perl-devel June 2009

perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

27 participants
495 discussions

[Bug 477426] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Mar '10

17 Mar '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477426 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: monafont AssignedTo: mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp, fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]$.*$src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_… - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2… http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 9

[Bug 464964] New: FTBFS perl-RRD-Simple-1.43-3.fc9
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Mar '10

14 Mar '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS perl-RRD-Simple-1.43-3.fc9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464964 Summary: FTBFS perl-RRD-Simple-1.43-3.fc9 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/mo ck-results/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: high Component: perl-RRD-Simple AssignedTo: cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu ReportedBy: ftbfs(a)fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu, fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Blocks: 463452 Classification: Fedora perl-RRD-Simple-1.43-3.fc9.src.rpm Failed To Build From Source against the rawhide tree. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS for more information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 16

[Bug 484866] New: perl-Network-IPv4Addr : Conflicts with other packages
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Mar '10

08 Mar '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Network-IPv4Addr : Conflicts with other packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484866 Summary: perl-Network-IPv4Addr : Conflicts with other packages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Network-IPv4Addr AssignedTo: dennis(a)ausil.us ReportedBy: bugs.michael(a)gmx.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com, dennis(a)ausil.us Classification: Fedora perl-Network-IPv4Addr-0.05-13.fc11.noarch in rawhide-development-i386 File conflict with: perl-Net-IPv4Addr-0.10-3.fc9.noarch /usr/share/man/man1/ipv4calc.1.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 484865] New: perl-Net-IPv4Addr : Conflicts with other packages
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Mar '10

08 Mar '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Net-IPv4Addr : Conflicts with other packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484865 Summary: perl-Net-IPv4Addr : Conflicts with other packages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Net-IPv4Addr AssignedTo: sindrepb(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bugs.michael(a)gmx.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: sindrepb(a)fedoraproject.org, fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora perl-Net-IPv4Addr-0.10-3.fc9.noarch in rawhide-development-i386 File conflict with: perl-Network-IPv4Addr-0.05-13.fc11.noarch /usr/share/man/man1/ipv4calc.1.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 508194] New: RFE: split /usr/bin/padre into own subpackage
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Mar '10

01 Mar '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: RFE: split /usr/bin/padre into own subpackage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508194 Summary: RFE: split /usr/bin/padre into own subpackage Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Padre AssignedTo: mmaslano(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com, mmaslano(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=349494) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=349494) spec file patch It would be nice (and make more sense) if we could split /usr/bin/padre into a "padre" subpackage here, the same way we do for nopaste (perl-App-Nopaste), asciio (perl-App-Asciio) and git-cpan-patch (perl-Git-CPAN-Patch), to name a couple. I've attached a patch to do this :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Bug 504256] New: Please build latest perl-Math-BigInt-GMP for EPEL 4 and 5
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Feb '10

03 Feb '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please build latest perl-Math-BigInt-GMP for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504256 Summary: Please build latest perl-Math-BigInt-GMP for EPEL 4 and 5 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP AssignedTo: steve(a)silug.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: steve(a)silug.org, fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com, scheck(a)etes.de Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Please build latest perl-Math-BigInt-GMP for EPEL 4 and 5. As the %check section doesn't work on EPEL 4 and 5, I'm suggesting the following block to use instead: %if 0%{?fedora}%{?rhel} > 5 %check make test %endif And the %{fixperm} thing maybe doesn't exist on EPEL 4 as well, there could be chmod -R u+w $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* get necessary. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-Math-BigInt-GMP-1.24-1 Additional info: Please let me know, if you just don't want to be the maintainer for the perl-Math-BigInt-GMP EPEL packages... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Bug 508643] New: Can we point perl-Test-Spelling at hunspell instead of aspell ?
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jan '10

29 Jan '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Can we point perl-Test-Spelling at hunspell instead of aspell ? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508643 Summary: Can we point perl-Test-Spelling at hunspell instead of aspell ? Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Test-Spelling AssignedTo: tcallawa(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: caolanm(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tcallawa(a)redhat.com, fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=349767) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=349767) like so Description of problem: Following our dictionary policy of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureDictionary can we move perl-Test-Spelling to hunspell instead of aspell Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-Test-Spelling-0.11-4 i.e. how about the following trivial-ish patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 486752] New: Fedora::Bugzilla needs to depend on MooseX::MultiInitArg
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Dec '09

