Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: cpanspec error: Dest dir longer than base dir is not supported
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757089
Summary: cpanspec error: Dest dir longer than base dir is not
supported
Product: Fedora
Version: 16
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: cpanspec
AssignedTo: steve(a)silug.org
ReportedBy: kas(a)fi.muni.cz
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: steve(a)silug.org, fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Description of problem:
I am trying to build some CPAN modules as RPMs (namely Env::C and
IO::Socket::Multicast), but the build fails with the following error:
[...]
extracting debug info from
/root/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-Env-C-0.08-1.fc16.x86_64/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/Env/C/C.so
Dest dir longer than base dir is not supported
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.LI9AHv (%install)
I am not sure why the length of both paths should matter at all, but the cause
of the problem is that cpanspec sets up too long buildroot.
Taking the generated spec file, shortening the buildroot path, and rebuilding
the package using the modified spec file works for me
Before:
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
After:
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
cpanspec-1.78-9.fc16.noarch
How reproducible:
100 %
Steps to Reproduce:
1. cpanspec --build Env::C
Actual results:
build fails with the above error message
Expected results:
perl-Env-C binary and source RPMs should be built
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=347901
Summary: Port perl-IO-Socket-SSL to use NSS library for
cryptography
Product: Fedora
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: perl-IO-Socket-SSL
AssignedTo: wtogami(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: pvrabec(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-
list@redhat.com,jpo@di.uminho.pt,tmraz@redhat.com
perl-IO-Socket-SSL should be ported to use NSS library for cryptography.
See the tracking bug for details and links on how it could be done.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874942
Bug ID: 874942
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: high
External Bug URL: http://rt.cpan.org/Public/
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: mmaslano(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psabata(a)redhat.com
Assignee: mmaslano(a)redhat.com
Summary: Net-DNS: system configuration is used instead of
user's
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: mmaslano(a)redhat.com
Type: Bug
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Net-DNS
Product: Fedora
External Bug ID: CPAN 67602
If I define my own configuration file, system files are used, which could be
security issue. Example: My configuration file is defined as: my $res =
Net::DNS::Resolver->new(config_file => '/my/dns.conf'); These files are read
even if I defined my own file: /etc/resolv.conf $HOME/.resolv.conf
./.resolv.conf Last 2 files shouldn't be read by default since it's possible
security issue - user can drop .resolv.conf pointing to malicious dns server.
This issue was found during testing spamassassin with selinux. For details see:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh ow_bug.cgi?id=628866#c2
I'm reporting this error back into our bugzilla because of last comment in rt:
I think the level of this PR should be elevated to 'security'.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831716
Bug ID: 831716
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: high
Version: 17
Priority: unspecified
CC: emmanuel.seyman(a)club-internet.fr,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Assignee: emmanuel.seyman(a)club-internet.fr
Summary: Moving legacy code out of perl-JSON-RPC breaks
Bugzilla
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Linux
Reporter: lpsolit(a)netscape.net
Type: Bug
Documentation: ---
Hardware: All
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: perl-JSON-RPC
Product: Fedora
Bugzilla still uses legacy code from JSON::RPC and despite the perl-JSON-RPC
package is installed, which makes checksetup.pl happy, the JSON-RPC feature of
Bugzilla fails because it cannot find the legacy code. This also prevents
Apache from starting when mod_perl is enabled:
httpd[1938]: Can't locate JSON/RPC/Legacy/Server/CGI.pm in @INC
So the legacy code is still required by Bugzilla, and checksetup.pl and
Bugzilla re confused by this package split.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994894
Bug ID: 994894
Summary: perl-Soot does not support ARM
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-SOOT
Assignee: ppisar(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com
Depends On: 991031
Blocks: 485251 (F-ExcludeArch-ARM)
perl-Soot requires root which does not support ARM (bug #991031). perl-Soot
will be disabled on ARM.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CKPzevCLAa&a=cc_unsubscribe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS: big endian bug in self checks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808197
Summary: FTBFS: big endian bug in self checks
Product: Fedora
Version: 17
Platform: powerpc
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: medium
Component: perl-Socket-Netlink
AssignedTo: bochecha(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: karsten(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com,
bochecha(a)fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Description of problem:
perl-Socket-Netlink fails to build on PPC as two of the self checks fail, one
of them looks like a big endian bug as the result has a swapped bit:
