perl-devel November 2016

perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

6 participants
1515 discussions

[Bug 1379553] New: perl-XML-Twig: expand_external_ents option fails to work as documented
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Jul '17

26 Jul '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379553 Bug ID: 1379553 Summary: perl-XML-Twig: expand_external_ents option fails to work as documented Product: Security Response Component: vulnerability Keywords: Security Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: security-response-team(a)redhat.com Reporter: dmoppert(a)redhat.com CC: cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu, jplesnik(a)redhat.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, perl-maint-list(a)redhat.com, ppisar(a)redhat.com, psabata(a)redhat.com The option to `expand_external_ents`, documented as controlling external entity expansion in XML::Twig does not work. External entities are always expanded, regardless of the option's setting. Upstream bug: https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=118097 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 10

[Bug 1259386] New: perl-XML-Merge-1.2.565EgGd-20.fc24 FTBFS: Can't convert '1.12.B55J2qn': Invalid version format (non-numeric data)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Jul '17

26 Jul '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259386 Bug ID: 1259386 Summary: perl-XML-Merge-1.2.565EgGd-20.fc24 FTBFS: Can't convert '1.12.B55J2qn': Invalid version format (non-numeric data) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-XML-Merge Assignee: xavier(a)bachelot.org Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, xavier(a)bachelot.org perl-XML-Merge-1.2.565EgGd-20.fc24 fails to build in F24: Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.oC1E58 + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd XML-Merge-1.2.565EgGd + /usr/bin/perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor Can't convert '1.12.B55J2qn': Invalid version format (non-numeric data) Checking if your kit is complete... Looks good error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.oC1E58 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.oC1E58 (%build) Difference between working and failing build root: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker 7.04-346.fc23 > 7.06-2.fc24 perl-ExtUtils-Command 1.20-346.fc23 > 7.06-2.fc24 glib2 2.45.6-1.fc24 > 2.45.7-1.fc24 python3-dnf-plugins-core 0.1.10-1.fc24 > 0.1.11-1.fc24 dnf-plugins-core 0.1.10-1.fc24 > 0.1.11-1.fc24 libgpg-error 1.19-2.fc23 > 1.20-1.fc24 gdb 7.10-15.fc24 > 7.10-16.fc24 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 8

[Bug 1224294] New: perl-OpenGL-0.6702-4.fc23 FTBFS: undefined symbol: glWindowPos4dMESA
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Jul '17

26 Jul '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224294 Bug ID: 1224294 Summary: perl-OpenGL-0.6702-4.fc23 FTBFS: undefined symbol: glWindowPos4dMESA Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-OpenGL Assignee: lkundrak(a)v3.sk Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: filip(a)andresovi.net, lkundrak(a)v3.sk, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, scenek(a)gmail.com perl-OpenGL-0.6702-4.fc23 fails to build in F23 because tests fail on linking with Mesa OpenGL library: + make test "/usr/bin/perl" "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-MTest::Harness" "-e" "undef *Test::Harness::Switches; test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t # Failed test 'require OpenGL;' # at t/00_require.t line 3. # Tried to require 'OpenGL'. # Error: Can't load '/builddir/build/BUILD/OpenGL-0.6702/blib/arch/auto/OpenGL/OpenGL.so' for module OpenGL: /builddir/build/BUILD/OpenGL-0.6702/blib/arch/auto/OpenGL/OpenGL.so: undefined symbol: glWindowPos4dMESA at /usr/lib64/perl5/DynaLoader.pm line 193. # at (eval 4) line 2. # Compilation failed in require at (eval 4) line 2. # Looks like you failed 1 test of 1. t/00_require.t ....... Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) Failed 1/1 subtests This is caused by upgrading mesa-libGL-devel from 10.6.0-0.devel.5.51e3453 to 10.6.0-0.devel.6.5a55f68. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 6

[Bug 984185] New: perl should be a hardened build
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Jul '17

