https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392478
Bug ID: 1392478
Summary: root is not built for ppc64le
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Alien-ROOT
Assignee: ppisar(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377996
Bug ID: 1377996
Summary: perl-libxml-perl: Expanding external entities by
default
Product: Security Response
Component: vulnerability
Keywords: Security
Severity: high
Priority: high
Assignee: security-response-team(a)redhat.com
Reporter: amaris(a)redhat.com
CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
perl-maint-list(a)redhat.com, ppisar(a)redhat.com,
psabata(a)redhat.com
It was found that XML::LibXML is vulnerable to XXE attack as it has enabled
external entity loading by default.
Bug report:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=838097
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029710
Bug ID: 1029710
Summary: Amavisd fails to identify attached zipped files with
.exe extensions
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: el6
Component: amavisd-new
Severity: medium
Assignee: steve(a)silug.org
Reporter: s10dal(a)elrepo.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: janfrode(a)tanso.net, kanarip(a)kanarip.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, steve(a)silug.org
Description of problem:
Mail attachments containing zipped files with .exe extensions are not properly
identified due to a failure of 7za (p7zip) as called by amavisd to correctly
list the contents of the zipped file. Based on maillog errors, the failure
appears to be due to an improperly composed 7za option, specifically -w not
being separated from the target by a separator (e.g., space character).
Manually executing 7za using the options noted in the maillog error (see below)
demonstrates the need to insert a separator between the -w option and the
target.
Fails: $ 7za l -slt -w./contains_exe.zip
Works: $ 7za l -slt -w ./contains_exe.zip
Also, this issue may be specific to EL6. This issue came to my attention
because an EL6 mail server acting as a Backup MX for an EL5 mail server was
forwarding zipped exe attachments, which were correctly identified and
quarantined on the EL5 system.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
# uname -rpmi
2.6.32-358.23.2.el6.i686 i686 i686 i386
# rpm -q amavisd-new p7zip
amavisd-new-2.8.0-4.el6.noarch
p7zip-9.20.1-2.el6.i686
How reproducible:
Very. Observed on 3 EL6 mail servers.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install/configure postfix, amavisd-new, clam\*, etc.
2. Create a test attachment:
$ touch test.exe
$ 7za a -tzip test_exe.zip test.exe
3. Send a mail with test_exe.zip attached
4. Check /var/log/maillog for the specific error
Actual results:
From /var/log/maillog:
Nov 12 17:17:46 Mail amavis[1568]: (28807-12) (!)run_command: child process
[1568]: run_command: failed to exec /usr/bin/7za l -slt
-w/var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20131112T051218-28807-HPbWePoN/parts --
/var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20131112T051218-28807-HPbWePoN/parts/p002: 13 at
/usr/sbin/amavisd line 4062.
Nov 12 17:17:46 Mail amavis[28807]: (28807-12) (!)Decoding of p002 (Zip archive
data, at least v1.0 to extract) failed, leaving it unpacked: do_7zip: can't get
a list of archive members: exit 6; at (eval 117) line 781.
Expected results:
Identify zipped exe file as such.
Additional info:
It may not be relevant to the observed error, but 8 months ago, amavisd-new and
clam\* were converted from RepoForge/RPMforge versions to EPEL versions. Except
for a few initial hiccups, the mail servers have been running without apparent
issues until the current 7za issue was observed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=KMKdGzsZdn&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283764
Bug ID: 1283764
Summary: Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/File/Tail.pm line 391
Product: Fedora
Version: 23
Component: perl-File-Tail
Assignee: tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Reporter: h.reindl(a)thelounge.net
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Nov 19 12:20:09 testserver perl: Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==)
at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/File/Tail.pm line 391
i guess mailgraph triggers that bug
[root@testserver:~]$ rpm -q --file /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/File/Tail.pm
perl-File-Tail-1.3-1.fc23.noarch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378895
Bug ID: 1378895
Summary: 8-bpp TIFF images are broken in the resulting PDF
document
Product: Fedora
Version: 23
Component: perl-PDF-API2
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: bjohnson(a)symetrix.com, jplesnik(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 1369984
External Bug ID: CPAN 118047
Created attachment 1204154
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1204154&action=edit
8-bpp TIFF image
This code creates an PDF with broken 8-bpp TIFF image:
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
use PDF::API2;
my $pdf = PDF::API2->new(-file => 'out.pdf');
my $page = $pdf->page;
$page->mediabox(157, 196);
my $imgobj = $pdf->image_tiff('8.tiff');
my $gfx = $page->gfx;
$gfx->image($imgobj, 0, 0, 157, 196);
$pdf->save;
$pdf->end;
It works fine if the TIFF image has only 1 bit per pixel. I have
perl-PDF-API2-2.025-1.fc23.noarch, but it it's broken in all Fedoras.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369984
[Bug 1369984] gscan2pdf v1.3.8 saves imported PDF pages as negative images
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335443
Bug ID: 1335443
Summary: Net::SSLeay produces a warning on EOF
Product: Fedora
Version: 22
Component: perl-Net-SSLeay
Severity: low
Assignee: paul(a)city-fan.org
Reporter: lav(a)yars.free.net
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jose.p.oliveira.oss(a)gmail.com, kasal(a)ucw.cz,
paul(a)city-fan.org, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Created attachment 1156525
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1156525&action=edit
proposed fix
Description of problem:
I repeatedly get this warning from Net::SSLeay:
Use of uninitialized value $got in string eq at blib/lib/Net/SSLeay.pm
(autosplit into blib/lib/auto/Net/SSLeay/ssl_read_all.al) line 549.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-Net-SSLeay-1.68-1.fc22.x86_64
Expected results:
no warnings
Additional info:
a patch is attached.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336403
Bug ID: 1336403
Summary: perl-Email-Abstract-3.008-4.fc25 FTBS:
t/abstractions.t test fails: Failed test 'correct
stringification of Mail::Internet; same as reference
object'
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Email-Abstract
Assignee: tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
tcallawa(a)redhat.com
perl-Email-Abstract-3.008-4.fc25 fails to build in F25 because tests fail:
/00-report-prereqs.t .. ok
# testing Email::MIME with 1.937
# testing Email::Simple with 2.210
# testing MIME::Entity with 5.507
# testing Mail::Internet with 2.17
# Failed test 'correct stringification of Mail::Internet; same as reference
object'