t/12netlink-message-header.t ..... ok
# Failed test '$message->attrs after unpack'
# at t/13netlink-message-attrs.t line 98.
# Structures begin differing at:
# $got->{str} = ''
# $expected->{str} = 'FGH'
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 14.
t/13netlink-message-attrs.t ......
Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 1/14 subtests
t/14netlink-message-error.t ...... ok
# Failed test '$message->pack'
# at t/20io-socket-netlink-generic.t line 55.
# at bytes 0-0xf (0-15)
# got: | 00 00 00 14 00 1e 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................|
# exp: | 00 00 00 14 00 00 00 1e 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................|
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 13.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-Socket-Netlink-0.03-4.fc17
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. ppc-koji build --scratch f17 perl-Socket-Netlink-0.03-4.fc17.src.rpm
2.
3.
Actual results:
http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=469988
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [PATCH] specfile accords to new packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671445
Summary: [PATCH] specfile accords to new packaging guidelines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: cpanspec
AssignedTo: steve(a)silug.org
ReportedBy: mmaslano(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: steve(a)silug.org, fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 474630
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=474630
add epel option
This patch should remove things, which are not needed according to new
packaging guidelines and latest rpm eg. defining buildroot. The old
behaviour is available under --epel option.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please build pcsc-perl for EPEL6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807793
Summary: Please build pcsc-perl for EPEL6
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: pcsc-perl
AssignedTo: tmraz(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: mjeanson(a)rlnx.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: tmraz(a)redhat.com, fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Hi,
I was hoping that you could build pcsc-perl for EPEL6.
I just tried a scratch build of the fc17 version and it builds without
modification within EPEL6.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3940535
Thanks,
Michael
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981243
Bug ID: 981243
Summary: SDLx::App->new() does not work on frame buffer console
Product: Fedora
Version: 18
Component: perl-SDL
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: hdegoede(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: hdegoede(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Created attachment 768694
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=768694&action=edit
Reproducer
I'm not able to initialize SDL video on frame buffer console using high-level
SDLx::App->new(). But it works with low-level SDL::Video::set_video_mode().
Output from the reproducer:
# DISPLAY= perl test -width 1280 -height 1024 -depth 32
Testing plain SDL:
Plain SDL::Video::set_video_mode() is Ok.
Width is 1280
Testing plain SDL::App:
Couldn't set console screen info at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/SDLx/App.pm
line 123.
SDLx::App::new('SDLx::App', '-width', 1280, '-height', 1024, '-depth',
32) called at test line 32
root@dhcp-0-146:/tmp # rpm -q perl-SDL
perl-SDL-2.540-2.fc18.x86_64
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GviunhawfM&a=cc_unsubscribe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204093
Summary: perl -i resets file ACLs and EAs
Product: Fedora Core
Version: fc5
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: perl
AssignedTo: rnorwood(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: josh(a)jbc.edu
QAContact: dkl(a)redhat.com
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
When perl's -i option is used to do an in-place edit of a file, it resets the
ACLs and extended attributes on that file.
Since perl -i can be a very helpful tool for scripting and system
administration, it would be nice if it preserved ACLs and EAs.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-5.8.8-5
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. touch testfile
2. setfacl -m u:testuser:r testfile
3. setfattr -n user.test testfile
4. perl -pi -e 's/Something/SomethingElse/' testfile
5. getfacl testfile; getfattr testfile
Actual results:
Nothing.
Expected results:
ACLs and EAs set in steps 2 and 3 above.
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.