perl-devel March 2013

perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

26 participants
877 discussions

[Bug 669320] New: perl-DateTime Newer in EPEL 6 than in RHEL 6
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Aug '14

18 Aug '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-DateTime Newer in EPEL 6 than in RHEL 6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669320 Summary: perl-DateTime Newer in EPEL 6 than in RHEL 6 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: el6 Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-DateTime AssignedTo: tremble(a)tremble.org.uk ReportedBy: myllynen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com, tremble(a)tremble.org.uk Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: EPEL 6 has perl-DateTime-0.5300-4.el6 but RHEL 6 Optional only has perl-DateTime-0.5300-1.el6 - this is against https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL6-FAQ#What_can_be_in_EPEL.3F Could this be corrected so that the EPEL package won't update the RHEL package? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 828517] New: CVE-2011-5092 rt3: remote arbitrary code execution and privilege elevation flaw [epel-6]
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Aug '14

08 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828517 Bug ID: 828517 Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Blocks: 828512 QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Severity: high Version: el6 Priority: high CC: mmahut(a)redhat.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, tremble(a)tremble.org.uk, xavier(a)bachelot.org Assignee: xavier(a)bachelot.org Summary: CVE-2011-5092 rt3: remote arbitrary code execution and privilege elevation flaw [epel-6] Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: vdanen(a)redhat.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: rt3 Product: Fedora EPEL This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected Fedora versions. For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field. For more information see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs When creating a Bodhi update request, please include this bug ID and the bug IDs of this bug's parent bugs filed against the "Security Response" product (the top-level CVE bugs). Please mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog when available. Bodhi update submission link: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/?type_=security&bugs=828512 epel-6 tracking bug for rt3: see blocks bug list for full details of the security issue(s). [bug automatically created by: add-tracking-bugs] -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 647783] New: perl-Mail-Box shouldn't force spamassassin to be installed
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Aug '14

01 Aug '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Mail-Box shouldn't force spamassassin to be installed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647783 Summary: perl-Mail-Box shouldn't force spamassassin to be installed Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Mail-Box AssignedTo: tcallawa(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: jik(a)kamens.brookline.ma.us QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tcallawa(a)redhat.com, fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora People who aren't planning on using spamassassin shouldn't be forced to install it just to be able to use the modules in perl-Mail-Box, most of which are totally independent of spamassassin. One fix would be to remove the dependency on Mail::SpamAssassin completely from the perl-Mail-Box RPM, in which case, people who try to use spamassassin functionality in perl-Mail-Box will simply get an error because of the missing module and know they need to install spamassassin. Another fix would be to split the perl modules in spamassassin into a separate RPM, e.g., spamassassin-perl, so they can be installed without the rest of spamassassin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 30

[Bug 839744] New: Review Request: perl-Rose-DateTime - DateTime helper functions and objects
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Aug '14

01 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839744 Bug ID: 839744 QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Clone Of: 839742 Version: rawhide Depends On: 839742 Priority: unspecified CC: notting(a)redhat.com, package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: perl-Rose-DateTime - DateTime helper functions and objects Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: wfp5p(a)virginia.edu Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://wfp.fedorapeople.org/perl-Rose-DateTime.spec SRPM URL: http://wfp.fedorapeople.org/perl-Rose-DateTime-0.537-2.fc17.src.rpm Description: The Rose::DateTime::* modules provide a few convenience functions and objects for use with DateTime dates. This requires Rose::Object Fedora Account System Username: wfp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 18

[Bug 914301] New: perl-Net-Amazon-S3: FTBFS in rawhide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jul '14

28 Jul '14

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914301 Bug ID: 914301 Summary: perl-Net-Amazon-S3: FTBFS in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Net-Amazon-S3 Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: dennis(a)ausil.us Blocks: 913825 Your package perl-Net-Amazon-S3 failed to build from source in current rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4973101 Build logs: root.log: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/3101/4973101/root.log build.log: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/3101/4973101/build.log state.log: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/3101/4973101/state.log NOTE: build logs are cleaned up after 1 week For details on mass rebuild see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Mass_Rebuild -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Ckt0Qp4yv4&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 8

[Bug 890721] New: perl-Net-Amazon-S3 in Fedora 17 is dated and needs to be updated to stop warnings
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jul '14

