perl-devel April 2016

perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

10 participants
2243 discussions

[Bug 1243867] New: perl-Panotools-Script-0.28-5.fc24 FTBFS: undeclared dependency on Math::Trig
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Nov '16

24 Nov '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243867 Bug ID: 1243867 Summary: perl-Panotools-Script-0.28-5.fc24 FTBFS: undeclared dependency on Math::Trig Product: Fedora Version: 23 Component: perl-Panotools-Script Assignee: bruno(a)postle.net Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: bruno(a)postle.net, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org perl-Panotools-Script-0.28-5.fc24 fails to build in F23 and F24: + make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 "/usr/bin/perl" "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-MTest::Harness" "-e" "undef *Test::Harness::Switches; test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t # Failed test 'use Panotools::Script::Line::Control;' # at t/001.parse-control.t line 9. # Tried to use 'Panotools::Script::Line::Control'. # Error: Can't locate Math/Trig.pm in @INC (you may need to install the Math::Trig module) (@INC contains: lib /builddir/build/BUILD/Panotools-Script-0.28/blib/lib /builddir/build/BUILD/Panotools-Script-0.28/blib/arch /usr/local/lib64/perl5 /usr/local/share/perl5 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib64/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 .) at lib/Panotools/Script/Line/Control.pm line 5. # BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at lib/Panotools/Script/Line/Control.pm line 5. # Compilation failed in require at t/001.parse-control.t line 9. # BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/001.parse-control.t line 9. Can't locate object method "new" via package "Panotools::Script::Line::Control" at t/001.parse-control.t line 11. # Looks like you failed 1 test of 1. # Looks like your test exited with 255 just after 1. You use Math::Trig Perl module but does not declare dependency on it. The module was unbundled from perl package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1234738] New: perl-Mail-GnuPG-0.21-5.fc23 FTBFS: gpg-agent[31178]: command 'GET_PASSPHRASE' failed: No such file or directory <Pinentry>
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Nov '16

24 Nov '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234738 Bug ID: 1234738 Summary: perl-Mail-GnuPG-0.21-5.fc23 FTBFS: gpg-agent[31178]: command 'GET_PASSPHRASE' failed: No such file or directory <Pinentry> Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Mail-GnuPG Assignee: rc040203(a)freenet.de Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lxtnow(a)gmail.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, rc040203(a)freenet.de perl-Mail-GnuPG-0.21-5.fc23 fails to build in F23 because tests fail: t/99.pod.t ............... ok gpg-agent[31177]: directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/Mail-GnuPG-0.21/mgtZOWG1/.gnupg/private-keys-v1.d' created gpg-agent[31178]: gpg-agent (GnuPG) 2.1.5 started # GPG_AGENT_INFO: /builddir/build/BUILD/Mail-GnuPG-0.21/mgtZOWG1/.gnupg/S.gpg-agent:31178:1 gpg-agent[31178]: command 'GET_PASSPHRASE' failed: No such file or directory <Pinentry> # Failed test 'signing' # at t/agent.t line 101. # got: '2' # expected: '0' # gpg: problem with the agent - disabling agent use # gpg: can't query passphrase in batch mode # gpg: Invalid passphrase; please try again ... # gpg: can't query passphrase in batch mode # gpg: Invalid passphrase; please try again ... # gpg: can't query passphrase in batch mode # gpg: no default secret key: bad passphrase # gpg: signing failed: bad passphrase # Failed test at t/agent.t line 104. # got: '2' # expected: '0' # Failed test at t/agent.t line 105. # got: undef # expected: 'EFEA4EAD' # Failed test at t/agent.t line 106. # got: undef # expected: 'Mail::GnuPG Test Key <mail(a)gnupg.dom>' gpg-agent[31178]: command 'GET_PASSPHRASE' failed: No such file or directory <Pinentry> # Failed test at t/agent.t line 115. # got: '2' # expected: '0' Unknown Content-Type or no PGP message in body at /builddir/build/BUILD/Mail-GnuPG-0.21/blib/lib/Mail/GnuPG.pm line 404. # Looks like you planned 20 tests but ran 8. # Looks like you failed 5 tests of 8 run. # Looks like your test exited with 32 just after 8. gpg-agent[31178]: can't connect my own socket: IPC connect call failed gpg-agent[31178]: this process is useless - shutting down t/agent.t ................ Dubious, test returned 32 (wstat 8192, 0x2000) Failed 17/20 subtests Difference between working and failing build root: gnupg2 2.1.4-2.fc23 > 2.1.5-1.fc23 tzdata 2015d-1.fc23 > 2015d-3.fc23 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1216928] New: Wrong license declaration
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Nov '16

24 Nov '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216928 Bug ID: 1216928 Summary: Wrong license declaration Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Net-DNS-SEC Assignee: wjhns174(a)hardakers.net Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pwouters(a)redhat.com, wjhns174(a)hardakers.net perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23 declares the license as "GPL+ or Artistic". However, there are many files covered by MIT license. For example SEC.pm: =head1 LICENSE Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above copyright notice appear in all copies and that both that copyright notice and this permission notice appear in supporting documentation, and that the name of the author not be used in advertising or publicity pertaining to distribution of the software without specific prior written permission. THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1213823] New: perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires nonexistent dependencies
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Nov '16