26 Jul '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984185 Bug ID: 984185 Summary: perl should be a hardened build Product: Fedora Version: 18 Component: perl Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: mmaslano(a)redhat.com Reporter: h.reindl(a)thelounge.net QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu, iarnell(a)gmail.com, jplesnik(a)redhat.com, kasal(a)ucw.cz, mmaslano(a)redhat.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com, psabata(a)redhat.com, rc040203(a)freenet.de, tcallawa(a)redhat.com perl is often used for long running services (mailgraph, smokeping, postgrey..) as well as called from webservers with untrusted input so it should be "Full RELRO" and PIE http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#PIE ______________________________________________________ If your package meets any of the following criteria you MUST enable the PIE compiler flags: Your package is long running. This means it's likely to be started and keep running until the machine is rebooted, not start on demand and quit on idle. Your package has suid binaries, or binaries with capabilities. Your package runs as root. If your package meets the following criteria you should consider enabling the PIE compiler flags: Your package accepts/processes untrusted input. ______________________________________________________ [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ checksec --file /usr/bin/perl RELRO STACK CANARY NX PIE RPATH RUNPATH FILE Partial RELRO Canary found NX enabled No PIE RPATH RUNPATH /usr/bin/perl -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YABEZK214w&a=cc_unsubscribe

2 11

[Bug 1373410] New: Please port to WebKit2
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Jul '17

25 Jul '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373410 Bug ID: 1373410 Summary: Please port to WebKit2 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Gtk3-WebKit Assignee: ddick(a)cpan.org Reporter: rhbz(a)genodeftest.de QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ddick(a)cpan.org, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Description of problem: Currently, perl-Gtk3-WebKit is based on webkitgtk3, which is WebKit1 on Gtk3. There are plans to remove WebKit1 from Fedora 27+ [1]. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): all current versions How reproducible: always Actual results: perl-Gtk3-WebKit is compiled against webkitgtk3(-devel) Expected results: perl-Gtk3-WebKit should be compiled against webkitgtk4(-devel) Additional info: In case the API differs too much you might want to add another package, e.g. named perl-Gtk3-WebKit2, which is compiled against webkitgtk4(-devel) and deprecate the old one. [1] See https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org… and a mass bug filing announcement on https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 5

[Bug 1265922] New: amavisd and clamav dependencies
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jul '17

19 Jul '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265922 Bug ID: 1265922 Summary: amavisd and clamav dependencies Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel7 Component: amavisd-new Severity: low Assignee: j.orti.alcaine(a)gmail.com Reporter: sistemisti-posta(a)csi.it QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: janfrode(a)tanso.net, j.orti.alcaine(a)gmail.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, steve(a)silug.org, vanmeeuwen+fedora(a)kolabsys.com Description of problem: I have amavisd-new without local clamd server, because I configured it remotely through instream protocol. I very appreciate if you could leave clamav and altermime dependencies. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): amavisd-new-2.10.1-4.el7 Now I forcedly removed clamav, but it is not good: ** Found 3 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output follows: amavisd-new-2.10.1-4.el7.noarch has missing requires of altermime amavisd-new-2.10.1-4.el7.noarch has missing requires of clamav-server amavisd-new-2.10.1-4.el7.noarch has missing requires of clamav-server-systemd Thanks a lot -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 11

[Bug 1399246] New: wrong permission on /usr/share/doc/perl-Mail-SPF/bin/ spfquery
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Jun '17

10 Jun '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1399246 Bug ID: 1399246 Summary: wrong permission on /usr/share/doc/perl-Mail-SPF/bin/spfquery Product: Fedora Version: 24 Component: perl-Mail-SPF Severity: medium Assignee: jpazdziora(a)redhat.com Reporter: customercare(a)resellerdesktop.de QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: jpazdziora(a)redhat.com, nb(a)fedoraproject.org, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, steve(a)silug.org Description of problem: /usr/share/doc/perl-Mail-SPF/bin/spfquery comes with root executeable permissions. If it shall be used by exim or any other non-root mailserver, it needs o+x or g+x and a new group with exim etc. Eitherway those "temporary" Solutions by admins get deleted with an update/upgrade of the package. Suggested Solution: chmod o+x /usr/share/doc/perl-Mail-SPF/bin/spfquery Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-Mail-SPF-2.9.0-7.fc23.noarch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 13

[Bug 1331825] New: perl-Net-Server should depend on perl-IO-Socket-INET6
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jun '17

09 Jun '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331825 Bug ID: 1331825 Summary: perl-Net-Server should depend on perl-IO-Socket-INET6 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel7 Component: perl-Net-Server Assignee: lkundrak(a)v3.sk Reporter: roy(a)karlsbakk.net QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: kevin(a)scrye.com, lkundrak(a)v3.sk, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Description of problem: With systems like munin-node, it's unable to listen to IPv6 unless perl-IO-Socket-INET6 is installed manually. There really isn't a good reason to keep this out, since IPv6 is getting rather common these days Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Current RHEL/CentOS 7 as of 2016-04-29 How reproducible: Every time Steps to Reproduce: 1. Try to bind to IPv6 with perl-Net-Server 2. 3. Actual results: Fails Expected results: Succeeds Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 14

