Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: flags argument of $pool->refresh() undocumented
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519710
Summary: flags argument of $pool->refresh() undocumented
Product: Fedora
Version: 11
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: perl-Sys-Virt
AssignedTo: steve(a)silug.org
ReportedBy: mbooth(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: steve(a)silug.org, berrange(a)redhat.com,
fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
man Sys::Virt::StoragePool says:
$pool->refresh();
Refresh the storage pool state. Typically this will rescan the list
of storage volumes.
However this code:
$pool->refresh();
dies with:
Usage: Sys::Virt::StoragePool::refresh(pool, flags) at
/home/mbooth/src/virt-v2v/snapshot/virt-snapshot.pl line 328.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-Sys-Virt-0.2.0-2.fc11.x86_64
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: virStorageVolLookupBy* not implemented
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519648
Summary: virStorageVolLookupBy* not implemented
Product: Fedora
Version: 11
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: perl-Sys-Virt
AssignedTo: steve(a)silug.org
ReportedBy: mbooth(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: steve(a)silug.org, berrange(a)redhat.com,
fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Depends on: 519647
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Clone Of: 519647
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #519647 +++
Description of problem:
The following calls available in the C api have no perl bindings:
virStorageVolLookupByKey
virStorageVolLookupByName
virStorageVolLookupByPath
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-Sys-Virt-0.2.0-2.fc11.x86_64
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: man Sys::Virt: get_node_info onwards is confusing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513987
Summary: man Sys::Virt: get_node_info onwards is confusing
Product: Fedora
Version: 11
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: perl-Sys-Virt
AssignedTo: steve(a)silug.org
ReportedBy: mbooth(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: steve(a)silug.org, berrange(a)redhat.com,
fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
man Sys::Virt says:
my $info = $con->get_node_info()
Returns a hash reference summarising the capabilities of the host
node. The elements of the hash are as follows:
However, what follows does not appear to be a description of the hash. At that
same point, the convention for describing a method changes. $vmm is variously
referred to as $con or $conn. Unless, of course, these methods are genuinely
different in some way that isn't clear.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-Sys-Virt-0.2.0-2.fc11.i586
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Net::DBus::Object does not correctly validate requested method name to invoke
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499243
Summary: Net::DBus::Object does not correctly validate
requested method name to invoke
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: Security
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: perl-Net-DBus
AssignedTo: cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu
ReportedBy: berrange(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: berrange(a)redhat.com, cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu,
fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
There is a security issue in the implementation of Net::DBus::Object.
In the place where it dispatches RPC calls, it simply does
$self->can($method_name)
so, it allows the dbus client to invoke any method that the service side object
implements. Many service implementors would like ability to restrict this to
just allow methods they explicitly export in the introspection XML data.
Furthermore, the current check also allows direct invocation of several
internal impl methods of Net::DBus::Object itself.
This allows a remote client to do a denial of service by calling 'disconnect'
which unregisters the object from the bus. It also allows the remote client to
emit signals on the object which others clients may then act on.
For the dbus 'system' bus, the service can be running as root, and client as an
unprivileged user, so this flaw may allow a client to run things they
shouldn't. While impact of being able to emit signals / invoke improper methods
*may* be limited by the need to have ACLs registered with dbus system bus
instance, the degree of protection depends on how well the app author wrote
their ACLs. So one can't rely on this.
For the dbus 'session' bus, everything is running as unprivileged user, so
impact is reasonably low, denial of service.
This issue is already public via upstream bug report
https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=45034
And I have a patch available which should resolve it
http://hg.berrange.com/libraries/net-dbus--devel?cs=be26112c5fdd
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run the 'examples/example-service.pl' file from source tar.gz
2. In another terminal run
$ dbus-send --session --print-reply --dest=org.designfu.SampleService
/SomeObject org.designfu.SampleInterface.HelloWorld "string:hello"
$ dbus-send --session --print-reply --dest=org.designfu.SampleService
/SomeObject org.designfu.SampleInterface.disconnect
$ dbus-send --session --print-reply --dest=org.designfu.SampleService
/SomeObject org.designfu.SampleInterface.HelloWorld "string:hello"
Actual results:
The 'disconnect' method was allowed
$ dbus-send --session --print-reply --dest=org.designfu.SampleService
/SomeObject org.designfu.SampleInterface.HelloWorld "string:hello"
method return sender=:1.61 -> dest=:1.62 reply_serial=2
array [
string "Hello"
string " from example-service.pl"
]
$ dbus-send --session --print-reply --dest=org.designfu.SampleService
/SomeObject org.designfu.SampleInterface.disconnect
method return sender=:1.61 -> dest=:1.63 reply_serial=2
$ dbus-send --session --print-reply --dest=org.designfu.SampleService
/SomeObject org.designfu.SampleInterface.HelloWorld "string:hello"
Error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.UnknownMethod: Method "HelloWorld" with
signature "s" on interface "org.designfu.SampleInterface" doesn't exist
Expected results:
The 'disconnect' method should be denied
$ dbus-send --session --print-reply --dest=org.designfu.SampleService
/SomeObject org.designfu.SampleInterface.HelloWorld "string:hello"
method return sender=:1.65 -> dest=:1.66 reply_serial=2
array [
string "Hello"
string " from example-service.pl"
]
$ dbus-send --session --print-reply --dest=org.designfu.SampleService
/SomeObject org.designfu.SampleInterface.disconnect
Error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.Failed: No such method SomeObject->disconnect
$ dbus-send --session --print-reply --dest=org.designfu.SampleService
/SomeObject org.designfu.SampleInterface.HelloWorld "string:hello"
method return sender=:1.65 -> dest=:1.68 reply_serial=2
array [
string "Hello"
string " from example-service.pl"
]
Additional info:
Bug affects all Fedora releases.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: make check fails
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496369
Summary: make check fails
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: s390x
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: perl-IPC-Shareable
AssignedTo: tcallawa(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: karsten(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: tcallawa(a)redhat.com, fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
As I'm no perl expert I need your help with a build failure on s390x.
