perl-devel August 2016

perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

6 participants
1613 discussions

[Bug 1335443] New: Net::SSLeay produces a warning on EOF
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Nov '17

22 Nov '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335443 Bug ID: 1335443 Summary: Net::SSLeay produces a warning on EOF Product: Fedora Version: 22 Component: perl-Net-SSLeay Severity: low Assignee: paul(a)city-fan.org Reporter: lav(a)yars.free.net QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: jose.p.oliveira.oss(a)gmail.com, kasal(a)ucw.cz, paul(a)city-fan.org, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Created attachment 1156525 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1156525&action=edit proposed fix Description of problem: I repeatedly get this warning from Net::SSLeay: Use of uninitialized value $got in string eq at blib/lib/Net/SSLeay.pm (autosplit into blib/lib/auto/Net/SSLeay/ssl_read_all.al) line 549. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-Net-SSLeay-1.68-1.fc22.x86_64 Expected results: no warnings Additional info: a patch is attached. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 4

[Bug 1336403] New: perl-Email-Abstract-3.008-4.fc25 FTBS: t/abstractions.t test fails: Failed test 'correct stringification of Mail::Internet; same as reference object'
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Nov '17

20 Nov '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336403 Bug ID: 1336403 Summary: perl-Email-Abstract-3.008-4.fc25 FTBS: t/abstractions.t test fails: Failed test 'correct stringification of Mail::Internet; same as reference object' Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Email-Abstract Assignee: tcallawa(a)redhat.com Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, tcallawa(a)redhat.com perl-Email-Abstract-3.008-4.fc25 fails to build in F25 because tests fail: /00-report-prereqs.t .. ok # testing Email::MIME with 1.937 # testing Email::Simple with 2.210 # testing MIME::Entity with 5.507 # testing Mail::Internet with 2.17 # Failed test 'correct stringification of Mail::Internet; same as reference object' # at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 74. # got: '' # expected: 'Joanna, All # # Thanks. I got the following response from Fred Tydeman. # # On Nov 13, 9:56am in "Re: Defect in XBD lr", Joanna Farley wrote: # > Sun's expert in this area after some discussions with a colleague # > outside of Sun concluded that for lround, to align with both C99 and SUS # > changes of the following form were necessary: # > this line of text is really long and no one need worry about it but why was such a long text chosen to begin with i mean really?? # # ----- # Andrew Josey The Open Group # Austin Group Chair Apex Plaza,Forbury Road, # Email: a.josey(a)opengroup.org Reading,Berks.RG1 1AX,England # Tel: +44 118 9508311 ext 2250 Fax: +44 118 9500110' # Failed test 'correct body length for Mail::Internet' # at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 80. # got: '0' # expected: '749' # Failed test 'correct stringification of Mail::Internet; same as reference object' # at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 74. # got: '' # expected: 'Joanna, All # # Thanks. I got the following response from Fred Tydeman. # # On Nov 13, 9:56am in "Re: Defect in XBD lr", Joanna Farley wrote: # > Sun's expert in this area after some discussions with a colleague # > outside of Sun concluded that for lround, to align with both C99 and SUS # > changes of the following form were necessary: # > this line of text is really long and no one need worry about it but why was such a long text chosen to begin with i mean really?? # # ----- # Andrew Josey The Open Group # Austin Group Chair Apex Plaza,Forbury Road, # Email: a.josey(a)opengroup.org Reading,Berks.RG1 1AX,England # Tel: +44 118 9508311 ext 2250 Fax: +44 118 9500110' # Failed test 'correct body length for Mail::Internet' # at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 80. # got: '0' # expected: '749' # Failed test 'correct stringification of Mail::Internet; same as reference object' # at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 74. # got: '' # expected: 'Joanna, All # # Thanks. I got the following response from Fred Tydeman. # # On Nov 13, 9:56am in "Re: Defect in XBD lr", Joanna Farley wrote: # > Sun's expert in this area after some discussions with a colleague # > outside of Sun concluded that for lround, to align with both C99 and SUS # > changes of the following form were necessary: # > this line of text is really long and no one need worry about it but why was such a long text chosen to begin with i mean really?? # # ----- # Andrew Josey The Open Group # Austin Group Chair Apex Plaza,Forbury Road, # Email: a.josey(a)opengroup.org Reading,Berks.RG1 1AX,England # Tel: +44 118 9508311 ext 2250 Fax: +44 118 9500110' # Failed test 'correct body length for Mail::Internet' # at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 80. # got: '0' # expected: '749' # testing Mail::Message with 2.118 # testing MIME::Entity with 5.507 # testing Email::MIME with 1.937 # Looks like you failed 6 tests of 165. t/abstractions.t ....... Dubious, test returned 6 (wstat 1536, 0x600) Failed 6/165 subtests This is caused by upgrading perl-MailTools from 2.16-1.fc25 to 2.17-1.fc25. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 3