# at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 74.
# got: ''
# expected: 'Joanna, All
#
# Thanks. I got the following response from Fred Tydeman.
#
# On Nov 13, 9:56am in "Re: Defect in XBD lr", Joanna Farley wrote:
# > Sun's expert in this area after some discussions with a colleague
# > outside of Sun concluded that for lround, to align with both C99 and SUS
# > changes of the following form were necessary:
# > this line of text is really long and no one need worry about it but why was
such a long text chosen to begin with i mean really??
#
# -----
# Andrew Josey The Open Group
# Austin Group Chair Apex Plaza,Forbury Road,
# Email: a.josey(a)opengroup.org Reading,Berks.RG1 1AX,England
# Tel: +44 118 9508311 ext 2250 Fax: +44 118 9500110'
# Failed test 'correct body length for Mail::Internet'
# at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 80.
# got: '0'
# expected: '749'
# Failed test 'correct stringification of Mail::Internet; same as reference
object'
# at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 74.
# got: ''
# expected: 'Joanna, All
#
# Thanks. I got the following response from Fred Tydeman.
#
# On Nov 13, 9:56am in "Re: Defect in XBD lr", Joanna Farley wrote:
# > Sun's expert in this area after some discussions with a colleague
# > outside of Sun concluded that for lround, to align with both C99 and SUS
# > changes of the following form were necessary:
# > this line of text is really long and no one need worry about it but why was
such a long text chosen to begin with i mean really??
#
# -----
# Andrew Josey The Open Group
# Austin Group Chair Apex Plaza,Forbury Road,
# Email: a.josey(a)opengroup.org Reading,Berks.RG1 1AX,England
# Tel: +44 118 9508311 ext 2250 Fax: +44 118 9500110'
# Failed test 'correct body length for Mail::Internet'
# at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 80.
# got: '0'
# expected: '749'
# Failed test 'correct stringification of Mail::Internet; same as reference
object'
# at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 74.
# got: ''
# expected: 'Joanna, All
#
# Thanks. I got the following response from Fred Tydeman.
#
# On Nov 13, 9:56am in "Re: Defect in XBD lr", Joanna Farley wrote:
# > Sun's expert in this area after some discussions with a colleague
# > outside of Sun concluded that for lround, to align with both C99 and SUS
# > changes of the following form were necessary:
# > this line of text is really long and no one need worry about it but why was
such a long text chosen to begin with i mean really??
#
# -----
# Andrew Josey The Open Group
# Austin Group Chair Apex Plaza,Forbury Road,
# Email: a.josey(a)opengroup.org Reading,Berks.RG1 1AX,England
# Tel: +44 118 9508311 ext 2250 Fax: +44 118 9500110'
# Failed test 'correct body length for Mail::Internet'
# at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 80.
# got: '0'
# expected: '749'
# testing Mail::Message with 2.118
# testing MIME::Entity with 5.507
# testing Email::MIME with 1.937
# Looks like you failed 6 tests of 165.
t/abstractions.t .......
Dubious, test returned 6 (wstat 1536, 0x600)
Failed 6/165 subtests
This is caused by upgrading perl-MailTools from 2.16-1.fc25 to 2.17-1.fc25.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397732
Bug ID: 1397732
Summary: CVE-2015-8978 perl-SOAP-Lite: XML exponential entity
expansion denial-of-service [epel-all]
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: el6
Component: perl-SOAP-Lite
Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: andrea.veri(a)gmail.com
Reporter: anemec(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: andrea.veri(a)gmail.com, emmanuel(a)seyman.fr,
janfrode(a)tanso.net, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 1397731 (CVE-2015-8978)
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of Fedora EPEL.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
fedpkg commit message.
NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora EPEL. While
only one tracking bug has been filed, please correct all affected versions
at the same time. If you need to fix the versions independent of each
other, you may clone this bug as appropriate.
[bug automatically created by: add-tracking-bugs]
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397731
[Bug 1397731] CVE-2015-8978 perl-SOAP-Lite: XML exponential entity
expansion denial-of-service
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1393834
Bug ID: 1393834
Summary: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit-1.05-17.fc26 FTBFS on ppc64le:
Can't call method "element" on an undefined value
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 1051573 (F-ExcludeArch-ppc64le,PPC64LETracker)
External Bug ID: CPAN 118695
perl-Algorithm-CurveFit-1.05-17.fc26 fails to build on ppc64le:
t/01basic.t ...... ok
Can't call method "element" on an undefined value at
/builddir/build/BUILD/Algorithm-CurveFit-1.05/blib/lib/Algorithm/CurveFit.pm
line 217.
# Looks like your test exited with 255 before it could output anything.
t/02bad_deriv.t ..
Dubious, test returned 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00)
Failed 13/13 subtests
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051573
[Bug 1051573] ppc64le tracker bug
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.