[Bug 906461] New: wrong default pidfile in /etc/clamd.d/amavisd.conf
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906461
Bug ID: 906461
Summary: wrong default pidfile in /etc/clamd.d/amavisd.conf
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: el6
Component: amavisd-new
Severity: low
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: rgm(a)htt-consult.com
Description of problem:
The default pidfile for clamd in /etc/clamd.d/amavisd.conf does not default
pidfile in /etc/clamd.conf
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
amavisd-new-2.6.4-2.el6.noarch.rpm
as compared to
clamd-0.97.6-1.el6.i686.rpm
How reproducible:
very
Steps to Reproduce:
1. install amavisd-new and clamd
2. inspect .conf files
3.
Actual results:
/etc/clamd.d/amavisd.conf has the pidfile of
/var/run/amavisd/clamd.pid
whereas /etc/clamd.conf has the pidfile of
/var/run/clamav/clamd.pid
Expected results:
Defaults should match
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=cbx9wRUoKT&a=cc_unsubscribe
8 years, 9 months
[Bug 456357] New: rpm: perl.prov fails to detect $VERSION correctly on multiple assignments
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456357
Summary: rpm: perl.prov fails to detect $VERSION correctly on
multiple assignments
Product: Fedora
Version: 9
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: rpm
AssignedTo: pmatilai(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-
list@redhat.com,jnovy@redhat.com,pauln(a)truemesh.com
Description of problem:
When $VERSION is set twice inside the same package, the latest definition prevails.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rpm-4.4.2.3-2.fc9.x86_64
How reproducible:
Package DateTime-Format-DBI :) (see bug 455788)
Lines 10 and 11 of lib/DateTime/Format/DBI.pm are:
$VERSION = '0.031';
$VERSION = $VERSION + 0.0;
Note that perl.prov finds the version as "0.0".
Actual results:
====> provides for perl-DateTime-Format-DBI-0.031-1.fc9.noarch.rpm
perl(DateTime::Format::DBI) = 0.0
perl-DateTime-Format-DBI = 0.031-1.fc9
Expected results:
====> provides for perl-DateTime-Format-DBI-0.031-1.fc9.noarch.rpm
perl(DateTime::Format::DBI) = 0.031
perl-DateTime-Format-DBI = 0.031-1.fc9
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
8 years, 9 months
[Bug 803340] New: RFE: update to at least 1.40
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: RFE: update to at least 1.40
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803340
Summary: RFE: update to at least 1.40
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: el5
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: perl-YAML-Tiny
AssignedTo: steve(a)silug.org
ReportedBy: paul(a)city-fan.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: steve(a)silug.org, fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
I need YAML::Tiny ≥ 1.40 for Test::MinimumVersion.
The changes between the current EPEL-5 version (1.04) and 1.40 (the version in
EL-6 by the way) appear to be bugfixes and enhancements, with no compatibility
issues.
I (pghmcfc) would be happy to co-maintain this package and do the update myself
if you're too busy.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8 years, 11 months