[Bug 1242769] New: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit-1.05-14.fc23 FTBFS: Failed test at t/02bad_deriv.t line 50
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Sep '17

04 Sep '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242769 Bug ID: 1242769 Summary: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit-1.05-14.fc23 FTBFS: Failed test at t/02bad_deriv.t line 50 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org perl-Algorithm-CurveFit-1.05-14.fc23 fails to build in F23 because tests fail: t/01basic.t ...... ok # Failed test at t/02bad_deriv.t line 50. # Looks like you failed 1 test of 13. t/02bad_deriv.t .. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) Failed 1/13 subtests Verbose test output: $ prove -b -v t/02bad_deriv.t t/02bad_deriv.t .. 1..13 ok 1 ok 2 not ok 3 # Failed test at t/02bad_deriv.t line 50. ok 4 ok 5 ok 6 ok 7 ok 8 ok 9 ok 10 ok 11 ok 12 ok 13 # Looks like you failed 1 test of 13. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) Failed 1/13 subtests -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 14

[Bug 1326387] New: EPEL7 branch request for perl-Data-HexDump
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Aug '17

10 Aug '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326387 Bug ID: 1326387 Summary: EPEL7 branch request for perl-Data-HexDump Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Data-HexDump Assignee: andreas(a)bawue.net Reporter: esandeen(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: andreas(a)bawue.net, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Hi, I'd like to look into packaging ncid for EPEL7; there is one tool in the package which requires perl-Data-HexDump. If you'd be willing to create an EPEL7 branch for perl-Data-HexDump, that would be great. If not, I'd be happy to own that branch, or simply remove the one tool from the ncid package which requires it. Thanks, -Eric -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 2

[Bug 1288914] New: RT package is missing database schemas
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Aug '17

08 Aug '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288914 Bug ID: 1288914 Summary: RT package is missing database schemas Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: rt Assignee: rc040203(a)freenet.de Reporter: lars(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, rc040203(a)freenet.de, tibbs(a)math.uh.edu Description of problem: I was trying to install RT on Fedora using a Postgres database, only to discover that the package only includes the MySQL schema files and explicitly excludes the schema files for Postgres, Oracle, and SQLite. Unless there is a good reason to exclude some or all of the schema files (e.g., "they are unmaintained and known to be broken" would be a good reason) could we please include *all* the schema files in the rt package? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): rt-4.2.12 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 3

[Bug 1260609] New: bucardo-4.5.0-11.fc24 FTBFS randomly: Bucardo did not start, but we waited!
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Aug '17

08 Aug '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260609 Bug ID: 1260609 Summary: bucardo-4.5.0-11.fc24 FTBFS randomly: Bucardo did not start, but we waited! Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: bucardo Assignee: itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: bazanluis20(a)gmail.com, itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, puiterwijk(a)redhat.com bucardo-4.5.0-11.fc24 fails to build in F24 sometimes: + make test cp bucardo_ctl blib/script/bucardo_ctl "/usr/bin/perl" -MExtUtils::MY -e 'MY->fixin(shift)' -- blib/script/bucardo_ctl PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 "/usr/bin/perl" "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-MTest::Harness" "-e" "undef *Test::Harness::Switches; test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/00-release.t ........... skipped: Test skipped unless environment variable RELEASE_TESTING is set t/01-basic.t ............. ok Bucardo did not start, but we waited! # Looks like you planned 14 tests but ran 9. t/09-uniqueconstraint.t .. Dubious, test returned 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00) Failed 5/14 subtests t/98-cleanup.t ........... ok t/99-signature.t ......... skipped: Test skipped unless environment variable RELEASE_TESTING is set Test Summary Report ------------------- t/09-uniqueconstraint.t (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 9 Failed: 0) Non-zero exit status: 255 Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 14 tests but ran 9. Files=5, Tests=15, 60 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 5.72 cusr 1.46 csys = 7.23 CPU) Result: FAIL Failed 1/5 test programs. 0/15 subtests failed. This looks like a race condition in the tests. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 3

[Bug 992723] New: perl-Sys-SigAction: FTBFS in rawhide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Aug '17

08 Aug '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992723 Bug ID: 992723 Summary: perl-Sys-SigAction: FTBFS in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Sys-SigAction Assignee: andreas(a)bawue.net Reporter: dennis(a)ausil.us QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: andreas(a)bawue.net, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 991858 Your package perl-Sys-SigAction failed to build from source in current rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5742271 Build logs: root.log: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/2271/5742271/root.log build.log: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/2271/5742271/build.log state.log: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/2271/5742271/state.log NOTE: build logs are cleaned up after 1 week For details on mass rebuild see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass_Rebuild -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2WcWPScqyu&a=cc_unsubscribe