18 Dec '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Fedora::Bugzilla needs to depend on MooseX::MultiInitArg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486752 Summary: Fedora::Bugzilla needs to depend on MooseX::MultiInitArg Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Fedora-Bugzilla AssignedTo: cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu ReportedBy: cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu, fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora perl-Fedora-Bugzilla silently misses a dep on MooseX::MultiInitArg. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 479101] New: SElinux and Kwiki: not done yet
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Dec '09

18 Dec '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: SElinux and Kwiki: not done yet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479101 Summary: SElinux and Kwiki: not done yet Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Kwiki AssignedTo: steve(a)silug.org ReportedBy: kernel(a)pkts.ca QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: steve(a)silug.org, fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: I've installed perl-Kwiki-0.39-3.fc9.noarch and found that it only works when I type 'setenforce 0'. This indicates that the package has not been selinux-ified yet. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-Kwiki-0.39-3.fc9.noarch How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install perl-Kwiki and all related perl-Kwiki-* modules. 2. cd /var/www/html 3. kwiki -new kwiki 4. access it Actual results: Permission denied. type=AVC msg=audit(1231312115.429:446): avc: denied { create } for pid=14831 comm="index.cgi" name="pGk5VmnoH1" scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:httpd_sys_content_t:s0 tclass=file type=AVC msg=audit(1231312115.429:446): avc: denied { write } for pid=14831 comm="index.cgi" name="pGk5VmnoH1" dev=dm-0 ino=3883227 scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:httpd_sys_content_t:s0 tclass=file type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1231312115.429:446): arch=40000003 syscall=5 success=yes exit=28 a0=9a8b03c a1=280c2 a2=180 a3=280c2 items=0 ppid=14470 pid=14831 auid=0 uid=48 gid=48 euid=48 suid=48 fsuid=48 egid=48 sgid=48 fsgid=48 tty=(none) ses=2 comm="index.cgi" exe="/usr/bin/perl" subj=unconfined_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0 key=(null) type=AVC msg=audit(1231312115.430:447): avc: denied { setattr } for pid=14831 comm="index.cgi" name="pGk5VmnoH1" dev=dm-0 ino=3883227 scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:httpd_sys_content_t:s0 tclass=file type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1231312115.430:447): arch=40000003 syscall=15 success=yes exit=0 a0=9a8ac1c a1=180 a2=d5f5ec a3=9a8ac1c items=0 ppid=14470 pid=14831 auid=0 uid=48 gid=48 euid=48 suid=48 fsuid=48 egid=48 sgid=48 fsgid=48 tty=(none) ses=2 comm="index.cgi" exe="/usr/bin/perl" subj=unconfined_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0 key=(null) type=AVC msg=audit(1231312115.431:448): avc: denied { rename } for pid=14831 comm="index.cgi" name="pGk5VmnoH1" dev=dm-0 ino=3883227 scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:httpd_sys_content_t:s0 tclass=file type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1231312115.431:448): arch=40000003 syscall=38 success=yes exit=0 a0=9a8b114 a1=99d6b7c a2=d5f5ec a3=926c008 items=0 ppid=14470 pid=14831 auid=0 uid=48 gid=48 euid=48 suid=48 fsuid=48 egid=48 sgid=48 fsgid=48 tty=(none) ses=2 comm="index.cgi" exe="/usr/bin/perl" subj=unconfined_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0 key=(null) Expected results: Not permission denied. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 473407] New: Every invocation of "svk" generates the same warning.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Dec '09

18 Dec '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Every invocation of "svk" generates the same warning. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473407 Summary: Every invocation of "svk" generates the same warning. Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: medium Component: perl-SVK AssignedTo: ianburrell(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: rpjday(a)crashcourse.ca QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ianburrell(a)gmail.com, fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora $ rpm -q perl-SVK perl-SVK-2.0.2-3.fc9.noarch $ rpm -q swig swig-1.3.33-2.fc9.i386 $ Every invocation of "svk" generates the warning: Name "swig_runtime_data::type_pointer3" used only once: possible typo at /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/DynaLoader.pm line 226. The command still runs but the warning gets a bit tiring after a while. P.S. Based on the error, it's possible this is a SWIG issue instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 15

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
50
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

perl-devel June 2009