Full logs are available at
http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=49521
Could you take a look at it, please ? It is blocking the builds of several
other
perl packages atm.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-IPC-Shareable-0.60-9.fc11
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: rpmbuild generates perl provides/depends differently in F-10 than any prior level
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473874
Summary: rpmbuild generates perl provides/depends differently
in F-10 than any prior level
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: urgent
Priority: medium
Component: rpm
AssignedTo: pmatilai(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: pmatilai(a)redhat.com, jnovy(a)redhat.com,
fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com, ffesti(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
rpm in F10+ processes Perl depends/requires differently than in any prior level
of Fedora.
e.g., see koji scratch builds of perl-Data-TreeDumper:
dist-f9: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=965620
dist-f10: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=965622
dist-f11: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=965644
Note dist-f9's list of provides/requires from the build.log:
Provides:
perl(Data::TreeDumper) = 0.35
Requires:
perl >= 0:5.006
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
perl(Carp)
perl(Check::ISA)
perl(Class::ISA)
perl(Exporter)
perl(Sort::Naturally)
perl(Text::Wrap)
perl(strict)
perl(warnings)
...and dist-f10, f11:
Provides:
perl(Data::TreeDumper) = 0.35
perl(Potatoe)
perl(SuperObject)
perl(SuperObjectWithAutoload)
perl(TiedArray)
perl(TiedHandle)
perl(TiedHash)
perl(TiedScalar)
perl(Vegetable)
Requires:
perl >= 0:5.006
perl(AutoLoader)
perl(Carp)
perl(Check::ISA)
perl(Class::ISA)
perl(Data::TreeDumper)
perl(Devel::Peek)
perl(Exporter)
perl(Sort::Naturally)
perl(Text::Wrap)
perl(Tie::Array)
perl(Tie::Handle)
perl(Tie::Hash)
perl(Tie::Scalar)
perl(strict)
perl(warnings)
Note the additional "provides" found under f10+ (e.g. perl(Potatoe)) are from
scripts stored in %_docdir, without their executable bit set; also note the
additional requires (e.g. perl(Tie::Array)) not present in the package built
under dist-f9. This is a major change of behaviour from all versions prior to
F-10, and may result in many of the nearly 1000 Perl packages in Fedora to
start generating unexpected requires/provides when they're rebuilt.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rpm-4.6.0-0.rc1.7
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456144
Summary: Package build failed
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: amavisd-new
AssignedTo: steve(a)silug.org
ReportedBy: miguel.filho(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
I've tried to build the 2.6.1 using the devel branch on CentOS 5, but two
patches fail to apply.
amavisd-conf.patch
amavisd-db.patch
I'm submitting updated patches that work.
------- Additional Comments From miguel.filho(a)gmail.com 2008-07-21 14:10 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=312286)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=312286&action=view)
Updated fix for amavisd-nanny
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.021 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520401
Summary: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.021 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: ASSIGNED
Keywords: FutureFeature
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2
AssignedTo: skasal(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: skasal(a)redhat.com, fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com,
mmaslano(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Latest upstream release: 2.021
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 2.020
URL: http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Compress/
Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Params-Validate is not available in EPEL4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503767
Summary: perl-Params-Validate is not available in EPEL4
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: el4
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: perl-Params-Validate
AssignedTo: rob.myers(a)gtri.gatech.edu
ReportedBy: xavier(a)bachelot.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: rob.myers(a)gtri.gatech.edu,
fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com, lxtnow(a)gmail.com
Depends on: 503766
Classification: Fedora
perl-Params-Validate is branched but not available in EPEL4. The version from
EPEL5 rebuilds fine on EL4.
Could you please built it ?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: flags argument of $pool->refresh() undocumented
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519712
Summary: flags argument of $pool->refresh() undocumented
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Version: 5.4
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: perl-Sys-Virt
AssignedTo: berrange(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: mbooth(a)redhat.com
CC: steve(a)silug.org, berrange(a)redhat.com,
fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Red Hat
Target Release: ---
Clone Of: 519710
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #519710 +++
Description of problem:
man Sys::Virt::StoragePool says:
$pool->refresh();
Refresh the storage pool state. Typically this will rescan the list
of storage volumes.
However this code:
$pool->refresh();
dies with:
Usage: Sys::Virt::StoragePool::refresh(pool, flags) at
/home/mbooth/src/virt-v2v/snapshot/virt-snapshot.pl line 328.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-Sys-Virt-0.2.0-3.el5
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.