28 Jul '14

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890721 Bug ID: 890721 Summary: perl-Net-Amazon-S3 in Fedora 17 is dated and needs to be updated to stop warnings Product: Fedora Version: 17 Component: perl-Net-Amazon-S3 Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Reporter: paulej(a)arid.us Description of problem: perl-Net-Amazon-S3 in Fedora 17 is at 0.53. A change in Perl syntax has made syntax used in Net/Amazon/S3/Request/ListBucket.pm to be considered deprecated and Perl produces a warning when trying to use the package. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.53-3.fc17.noarch How reproducible: Easily reproduced with the 1-line Perl program as shown below. Steps to Reproduce: 1. perl -e "use Net::Amazon::S3" Actual results: Use of qw(...) as parentheses is deprecated at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Net/Amazon/S3/Request/ListBucket.pm line 22. Expected results: No warnings. Additional info: CPAN is currently at 0.58. I noted the syntax related to this function was changed in that version. It's a trivial syntax change and if it's not possible to use newer source code from CPAN, I would suggest at least incorporating that small syntax change into 0.53-xx used in Fedora. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pq3py00oEX&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 12

[Bug 923723] New: perl-Test-Inter-1.04 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jul '14

02 Jul '14

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923723 Bug ID: 923723 Summary: perl-Test-Inter-1.04 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Test-Inter Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: ppisar(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: mmaslano(a)redhat.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com Latest upstream release: 1.04 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.03 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Inter/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pkjY5tuqbH&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 5

[Bug 924210] New: perl-Test-Inter-1.05 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jul '14

02 Jul '14

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924210 Bug ID: 924210 Summary: perl-Test-Inter-1.05 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Test-Inter Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: ppisar(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: mmaslano(a)redhat.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com Latest upstream release: 1.05 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.03 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Inter/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=VEBPRGqPp2&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 5

[Bug 906461] New: wrong default pidfile in /etc/clamd.d/amavisd.conf
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jun '14

27 Jun '14

Product: Fedora EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906461 Bug ID: 906461 Summary: wrong default pidfile in /etc/clamd.d/amavisd.conf Product: Fedora EPEL Version: el6 Component: amavisd-new Severity: low Priority: unspecified Reporter: rgm(a)htt-consult.com Description of problem: The default pidfile for clamd in /etc/clamd.d/amavisd.conf does not default pidfile in /etc/clamd.conf Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): amavisd-new-2.6.4-2.el6.noarch.rpm as compared to clamd-0.97.6-1.el6.i686.rpm How reproducible: very Steps to Reproduce: 1. install amavisd-new and clamd 2. inspect .conf files 3. Actual results: /etc/clamd.d/amavisd.conf has the pidfile of /var/run/amavisd/clamd.pid whereas /etc/clamd.conf has the pidfile of /var/run/clamav/clamd.pid Expected results: Defaults should match Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=cbx9wRUoKT&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 6

[Bug 456357] New: rpm: perl.prov fails to detect $VERSION correctly on multiple assignments
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Jun '14

25 Jun '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456357 Summary: rpm: perl.prov fails to detect $VERSION correctly on multiple assignments Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: rpm AssignedTo: pmatilai(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel- list@redhat.com,jnovy@redhat.com,pauln@truemesh.com Description of problem: When $VERSION is set twice inside the same package, the latest definition prevails. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): rpm-4.4.2.3-2.fc9.x86_64 How reproducible: Package DateTime-Format-DBI :) (see bug 455788) Lines 10 and 11 of lib/DateTime/Format/DBI.pm are: $VERSION = '0.031'; $VERSION = $VERSION + 0.0; Note that perl.prov finds the version as "0.0". Actual results: ====> provides for perl-DateTime-Format-DBI-0.031-1.fc9.noarch.rpm perl(DateTime::Format::DBI) = 0.0 perl-DateTime-Format-DBI = 0.031-1.fc9 Expected results: ====> provides for perl-DateTime-Format-DBI-0.031-1.fc9.noarch.rpm perl(DateTime::Format::DBI) = 0.031 perl-DateTime-Format-DBI = 0.031-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 10

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
88
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

perl-devel March 2013