perl-devel February 2009

perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

31 participants
1374 discussions

[Bug 473407] New: Every invocation of "svk" generates the same warning.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Dec '09

18 Dec '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Every invocation of "svk" generates the same warning. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473407 Summary: Every invocation of "svk" generates the same warning. Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: medium Component: perl-SVK AssignedTo: ianburrell(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: rpjday(a)crashcourse.ca QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ianburrell(a)gmail.com, fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora $ rpm -q perl-SVK perl-SVK-2.0.2-3.fc9.noarch $ rpm -q swig swig-1.3.33-2.fc9.i386 $ Every invocation of "svk" generates the warning: Name "swig_runtime_data::type_pointer3" used only once: possible typo at /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/DynaLoader.pm line 226. The command still runs but the warning gets a bit tiring after a while. P.S. Based on the error, it's possible this is a SWIG issue instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 15

[Bug 463124] New: Branch perl-Test-MinimumVersion for EPEL 5
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Dec '09

18 Dec '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Branch perl-Test-MinimumVersion for EPEL 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463124 Summary: Branch perl-Test-MinimumVersion for EPEL 5 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: perl-Test-MinimumVersion AssignedTo: ianburrell(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: ianburrell(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Test-MinimumVersion New Branches: EL-5 Updated EPEL Owners: iburrell -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 456019] New: Can we have libpTk.a built shared within perl-Tk ?
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Dec '09

18 Dec '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456019 Summary: Can we have libpTk.a built shared within perl-Tk ? Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Tk AssignedTo: andreas.bierfert(a)lowlatency.de ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Description of problem: libpTk.a is built statically within perl-Tk package. This file isn't provided, so any dependency that what to extend the widget for perl-Tk will need to build again this static library. I would be better to have a shared built instead (if doable) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): current perl-Tk How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. built a perl-Tk dependency that extend the widget capability (case study perl-Tk-TableMatrix, see #444745) 2. by default it will build the libpTk.a again 3. Each Shared Objet widget will pick from libpTk.a as needed, raising the size of the resulting .so (if not having duplicate code). Actual results: -llibpTk is using libpTk.a Expected results: -llibpTk should use libpTk.so Additional info: The related licenses files should probably be added to the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 5

[Bug 247476] New: Changed upstream...
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Dec '09

17 Dec '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247476 Summary: Changed upstream... Product: Fedora Version: f7 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Mail-SPF-Query AssignedTo: steve(a)silug.org ReportedBy: lmb(a)biosci.ki.se QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Shouldn't this package be updated/replaced with perl-Mail-SPF 2.005?? Note the missing query in the name. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.999.1-3.fc7 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 8

[Bug 237421] New: Bad cpuTime retrieved from Sys::Virt::Domain->get_info
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Dec '09

17 Dec '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237421 Summary: Bad cpuTime retrieved from Sys::Virt::Domain->get_info Product: Fedora Extras Version: fc6 Platform: i686 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: perl-Sys-Virt AssignedTo: steve(a)silug.org ReportedBy: g+fedora(a)pkg.fr QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: berrange@redhat.com,fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Description of problem: I tried the API on a AMD Athlon(tm) XP 3000+, I got bad values with some negative one for the cpuTime of a domain. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-Sys-Virt-0.1.1 How reproducible: every time Steps to Reproduce: 1. Run a server with some xen domains 2. Try the example included in the package: /usr/share/doc/perl-Sys-Virt-0.1.1/examples/dump-info.pl 3. Observe the "cpuTime" values Actual results: False Expected results: Good Additional info: I search the sources and I found this value is in fact unsigned long long value in libvirt library to represent nanoseconds (cf http://libvirt.org/html/libvirt-libvirt.html#virDomainInfo) I didn't try on a 64 bits arch but I think the it could work on it. I managed to obtain the expected results by patching the sources: I edit Virt.xs from the source and changed the line 359 from: hv_store (RETVAL, "cpuTime", 7, newSViv(info.cpuTime), 0); to hv_store (RETVAL, "cpuTime", 7, newSVnv(info.cpuTime), 0); So the unsigned long long is read as a float scalar and not an integer scalar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 13

[Bug 199736] New: perl C compiler Can't locate object method "IVX" via package "B::NV"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Dec '09

03 Dec '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199736 Summary: perl C compiler Can't locate object method "IVX" via package "B::NV" Product: Fedora Core Version: fc5 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: perl AssignedTo: jvdias(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: timliim(a)lucent.com QAContact: dkl(a)redhat.com CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Description of problem: When compile perl script into C code, modules complained Can't locate object method "IVX" via package "B::NV" Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): $ rpm -qf /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/B/C.pm perl-5.8.8-5 How reproducible: always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. create a file tw.pl with this content: #!/usr/bin/perl -w use strict; package mx; sub new {} #sub x { my $m = 5.1; } 1; 2. compile with this line time perl -MO=C tw.pl > t.c Actual results: Got error msg Can't locate object method "IVX" via package "B::NV" at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/B/C.pm line 650. CHECK failed--call queue aborted. Expected results: Compiling ok, produce a compilable .c file: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 6

[Bug 447006] New: BR Test::CPAN::Meta
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Nov '09

18 Nov '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447006 Summary: BR Test::CPAN::Meta Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Module-Install AssignedTo: steve(a)silug.org ReportedBy: steve(a)silug.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com t/97_meta........... skipped all skipped: Test::CPAN::Meta 0.07 not available for testing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 6

[Bug 229179] New: check_whitelist and check_spamd scripts missing.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229179 Summary: check_whitelist and check_spamd scripts missing. Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: normal Component: spamassassin AssignedTo: wtogami(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: m.d.t.evans(a)qmul.ac.uk CC: fedora-perl-devel- list@redhat.com,felicity@kluge.net,jm@jmason.org,parkerm @pobox.com,reg+redhat@sidney.com,wtogami@redhat.com Description of problem: The SA source contains 2 useful perl scripts, one to maintain the autowhitelist database file and a nagios monitoring script. It would be helpful if you could include them. I've attached a patch below (which you will may want to tweak a bit). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 3.1.8-1.fc6 ------- Additional Comments From m.d.t.evans(a)qmul.ac.uk 2007-02-19 07:00 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=148315) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=148315&action=view) Patch file for spamassassin that adds check_whitelist and check_spamd scripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 12

[Bug 438078] New: change smtpdaemon to server(smtp)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438078 Summary: change smtpdaemon to server(smtp) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: amavisd-new AssignedTo: steve(a)silug.org ReportedBy: pertusus(a)free.fr QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Now that all servers have the server(smtp) virtual provides, it should be possible to change the requires smtpdaemon to server(smtp). http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ServerProvides This is also a good opportunity to check that a local smtp server is really needed. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 4

[Bug 428136] New: package is deprecated
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428136 Summary: package is deprecated Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Perl6-Bible AssignedTo: steve(a)silug.org ReportedBy: rc040203(a)freenet.de QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Upstream has deprecated Perl6::Bible cf. http://search.cpan.org/~lichtkind/Perl6-Bible-0.37/ Unless there is another package using it in Fedora (I am not aware of any), I would think it would be appropriate to remove this package from rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 5

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
138
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

perl-devel February 2009