https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178357
Bug ID: 1178357
Summary: mojomojo-1.11 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: mojomojo
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: extras-orphan(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: extras-orphan(a)fedoraproject.org, iarnell(a)gmail.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Latest upstream release: 1.11
Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 1.10-6.fc22
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MojoMojo/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Soon this service
will be implemented by a new system: https://release-monitoring.org/
It will require to manage monitored projects via a new web interface. Please
make yourself familiar with the new system to ease the transition.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CS8rbtxkSS&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216928
Bug ID: 1216928
Summary: Wrong license declaration
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Net-DNS-SEC
Assignee: wjhns174(a)hardakers.net
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
pwouters(a)redhat.com, wjhns174(a)hardakers.net
perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23 declares the license as "GPL+ or Artistic".
However, there are many files covered by MIT license. For example SEC.pm:
=head1 LICENSE
Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its
documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby granted, provided
that the above copyright notice appear in all copies and that both that
copyright notice and this permission notice appear in supporting
documentation, and that the name of the author not be used in advertising
or publicity pertaining to distribution of the software without specific
prior written permission.
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL
THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER
DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1139141
Bug ID: 1139141
Summary: perl-Dumbbench-BoxPlot does not support ARM
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-SOOT
Assignee: ppisar(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com
Depends On: 994894
Blocks: 485251 (F-ExcludeArch-ARM)
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #994894 +++
perl-Soot requires root which does not support ARM (bug #991031). perl-Soot
will be disabled on ARM.
--- Additional comment from Petr Pisar on 2013-08-08 08:54:26 GMT ---
ARM support disabled in perl-SOOT-0.17-3.fc20.
---
perl-Dumbbench-BoxPlot run-requires perl-SOOT which is not available on ARM.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485251
[Bug 485251] ExcludeArch Tracker for ARM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994894
[Bug 994894] perl-Soot does not support ARM
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ShoZg0yQnv&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994894
Bug ID: 994894
Summary: perl-Soot does not support ARM
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-SOOT
Assignee: ppisar(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com
Depends On: 991031
Blocks: 485251 (F-ExcludeArch-ARM)
perl-Soot requires root which does not support ARM (bug #991031). perl-Soot
will be disabled on ARM.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CKPzevCLAa&a=cc_unsubscribe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS: big endian bug in self checks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808197
Summary: FTBFS: big endian bug in self checks
Product: Fedora
Version: 17
Platform: powerpc
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: medium
Component: perl-Socket-Netlink
AssignedTo: bochecha(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: karsten(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com,
bochecha(a)fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Description of problem:
perl-Socket-Netlink fails to build on PPC as two of the self checks fail, one
of them looks like a big endian bug as the result has a swapped bit:
t/12netlink-message-header.t ..... ok
# Failed test '$message->attrs after unpack'
# at t/13netlink-message-attrs.t line 98.
# Structures begin differing at:
# $got->{str} = ''
# $expected->{str} = 'FGH'
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 14.
t/13netlink-message-attrs.t ......
Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 1/14 subtests
t/14netlink-message-error.t ...... ok
# Failed test '$message->pack'
# at t/20io-socket-netlink-generic.t line 55.
# at bytes 0-0xf (0-15)
# got: | 00 00 00 14 00 1e 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................|
# exp: | 00 00 00 14 00 00 00 1e 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................|
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 13.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-Socket-Netlink-0.03-4.fc17
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. ppc-koji build --scratch f17 perl-Socket-Netlink-0.03-4.fc17.src.rpm
2.
3.
Actual results:
http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=469988
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [PATCH] specfile accords to new packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671445
Summary: [PATCH] specfile accords to new packaging guidelines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: cpanspec
AssignedTo: steve(a)silug.org
ReportedBy: mmaslano(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: steve(a)silug.org, fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 474630
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=474630
add epel option
This patch should remove things, which are not needed according to new
packaging guidelines and latest rpm eg. defining buildroot. The old
behaviour is available under --epel option.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please build pcsc-perl for EPEL6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807793
Summary: Please build pcsc-perl for EPEL6
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: pcsc-perl
AssignedTo: tmraz(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: mjeanson(a)rlnx.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: tmraz(a)redhat.com, fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Hi,
I was hoping that you could build pcsc-perl for EPEL6.
