[Bug 919030] New: perl-Glib-Object-Introspection seems to have a big-endian problem, self tests fail on s390* and ppc*
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919030
Bug ID: 919030
Summary: perl-Glib-Object-Introspection seems to have a
big-endian problem, self tests fail on s390* and ppc*
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Glib-Object-Introspection
Severity: high
Priority: medium
Reporter: karsten(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
# Failed test at t/00-basic-types.t line 15.
# got: '-1'
# expected: '-127'
# Failed test at t/00-basic-types.t line 16.
# got: '0'
# expected: '255'
# Failed test at t/00-basic-types.t line 17.
# got: '-1'
# expected: '-32767'
# Failed test at t/00-basic-types.t line 18.
# got: '0'
# expected: '65535'
# Looks like you failed 4 tests of 34.
t/00-basic-types.t ............
Dubious, test returned 4 (wstat 1024, 0x400)
Failed 4/34 subtests
# Failed test at t/arg-checks.t line 11.
# got: '-1'
# expected: '-127'
# Failed test at t/arg-checks.t line 21.
# got: '0'
# expected: '127'
# Looks like you failed 2 tests of 5.
t/arg-checks.t ................
Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-Glib-Object-Introspection-0.015-1.fc19
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. ppc-koji build --scratch f19
perl-Glib-Object-Introspection-0.015-1.fc19.src.rpm
2.
3.
Actual results:
http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=973021
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YIO2oILrQB&a=cc_unsubscribe
8 years, 10 months
[Bug 905112] New: Update to metacpan.org instead of search.cpan.org
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905112
Bug ID: 905112
Summary: Update to metacpan.org instead of search.cpan.org
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: cpanspec
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: berrange(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
To quote:
http://perlhacks.com/2013/01/give-me-metacpan/
"Ever since MetaCPAN launched I’ve been getting increasingly irritated with
people who still use links to search.cpan.org. Isn’t it obvious that MetaCPAN
is better? Why do people still insist on sharing links to the older site?
Of course they do it for various reasons. Perhaps they aren’t as in touch with
the modern Perl world as I am. Perhaps they are wary about changing to use the
new shiny toys because they know that a newer shinier one will be along soon.
Perhaps I’m reading a web page from five years ago and they can be forgiven for
not linking to a site that didn’t exist at the time."
Fedora can do its bit to help this, by making cpanspec use metacpan.org instead
of search.cpan.org for newly generated specfiles.
Once cpanspec is updated, a bulk search-replace on all existing Fedora Perl
specs may be considered.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
cpanspec-1.78-12.fc18.noarch
How reproducible:
N/A
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=feKMtj1zH9&a=cc_unsubscribe
8 years, 11 months