[Bug 1336403] New: perl-Email-Abstract-3.008-4.fc25 FTBS:
t/abstractions.t test fails: Failed test 'correct stringification of
Mail::Internet; same as reference object'
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336403
Bug ID: 1336403
Summary: perl-Email-Abstract-3.008-4.fc25 FTBS:
t/abstractions.t test fails: Failed test 'correct
stringification of Mail::Internet; same as reference
object'
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Email-Abstract
Assignee: tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
tcallawa(a)redhat.com
perl-Email-Abstract-3.008-4.fc25 fails to build in F25 because tests fail:
/00-report-prereqs.t .. ok
# testing Email::MIME with 1.937
# testing Email::Simple with 2.210
# testing MIME::Entity with 5.507
# testing Mail::Internet with 2.17
# Failed test 'correct stringification of Mail::Internet; same as reference
object'
# at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 74.
# got: ''
# expected: 'Joanna, All
#
# Thanks. I got the following response from Fred Tydeman.
#
# On Nov 13, 9:56am in "Re: Defect in XBD lr", Joanna Farley wrote:
# > Sun's expert in this area after some discussions with a colleague
# > outside of Sun concluded that for lround, to align with both C99 and SUS
# > changes of the following form were necessary:
# > this line of text is really long and no one need worry about it but why was
such a long text chosen to begin with i mean really??
#
# -----
# Andrew Josey The Open Group
# Austin Group Chair Apex Plaza,Forbury Road,
# Email: a.josey(a)opengroup.org Reading,Berks.RG1 1AX,England
# Tel: +44 118 9508311 ext 2250 Fax: +44 118 9500110'
# Failed test 'correct body length for Mail::Internet'
# at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 80.
# got: '0'
# expected: '749'
# Failed test 'correct stringification of Mail::Internet; same as reference
object'
# at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 74.
# got: ''
# expected: 'Joanna, All
#
# Thanks. I got the following response from Fred Tydeman.
#
# On Nov 13, 9:56am in "Re: Defect in XBD lr", Joanna Farley wrote:
# > Sun's expert in this area after some discussions with a colleague
# > outside of Sun concluded that for lround, to align with both C99 and SUS
# > changes of the following form were necessary:
# > this line of text is really long and no one need worry about it but why was
such a long text chosen to begin with i mean really??
#
# -----
# Andrew Josey The Open Group
# Austin Group Chair Apex Plaza,Forbury Road,
# Email: a.josey(a)opengroup.org Reading,Berks.RG1 1AX,England
# Tel: +44 118 9508311 ext 2250 Fax: +44 118 9500110'
# Failed test 'correct body length for Mail::Internet'
# at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 80.
# got: '0'
# expected: '749'
# Failed test 'correct stringification of Mail::Internet; same as reference
object'
# at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 74.
# got: ''
# expected: 'Joanna, All
#
# Thanks. I got the following response from Fred Tydeman.
#
# On Nov 13, 9:56am in "Re: Defect in XBD lr", Joanna Farley wrote:
# > Sun's expert in this area after some discussions with a colleague
# > outside of Sun concluded that for lround, to align with both C99 and SUS
# > changes of the following form were necessary:
# > this line of text is really long and no one need worry about it but why was
such a long text chosen to begin with i mean really??
#
# -----
# Andrew Josey The Open Group
# Austin Group Chair Apex Plaza,Forbury Road,
# Email: a.josey(a)opengroup.org Reading,Berks.RG1 1AX,England
# Tel: +44 118 9508311 ext 2250 Fax: +44 118 9500110'
# Failed test 'correct body length for Mail::Internet'
# at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 80.
# got: '0'
# expected: '749'
# testing Mail::Message with 2.118
# testing MIME::Entity with 5.507
# testing Email::MIME with 1.937
# Looks like you failed 6 tests of 165.
t/abstractions.t .......
Dubious, test returned 6 (wstat 1536, 0x600)
Failed 6/165 subtests
This is caused by upgrading perl-MailTools from 2.16-1.fc25 to 2.17-1.fc25.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 5 months
[Bug 1397732] New: CVE-2015-8978 perl-SOAP-Lite:
XML exponential entity expansion denial-of-service [epel-all]
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397732
Bug ID: 1397732
Summary: CVE-2015-8978 perl-SOAP-Lite: XML exponential entity
expansion denial-of-service [epel-all]
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: el6
Component: perl-SOAP-Lite
Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: andrea.veri(a)gmail.com
Reporter: anemec(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: andrea.veri(a)gmail.com, emmanuel(a)seyman.fr,
janfrode(a)tanso.net, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 1397731 (CVE-2015-8978)
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of Fedora EPEL.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
fedpkg commit message.
NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora EPEL. While
only one tracking bug has been filed, please correct all affected versions
at the same time. If you need to fix the versions independent of each
other, you may clone this bug as appropriate.