24 Nov '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213823 Bug ID: 1213823 Summary: perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires nonexistent dependencies Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Net-DNS-SEC Assignee: wjhns174(a)hardakers.net Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pwouters(a)redhat.com, wjhns174(a)hardakers.net # dnf --enablerepo=f23-build install --best perl-Net-DNS-SEC Using metadata from Tue Apr 21 09:46:27 2015 (3:32:54 hours old) Error: nothing provides perl(Digest::GOST::CryptoPro) needed by perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch buildsys(a)fedoraproject.org robot reports: perl-Net-DNS-SEC has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(Digest::GOST::CryptoPro) perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(Digest::GOST) >= 0:0.06 perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::ECDSA) >= 0:0.06 perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::ECDSA) >= 0:0.05 perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::EC) >= 0:1.01 perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::EC) >= 0:0.5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 12

[Bug 1139141] New: perl-Dumbbench-BoxPlot does not support ARM
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Nov '16

24 Nov '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1139141 Bug ID: 1139141 Summary: perl-Dumbbench-BoxPlot does not support ARM Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-SOOT Assignee: ppisar(a)redhat.com Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com Depends On: 994894 Blocks: 485251 (F-ExcludeArch-ARM) +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #994894 +++ perl-Soot requires root which does not support ARM (bug #991031). perl-Soot will be disabled on ARM. --- Additional comment from Petr Pisar on 2013-08-08 08:54:26 GMT --- ARM support disabled in perl-SOOT-0.17-3.fc20. --- perl-Dumbbench-BoxPlot run-requires perl-SOOT which is not available on ARM. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485251 [Bug 485251] ExcludeArch Tracker for ARM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994894 [Bug 994894] perl-Soot does not support ARM -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ShoZg0yQnv&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 7

[Bug 994894] New: perl-Soot does not support ARM
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Nov '16

24 Nov '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994894 Bug ID: 994894 Summary: perl-Soot does not support ARM Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-SOOT Assignee: ppisar(a)redhat.com Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com Depends On: 991031 Blocks: 485251 (F-ExcludeArch-ARM) perl-Soot requires root which does not support ARM (bug #991031). perl-Soot will be disabled on ARM. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CKPzevCLAa&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 9

[Bug 1274105] New: biber-v2.2 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Nov '16

21 Nov '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274105 Bug ID: 1274105 Summary: biber-v2.2 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: biber Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: cbm(a)m.fsf.org Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: cbm(a)m.fsf.org, mefoster(a)gmail.com, novyjindrich(a)gmail.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: v2.2 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.8-12.fc23 URL: http://biblatex-biber.sourceforge.net/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 25

perl-CryptX package
by Denis Fateyev 16 Nov '16

16 Nov '16

Hello there, I'm going to package CryptX Perl module [1] soon. The only concern is that it contains a lot of XS-based code of ciphers and hashes that can be probably considered as bundled. Mostly the used routines, including sha1, sha2 and md5 implementations, are based on LibTomCrypt library [2, 3]. Neither this library components nor all algo related are mentioned in Bundled library policies [4]. So the question is: should we threat this very case as bundled libs presence? Are there any objections against this module to be packaged "as is", in its current state? Thanks, [1] https://metacpan.org/pod/CryptX [2] http://www.libtom.net [3] https://github.com/libtom/libtomcrypt [4] https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries&… -- wbr, Denis.

3 6

[Bug 808197] New: FTBFS: big endian bug in self checks
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Nov '16

09 Nov '16

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS: big endian bug in self checks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808197 Summary: FTBFS: big endian bug in self checks Product: Fedora Version: 17 Platform: powerpc OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: medium Component: perl-Socket-Netlink AssignedTo: bochecha(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: karsten(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com, bochecha(a)fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Description of problem: perl-Socket-Netlink fails to build on PPC as two of the self checks fail, one of them looks like a big endian bug as the result has a swapped bit: t/12netlink-message-header.t ..... ok # Failed test '$message->attrs after unpack' # at t/13netlink-message-attrs.t line 98. # Structures begin differing at: # $got->{str} = '' # $expected->{str} = 'FGH' # Looks like you failed 1 test of 14. t/13netlink-message-attrs.t ...... Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) Failed 1/14 subtests t/14netlink-message-error.t ...... ok # Failed test '$message->pack' # at t/20io-socket-netlink-generic.t line 55. # at bytes 0-0xf (0-15) # got: | 00 00 00 14 00 1e 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................| # exp: | 00 00 00 14 00 00 00 1e 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................| # Looks like you failed 1 test of 13. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-Socket-Netlink-0.03-4.fc17 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. ppc-koji build --scratch f17 perl-Socket-Netlink-0.03-4.fc17.src.rpm 2. 3. Actual results: http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=469988 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 671445] New: [PATCH] specfile accords to new packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Nov '16

03 Nov '16

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [PATCH] specfile accords to new packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671445 Summary: [PATCH] specfile accords to new packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: cpanspec AssignedTo: steve(a)silug.org ReportedBy: mmaslano(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: steve(a)silug.org, fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Created attachment 474630 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=474630 add epel option This patch should remove things, which are not needed according to new packaging guidelines and latest rpm eg. defining buildroot. The old behaviour is available under --epel option. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

← Newer
1
...
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
...
225
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

perl-devel April 2016