I just tried a scratch build of the fc17 version and it builds without
modification within EPEL6.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3940535
Thanks,
Michael
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078438
Bug ID: 1078438
Summary: Templated types are causing "Could not find a typemap
for C type"
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Version: 7.0
Component: perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS
Assignee: perl-maint-list(a)redhat.com
Reporter: mhroncok(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: qe-baseos-apps(a)redhat.com
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com
Depends On: 1032181
Blocks: 1032056
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1032181 +++
Description of problem:
When using perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS to build XS stuff (I don't know the
terminology here, sorry), errors like this happens:
https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=86367
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS-3.18-291.fc20.noarch
How reproducible:
Happend when building slic3r-xs
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Get slic3r tarball from
https://github.com/alexrj/Slic3r/archive/1.0.0RC1.tar.gz
2. unpack && cd Slic3r-1.0.0RC1/xs/ # be usre to be in xs folder
3. perl Build.PL && ./Build
Actual results:
<snip>
Could not find a typemap for C type 'std::vector< double >'.
The following C types are mapped by the current typemap:
'AV *', <snip>, 'wchar_t *'
in /usr/bin/perl -MExtUtils::XSpp::Cmd -e xspp -- -t
"/home/churchyard/Stažené/Slic3r-1.0.0RC1/xs/xsp/typemap.xspt"
"/home/churchyard/Stažené/Slic3r-1.0.0RC1/xs/xsp/TriangleMesh.xsp", line 138
Expected results:
No errors, just warnings
Additional info:
This is fixed in upstream release 3.22 and also in development release 3.18_03.
Fix is in Bug #1032181.
See the error in this build.log:
http://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/churchyard/epel7-3dprint/epe…
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032056
[Bug 1032056] Slic3r 1.0.0RC1 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032181
[Bug 1032181] Templated types are causing "Could not find a typemap for C
type"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ujbL1yHik6&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101265
Bug ID: 1101265
Summary: perl-libwww-perl: incorrect handling of SSL
certificate verification [fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
Version: 20
Component: perl-LWP-Protocol-https
Keywords: FutureFeature
Severity: high
Priority: high
Assignee: ppisar(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jpazdziora(a)redhat.com, jplesnik(a)redhat.com,
mmaslano(a)redhat.com, mzazrivec(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com,
psabata(a)redhat.com
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1094442 +++
[...]
--- Additional comment from Jan Pazdziora on 2014-05-26 10:55:43 GMT ---
(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #9)
> Thank you for the report. However there are two mistakes:
>
> (1) The IO::Socket::SSL::new option is "SSL_verifycn_scheme", not
> "SSL_verifycn_schema". Thus you could not find it in the documentation.
Ahh, sorry about that
.
> (2) The 6.04-3 behavior was flawed. As you can read in the upstream bug
> report, the "SSL_verify_mode" option is about checking hostname. It's not
> intended to control certificate validation. The same applies to
> "PERL_LWP_SSL_VERIFY_HOSTNAME" environment variable. 6.04-4 has restored the
> behavior which presented before 6.04.
So what is the way for making HTTP requests to websites with self-signed
certificates from perl, if the user does not care about the CA chain
validation?
In other way, what is the way for making LWP behave the same way it used to
behave with pre-6 version?
--- Additional comment from Petr Pisar on 2014-05-26 11:20:51 GMT ---
There is no LWP environment variable or command line option to control that
currently.
It's possible to pass ssl_opts => {SSL_verify_mode =>
IO::Socket::SSL::SSL_VERIFY_NONE} to LWP::UserAgent::new if you write your own
LWP application.
This is also discussed in the upstream report.
The reason why the PERL_LWP_SSL_VERIFY_HOSTNAME seemed to work before is the
IO::Socket::SSL < 1.950 defaulted to SSL_VERIFY_NONE. This has not been true
since Fedora 20. Unfortunately Fedora 20 delivered the flawed
LWP::Protocol::https, so it was not visible.
I agree with you that there should be way how to disable the certificate
validation externally.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=vNjL2yMVw5&a=cc_unsubscribe