 15:43:41.000000000 +0100
+++ /usr/bin/cpanspec 2008-03-17 15:43:41.000000000 +0100
@@ -563,7 +563,7 @@
}
die "Module::CoreList does not support perl version $]!\n"
- if (!exists($Module::CoreList::version{$]}));
+ if (!exists($Module::CoreList::version{$] + 0 }));
my @args=@ARGV;
my @processed=();
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 11 months
[Bug 438245] New: cpanget calling wget with invalid arguments
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438245
Summary: cpanget calling wget with invalid arguments
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: cpanspec
AssignedTo: steve(a)silug.org
ReportedBy: jik(a)kamens.brookline.ma.us
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
$ cpanget Net::DNS
Cannot specify -r, -p or -N if -O is given.
Usage: wget [OPTION]... [URL]...
$
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 11 months
[Bug 427326] New: testsuite failure
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427326
Summary: testsuite failure
Product: Fedora
Version: 8
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime
AssignedTo: steve(a)silug.org
ReportedBy: rc040203(a)freenet.de
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Trying to address BZ 419631 by adding BR: perl(Test::More) to this package's
spec triggers a testsuite breakdown:
...
+ make test
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0,
'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t
t/001_load...............ok
t/002_dates..............ok
t/003_every..............ok
t/004_locale_defaults....Can't call method "year" on an undefined value at
t/004_locale_defaults.t line 45.
# Looks like you planned 48 tests but only ran 36.
# Looks like your test died just after 36.
dubious
Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00)
DIED. FAILED tests 37-48
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime-1_0700-4 with FC8 or FC9
[Breakdown does not occur for fc7]
Steps to Reproduce:
Build spec in Fedora's CVS with BR: perl(Test::More) added for FC8 or FC9
Actual results:
Cf. above. Building the package fails.
Additional info:
Upgrading the package to perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.0702.tgz seems to help.
If I interpret the tarball's Changes correctly, this issue had been fixed in 1.0701.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 11 months
[Bug 242249] New: syntax error in perl5db.pl
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242249
Summary: syntax error in perl5db.pl
Product: Fedora Core
Version: fc6
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: perl
AssignedTo: rnorwood(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: ihok(a)hotmail.com
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Unmatched right curly bracket at (eval 48)[/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/perl5db.pl:628]
line 5, at end of line
syntax error at (eval 48)[/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/perl5db.pl:628] line 5, near ";
}"
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-5.8.8-10
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 11 months
[Bug 228043] New: ??? 64bit sa-update.1 manpage timestamp differs from 32bit?
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228043
Summary: ??? 64bit sa-update.1 manpage timestamp differs from
32bit?
Product: Fedora Core
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: spamassassin
AssignedTo: wtogami(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: wtogami(a)redhat.com
CC: fedora-perl-devel-
list@redhat.com,felicity@kluge.net,jm(a)jmason.org,parkerm
@pobox.com,reg+redhat@sidney.com,wtogami(a)redhat.com
Odd minor problem... low priority.
/usr/share/man/man1/sa-update.1.gz differs by the following unidiff between the
32bit and 64bit architecture builds of spamassassin.
--- 32 2007-02-09 12:46:19.000000000 -0500
+++ 64 2007-02-09 12:46:10.000000000 -0500
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@
.\" ========================================================================
.\"
.IX Title "SA-UPDATE 1"
-.TH SA-UPDATE 1 "2006-07-30" "perl v5.8.5" "User Contributed Perl Documentation"
+.TH SA-UPDATE 1 "2007-01-22" "perl v5.8.5" "User Contributed Perl Documentation"
.SH "NAME"
sa\-update \- automate SpamAssassin rule updates
.SH "SYNOPSIS"
This appears to be the only difference in version 3.1.7. Notice that the 32bit
version retained the original source timestamp, while the 64bit version somehow
decided to differ in this behavior by changing the timestamp to the build date.
The above example is 3.1.7 built on RHEL4, but this persists through perl-5.8.8
in FC7 too.
While this appears to create a multilib conflict, in practice this is not a real
problem because spamassassin is based on perl, and we don't ship both archs in a
multilib distribution.
This bug is merely to figure out *why* it is behaving in this strange way
betweeen 32bit and 64bit builds.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 11 months
[Bug 232481] New: EPEL branches: a couple of perl packages from fedora.us
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232481
Summary: EPEL branches: a couple of perl packages from fedora.us
Product: Fedora Extras
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: perl-pmtools
AssignedTo: jpo(a)di.uminho.pt
ReportedBy: jpo(a)di.uminho.pt
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Branches: EPEL4 and EPEL5
Perl packages to branch:
* perl-pmtools
* perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder
* perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS
Note:
* Please create the EPEL branchs from the devel or FC-6
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 11 months
[Bug 227622] New: Unable to pass argument to sa-update
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227622
Summary: Unable to pass argument to sa-update
Product: Fedora Core
Version: fc6
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: spamassassin
AssignedTo: wtogami(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: milan.kerslager(a)pslib.cz
CC: fedora-perl-devel-
list@redhat.com,felicity@kluge.net,jm(a)jmason.org,parkerm
@pobox.com,reg+redhat@sidney.com,wtogami(a)redhat.com
As there is a standartized cron script now to utilize sa-update, please allow
pass arguments to this command. Use /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin to set
$SAUPDATEOPT, and use this in /usr/share/spamassassin/sa-update.cron:
[...]
if [ -f /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin ]; then
. /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin
fi
/usr/bin/sa-update $SAUPDATEOPT
These argument are necessary to be able to alter sa-update default behaviour.
Also I dislike output (echo commands with mailing to root by cron daemon) in
this file even there is no (error) output. Please remove it along with tee
commad and redirection of output in the file /etc/cron.d/sa-update. Unix-like
style is to report nothing when there is no error.
There is also a possibility to add -D (--debug [area=n,...]) argument to the
sa-update to get output mailed if one need it.
Thank you.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 11 months