[bug automatically created by: add-tracking-bugs]
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397731
[Bug 1397731] CVE-2015-8978 perl-SOAP-Lite: XML exponential entity
expansion denial-of-service
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 6 months
[Bug 1393834] New: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit-1.05-17.fc26 FTBFS on
ppc64le:
Can't call method "element" on an undefined value
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1393834
Bug ID: 1393834
Summary: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit-1.05-17.fc26 FTBFS on ppc64le:
Can't call method "element" on an undefined value
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 1051573 (F-ExcludeArch-ppc64le,PPC64LETracker)
External Bug ID: CPAN 118695
perl-Algorithm-CurveFit-1.05-17.fc26 fails to build on ppc64le:
t/01basic.t ...... ok
Can't call method "element" on an undefined value at
/builddir/build/BUILD/Algorithm-CurveFit-1.05/blib/lib/Algorithm/CurveFit.pm
line 217.
# Looks like your test exited with 255 before it could output anything.
t/02bad_deriv.t ..
Dubious, test returned 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00)
Failed 13/13 subtests
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051573
[Bug 1051573] ppc64le tracker bug
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 7 months
[Bug 1242769] New: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit-1.05-14.fc23 FTBFS: Failed test at t/02bad_deriv.t line 50
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242769
Bug ID: 1242769
Summary: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit-1.05-14.fc23 FTBFS: Failed
test at t/02bad_deriv.t line 50
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
perl-Algorithm-CurveFit-1.05-14.fc23 fails to build in F23 because tests fail:
t/01basic.t ...... ok
# Failed test at t/02bad_deriv.t line 50.
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 13.
t/02bad_deriv.t ..
Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 1/13 subtests
Verbose test output:
$ prove -b -v t/02bad_deriv.t
t/02bad_deriv.t ..
1..13
ok 1
ok 2
not ok 3
# Failed test at t/02bad_deriv.t line 50.
ok 4
ok 5
ok 6
ok 7
ok 8
ok 9
ok 10
ok 11
ok 12
ok 13
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 13.
Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 1/13 subtests
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 7 months
[Bug 1326387] New: EPEL7 branch request for perl-Data-HexDump
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326387
Bug ID: 1326387
Summary: EPEL7 branch request for perl-Data-HexDump
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Data-HexDump
Assignee: andreas(a)bawue.net
Reporter: esandeen(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: andreas(a)bawue.net, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi, I'd like to look into packaging ncid for EPEL7; there is one tool in the
package which requires perl-Data-HexDump. If you'd be willing to create an
EPEL7 branch for perl-Data-HexDump, that would be great.
If not, I'd be happy to own that branch, or simply remove the one tool from the
ncid package which requires it.
Thanks,
-Eric
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 8 months
[Bug 1378713] New: [abrt] slic3r: wxTopLevelWindowGTK::
RequestUserAttention(): perl killed by SIGSEGV
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378713
Bug ID: 1378713
Summary: [abrt] slic3r:
wxTopLevelWindowGTK::RequestUserAttention(): perl
killed by SIGSEGV
Product: Fedora
Version: 24
Component: slic3r
Assignee: mhroncok(a)redhat.com
Reporter: bugzilla(a)isengard.at
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: mhroncok(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Description of problem:
Just closed the application without saving configuration.
Version-Release number of selected component:
slic3r-1.2.9-8.fc24
Additional info:
reporter: libreport-2.7.2
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline: perl /usr/bin/slic3r
crash_function: wxTopLevelWindowGTK::RequestUserAttention
executable: /usr/bin/perl
global_pid: 3473
kernel: 4.7.4-200.fc24.x86_64
pkg_fingerprint: 73BD E983 81B4 6521
pkg_vendor: Fedora Project
runlevel: N 5
type: CCpp
uid: 1000
Truncated backtrace:
Thread no. 1 (10 frames)
#0 wxTopLevelWindowGTK::RequestUserAttention at src/gtk/toplevel.cpp:1411
#1 XS_Wx__TopLevelWindow_RequestUserAttention at Frames.c:6219
#2 Perl_pp_entersub at pp_hot.c:3272
#3 Perl_runops_standard at run.c:41
#4 Perl_call_sv at perl.c:2769
#5 wxPliEventCallback::Handler at cpp/e_cback.cpp:93
#6 wxEvtHandler::ProcessEventIfMatches at src/common/event.cpp:1239
#7 wxEvtHandler::SearchDynamicEventTable at src/common/event.cpp:1421
#8 wxEvtHandler::ProcessEvent at src/common/event.cpp:1297
#9 wxWindowBase::TryParent at src/common/wincmn.cpp:2661
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 8 months
[Bug 1288914] New: RT package is missing database schemas
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288914
Bug ID: 1288914
Summary: RT package is missing database schemas
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: rt
Assignee: rc040203(a)freenet.de
Reporter: lars(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rc040203(a)freenet.de, tibbs(a)math.uh.edu
Description of problem:
I was trying to install RT on Fedora using a Postgres database, only to
discover that the package only includes the MySQL schema files and explicitly
excludes the schema files for Postgres, Oracle, and SQLite.
