perl-devel December 2013

perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

21 participants
778 discussions

[Bug 783468] New: missing dependancy on perl-Email-Simple-Creator
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Apr '17

06 Apr '17

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: missing dependancy on perl-Email-Simple-Creator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783468 Summary: missing dependancy on perl-Email-Simple-Creator Product: Fedora EPEL Version: el5 Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: perl-Email-MIME-Creator AssignedTo: tcallawa(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: carl.johnstone(a)onthebeach.co.uk QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tcallawa(a)redhat.com, fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Description of problem: The perl-Email-MIME-Creator package has a missing dependency on Email::Simple::Creator / perl-Email-Simple-Creator Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-Email-MIME-Creator.noarch 0:1.453-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 706721] New: Missing Requires: perl(Clone)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Apr '17

06 Apr '17

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Missing Requires: perl(Clone) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706721 Summary: Missing Requires: perl(Clone) Product: Fedora EPEL Version: el5 Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: perl-Hash-Merge AssignedTo: tcallawa(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla(a)camperquake.de QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tcallawa(a)redhat.com, iarnell(a)gmail.com, fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Description of problem: perl-Hash-Merge requires perl(Clone), but the spec does not reflect this. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-Hash-Merge-0.11-2.el5 How reproducible: Look at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Hash/Merge.pm, line 231 Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 703101] New: [PATCH] DateTime should be rebuilt on tzdata updates
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Apr '17

06 Apr '17

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [PATCH] DateTime should be rebuilt on tzdata updates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703101 Summary: [PATCH] DateTime should be rebuilt on tzdata updates Product: Fedora EPEL Version: el5 Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: perl-DateTime AssignedTo: tremble(a)tremble.org.uk ReportedBy: lkundrak(a)v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com, tremble(a)tremble.org.uk Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Description of problem: tzdata package updates and new time zones are added from time to time (such as Asia/Kolkata). As DateTime contains files generated from it, it should be rebuilt on each such update. The patch attached adds an explicit dependency on specific version of tzdata, so that it would disallow updates in case of tzdata rebuild w/o DateTime rebuilt, so that it would no go unnoticed. Additional info: At the very least, even if the patch is rejected, please trigger a DateTime rebuild. Maybe coordinate with tzdata maintainer on future updates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 4

[Bug 757089] New: cpanspec error: Dest dir longer than base dir is not supported
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Apr '17

04 Apr '17

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: cpanspec error: Dest dir longer than base dir is not supported https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757089 Summary: cpanspec error: Dest dir longer than base dir is not supported Product: Fedora Version: 16 Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: cpanspec AssignedTo: steve(a)silug.org ReportedBy: kas(a)fi.muni.cz QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: steve(a)silug.org, fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Description of problem: I am trying to build some CPAN modules as RPMs (namely Env::C and IO::Socket::Multicast), but the build fails with the following error: [...] extracting debug info from /root/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-Env-C-0.08-1.fc16.x86_64/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/Env/C/C.so Dest dir longer than base dir is not supported error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.LI9AHv (%install) I am not sure why the length of both paths should matter at all, but the cause of the problem is that cpanspec sets up too long buildroot. Taking the generated spec file, shortening the buildroot path, and rebuilding the package using the modified spec file works for me Before: BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) After: BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name} Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): cpanspec-1.78-9.fc16.noarch How reproducible: 100 % Steps to Reproduce: 1. cpanspec --build Env::C Actual results: build fails with the above error message Expected results: perl-Env-C binary and source RPMs should be built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 10

[Bug 347901] New: Port perl-IO-Socket-SSL to use NSS library for cryptography
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Jan '17

05 Jan '17

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=347901 Summary: Port perl-IO-Socket-SSL to use NSS library for cryptography Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: perl-IO-Socket-SSL AssignedTo: wtogami(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: pvrabec(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel- list@redhat.com,jpo@di.uminho.pt,tmraz@redhat.com perl-IO-Socket-SSL should be ported to use NSS library for cryptography. See the tracking bug for details and links on how it could be done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 2

[Bug 874942] New: Net-DNS: system configuration is used instead of user's
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Dec '16