[Bug 1268828] New: RFE: On 32 bit platforms, enable -Duse64bitint and maybe also -Duselongdouble
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Jun '17

06 Jun '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268828 Bug ID: 1268828 Summary: RFE: On 32 bit platforms, enable -Duse64bitint and maybe also -Duselongdouble Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com Reporter: rjones(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu, iarnell(a)gmail.com, jplesnik(a)redhat.com, kasal(a)ucw.cz, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com, psabata(a)redhat.com, rc040203(a)freenet.de, tcallawa(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Perl on Fedora 32 bit platforms uses 32 bit ints, and on 64 bit platforms uses 64 bit ints. This causes some problems when we express size-in-bytes in some programs -- it is easy for these kind of programs to work fine on the common 64 bit platform, but to fail to work in bad ways (rounding errors or overflows) on 32 bit. Since 32 bit is comparatively rare, these bugs can go unnoticed. An example of a program that will fail like this is: http://git.annexia.org/?p=import-to-ovirt.git;a=tree Also, Debian (since Wheezy) has enabled this option, so by making this change we would be consistent with Debian & Ubuntu. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=310995 Some pros and cons described here: http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters/2010/04/msg158984.html There is also interaction with another option (-Duselongdouble). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-5.22.0-350.fc24 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 10

[Bug 1309675] New: perl-DBD-SQLite-1.50-1.fc24 FTBFS: t/43_fts3.t test fails
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 May '17

25 May '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309675 Bug ID: 1309675 Summary: perl-DBD-SQLite-1.50-1.fc24 FTBFS: t/43_fts3.t test fails Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-DBD-SQLite Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com, mmaslano(a)redhat.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com, steve(a)silug.org perl-DBD-SQLite-1.50-1.fc24 fails to build in F24 because of rebased sqlite that disabled ENABLE_FTS3_TOKENIZER: t/42_primary_key_info.t ............................... ok DBD::SQLite::db do failed: unknown tokenizer: perl at t/43_fts3.t line 87. # Failed test 'no warnings' # at inc/Test/NoWarnings.pm line 38. # There were 1 warning(s) # Previous test 1 'An object of class 'DBI::db' isa 'DBI::db'' # DBD::SQLite::db do failed: unknown tokenizer: perl at t/43_fts3.t line 87. # at t/43_fts3.t line 87. # # Looks like you planned 35 tests but ran 2. # Looks like you failed 1 test of 2 run. # Looks like your test exited with 255 just after 2. t/43_fts3.t ........................................... Dubious, test returned 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00) Failed 34/35 subtests Difference between working and failing build root: sqlite-devel 3.10.2-3.fc24 > 3.11.0-1.fc24 glibc 2.22.90-35.fc24 > 2.22.90-36.fc24 sqlite 3.10.2-3.fc24 > 3.11.0-1.fc24 sqlite-libs 3.10.2-3.fc24 > 3.11.0-1.fc24 glibc-common 2.22.90-35.fc24 > 2.22.90-36.fc24 krb5-libs 1.14-20.fc24 > 1.14-21.fc24 glibc-devel 2.22.90-35.fc24 > 2.22.90-36.fc24 systemd-libs 229-1.fc24 > 229-2.fc24 gdb 7.10.90.20160211-52.fc24 > 7.10.90.20160216-54.fc24 libicu 56.1-1.fc24 > 56.1-3.fc24 kernel-headers 4.5.0-0.rc3.git3.1.... > 4.5.0-0.rc4.git0.1.... binutils 2.26-10.fc24 > 2.26-11.fc24 glibc-headers 2.22.90-35.fc24 > 2.22.90-36.fc24 lzo 2.08-6.fc24 > 2.08-7.fc24 systemd 229-1.fc24 > 229-2.fc24 gnupg2 2.1.10-4.fc24 > 2.1.11-1.fc24 python3-pyparsing 2.1.0-1.fc24 > 2.1.0-2.fc24 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 15

← Newer
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
152
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

perl-devel November 2016