Unless there is a good reason to exclude some or all of the schema files (e.g.,
"they are unmaintained and known to be broken" would be a good reason) could we
please include *all* the schema files in the rt package?
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rt-4.2.12
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 8 months
[Bug 1260609] New: bucardo-4.5.0-11.fc24 FTBFS randomly: Bucardo did not start, but we waited!
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260609
Bug ID: 1260609
Summary: bucardo-4.5.0-11.fc24 FTBFS randomly: Bucardo did not
start, but we waited!
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: bucardo
Assignee: itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: bazanluis20(a)gmail.com, itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
puiterwijk(a)redhat.com
bucardo-4.5.0-11.fc24 fails to build in F24 sometimes:
+ make test
cp bucardo_ctl blib/script/bucardo_ctl
"/usr/bin/perl" -MExtUtils::MY -e 'MY->fixin(shift)' -- blib/script/bucardo_ctl
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 "/usr/bin/perl" "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-MTest::Harness"
"-e" "undef *Test::Harness::Switches; test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')"
t/*.t
t/00-release.t ........... skipped: Test skipped unless environment variable
RELEASE_TESTING is set
t/01-basic.t ............. ok
Bucardo did not start, but we waited!
# Looks like you planned 14 tests but ran 9.
t/09-uniqueconstraint.t ..
Dubious, test returned 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00)
Failed 5/14 subtests
t/98-cleanup.t ........... ok
t/99-signature.t ......... skipped: Test skipped unless environment variable
RELEASE_TESTING is set
Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/09-uniqueconstraint.t (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 9 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 255
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 14 tests but ran 9.
Files=5, Tests=15, 60 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 5.72 cusr 1.46
csys = 7.23 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Failed 1/5 test programs. 0/15 subtests failed.
This looks like a race condition in the tests.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 8 months
[Bug 1242802] New: perl-smartmatch-engine-core-0.02-11.fc23 FTBFS: t/core.t test fails
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242802
Bug ID: 1242802
Summary: perl-smartmatch-engine-core-0.02-11.fc23 FTBFS:
t/core.t test fails
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-smartmatch-engine-core
Assignee: ppisar(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: mmaslano(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com
perl-smartmatch-engine-core-0.02-11.fc23 fails to build in F23 because a test
fails:
t/00-compile.t ............ ok
Smartmatch is experimental at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/smartmatch.pm line
71.
Smartmatch is experimental at (eval 8) line 1, <DATA> line 2.
[...]
Smartmatch is experimental at (eval 75) line 1, <DATA> line 76.
t/core.t ..................
Failed 284/351 subtests
Difference between working and failing build root is:
perl 4:5.22.0-346.fc23 > 4:5.22.0-347.fc23
perl-libs 4:5.22.0-346.fc23 > 4:5.22.0-347.fc23
perl-macros 4:5.22.0-346.fc23 > 4:5.22.0-347.fc23
perl-Unicode-Normalize > 1.19-1.fc23
perl-Math-BigInt > 1.9997-347.fc23
perl-devel 4:5.22.0-346.fc23 > 4:5.22.0-347.fc23
perl-MIME-Base64 > 3.15-348.fc23
perl-Term-Cap > 1.16-1.fc23
basesystem 10.0-11.fc23 > 11-1.fc23
perl-Pod-Escapes 1:1.07-346.fc23 > 1:1.07-348.fc23
systemtap-sdt-devel 2.9-0.20150707git... > 2.9-0.20150713git...
python3-six 1.9.0-2.fc23 > 1.9.0-3.fc23
libseccomp 2.2.1-1.fc23 > 2.2.3-0.fc23
libidn 1.30-4.fc23 > 1.31-1.fc23
python 2.7.10-4.fc23 <
python-setuptools 18.0.1-2.fc23 <
gnutls 3.4.2-3.fc23 > 3.4.3-1.fc23
kernel-headers 4.2.0-0.rc1.git1.1.... > 4.2.0-0.rc2.git0.1....
python3-pyparsing > 2.0.3-2.fc23
dwz 0.11-6.fc23 > 0.12-1.fc23
redhat-rpm-config 33-2.fc23 > 34-1.fc23
openssl-libs 1:1.0.2c-3.fc23 > 1:1.0.2d-1.fc23
xz-libs 5.2.1-2.fc23 > 5.2.1-3.fc23
pyparsing 2.0.3-2.fc23 <
python-libs 2.7.10-4.fc23 <
gdb 7.9.50.20150531-5.fc23 > 7.9.90.20150709-6.fc23
xz 5.2.1-2.fc23 > 5.2.1-3.fc23
python-pip 7.1.0-1.fc23 <
gzip 1.6-8.fc23 > 1.6-9.fc23
perl-4:5.22.0-347.fc23 started to propagate Fedora's compiler and linker flags
properly, so this failure could be caused an incompatible flags applied by this
package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 8 months