20 Dec '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874942 Bug ID: 874942 QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Severity: high External Bug URL: http://rt.cpan.org/Public/ Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: mmaslano(a)redhat.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psabata(a)redhat.com Assignee: mmaslano(a)redhat.com Summary: Net-DNS: system configuration is used instead of user's Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: mmaslano(a)redhat.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: perl-Net-DNS Product: Fedora External Bug ID: CPAN 67602 If I define my own configuration file, system files are used, which could be security issue. Example: My configuration file is defined as: my $res = Net::DNS::Resolver->new(config_file => '/my/dns.conf'); These files are read even if I defined my own file: /etc/resolv.conf $HOME/.resolv.conf ./.resolv.conf Last 2 files shouldn't be read by default since it's possible security issue - user can drop .resolv.conf pointing to malicious dns server. This issue was found during testing spamassassin with selinux. For details see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh ow_bug.cgi?id=628866#c2 I'm reporting this error back into our bugzilla because of last comment in rt: I think the level of this PR should be elevated to 'security'. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Bug 831716] New: Moving legacy code out of perl-JSON-RPC breaks Bugzilla
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Dec '16

13 Dec '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831716 Bug ID: 831716 QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Severity: high Version: 17 Priority: unspecified CC: emmanuel.seyman(a)club-internet.fr, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: emmanuel.seyman(a)club-internet.fr Summary: Moving legacy code out of perl-JSON-RPC breaks Bugzilla Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: lpsolit(a)netscape.net Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: perl-JSON-RPC Product: Fedora Bugzilla still uses legacy code from JSON::RPC and despite the perl-JSON-RPC package is installed, which makes checksetup.pl happy, the JSON-RPC feature of Bugzilla fails because it cannot find the legacy code. This also prevents Apache from starting when mod_perl is enabled: httpd[1938]: Can't locate JSON/RPC/Legacy/Server/CGI.pm in @INC So the legacy code is still required by Bugzilla, and checksetup.pl and Bugzilla re confused by this package split. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 26

[Bug 994894] New: perl-Soot does not support ARM
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Nov '16

24 Nov '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994894 Bug ID: 994894 Summary: perl-Soot does not support ARM Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-SOOT Assignee: ppisar(a)redhat.com Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com Depends On: 991031 Blocks: 485251 (F-ExcludeArch-ARM) perl-Soot requires root which does not support ARM (bug #991031). perl-Soot will be disabled on ARM. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CKPzevCLAa&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 9

[Bug 808197] New: FTBFS: big endian bug in self checks
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Nov '16

09 Nov '16

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS: big endian bug in self checks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808197 Summary: FTBFS: big endian bug in self checks Product: Fedora Version: 17 Platform: powerpc OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: medium Component: perl-Socket-Netlink AssignedTo: bochecha(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: karsten(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com, bochecha(a)fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Description of problem: perl-Socket-Netlink fails to build on PPC as two of the self checks fail, one of them looks like a big endian bug as the result has a swapped bit: t/12netlink-message-header.t ..... ok # Failed test '$message->attrs after unpack' # at t/13netlink-message-attrs.t line 98. # Structures begin differing at: # $got->{str} = '' # $expected->{str} = 'FGH' # Looks like you failed 1 test of 14. t/13netlink-message-attrs.t ...... Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) Failed 1/14 subtests t/14netlink-message-error.t ...... ok # Failed test '$message->pack' # at t/20io-socket-netlink-generic.t line 55. # at bytes 0-0xf (0-15) # got: | 00 00 00 14 00 1e 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................| # exp: | 00 00 00 14 00 00 00 1e 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................| # Looks like you failed 1 test of 13. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-Socket-Netlink-0.03-4.fc17 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. ppc-koji build --scratch f17 perl-Socket-Netlink-0.03-4.fc17.src.rpm 2. 3. Actual results: http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=469988 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 671445] New: [PATCH] specfile accords to new packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Nov '16

03 Nov '16

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [PATCH] specfile accords to new packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671445 Summary: [PATCH] specfile accords to new packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: cpanspec AssignedTo: steve(a)silug.org ReportedBy: mmaslano(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: steve(a)silug.org, fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Created attachment 474630 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=474630 add epel option This patch should remove things, which are not needed according to new packaging guidelines and latest rpm eg. defining buildroot. The old behaviour is available under --epel option. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

perl-devel December 2013