2 8

[Bug 1242802] New: perl-smartmatch-engine-core-0.02-11.fc23 FTBFS: t/core.t test fails
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Aug '17

07 Aug '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242802 Bug ID: 1242802 Summary: perl-smartmatch-engine-core-0.02-11.fc23 FTBFS: t/core.t test fails Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-smartmatch-engine-core Assignee: ppisar(a)redhat.com Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: mmaslano(a)redhat.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com perl-smartmatch-engine-core-0.02-11.fc23 fails to build in F23 because a test fails: t/00-compile.t ............ ok Smartmatch is experimental at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/smartmatch.pm line 71. Smartmatch is experimental at (eval 8) line 1, <DATA> line 2. [...] Smartmatch is experimental at (eval 75) line 1, <DATA> line 76. t/core.t .................. Failed 284/351 subtests Difference between working and failing build root is: perl 4:5.22.0-346.fc23 > 4:5.22.0-347.fc23 perl-libs 4:5.22.0-346.fc23 > 4:5.22.0-347.fc23 perl-macros 4:5.22.0-346.fc23 > 4:5.22.0-347.fc23 perl-Unicode-Normalize > 1.19-1.fc23 perl-Math-BigInt > 1.9997-347.fc23 perl-devel 4:5.22.0-346.fc23 > 4:5.22.0-347.fc23 perl-MIME-Base64 > 3.15-348.fc23 perl-Term-Cap > 1.16-1.fc23 basesystem 10.0-11.fc23 > 11-1.fc23 perl-Pod-Escapes 1:1.07-346.fc23 > 1:1.07-348.fc23 systemtap-sdt-devel 2.9-0.20150707git... > 2.9-0.20150713git... python3-six 1.9.0-2.fc23 > 1.9.0-3.fc23 libseccomp 2.2.1-1.fc23 > 2.2.3-0.fc23 libidn 1.30-4.fc23 > 1.31-1.fc23 python 2.7.10-4.fc23 < python-setuptools 18.0.1-2.fc23 < gnutls 3.4.2-3.fc23 > 3.4.3-1.fc23 kernel-headers 4.2.0-0.rc1.git1.1.... > 4.2.0-0.rc2.git0.1.... python3-pyparsing > 2.0.3-2.fc23 dwz 0.11-6.fc23 > 0.12-1.fc23 redhat-rpm-config 33-2.fc23 > 34-1.fc23 openssl-libs 1:1.0.2c-3.fc23 > 1:1.0.2d-1.fc23 xz-libs 5.2.1-2.fc23 > 5.2.1-3.fc23 pyparsing 2.0.3-2.fc23 < python-libs 2.7.10-4.fc23 < gdb 7.9.50.20150531-5.fc23 > 7.9.90.20150709-6.fc23 xz 5.2.1-2.fc23 > 5.2.1-3.fc23 python-pip 7.1.0-1.fc23 < gzip 1.6-8.fc23 > 1.6-9.fc23 perl-4:5.22.0-347.fc23 started to propagate Fedora's compiler and linker flags properly, so this failure could be caused an incompatible flags applied by this package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 6

[Bug 1238804] New: /usr/bin/perl is not linked with -z now
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Aug '17

07 Aug '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238804 Bug ID: 1238804 Summary: /usr/bin/perl is not linked with -z now Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu, iarnell(a)gmail.com, jplesnik(a)redhat.com, kasal(a)ucw.cz, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com, psabata(a)redhat.com, rc040203(a)freenet.de, tcallawa(a)redhat.com /usr/bin/perl is not linked with -z now. The -z now is defined by -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld: gcc -o libperl.so -shared -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -m64 -mtune=generic -Wl,-z,relro -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -L/usr/local/lib -Wl,-soname -Wl,libperl.so.5.22 op.o perl.o gv.o toke.o perly.o pad.o regcomp.o dump.o util.o mg.o reentr.o mro_core.o keywords.o hv.o av.o run.o pp_hot.o sv.o pp.o scope.o pp_ctl.o pp_sys.o doop.o doio.o regexec.o utf8.o taint.o deb.o universal.o globals.o perlio.o perlapi.o numeric.o mathoms.o locale.o pp_pack.o pp_sort.o caretx.o perldtrace.o DynaLoader.o -lpthread -lresolv -lnsl -ldl -lm -lcrypt -lutil -lc Processing extracted/DCombiningClass.txt Processing extracted/DNumType.txt gcc -o perl -fstack-protector-strong -L/usr/local/lib -Wl,--enable-new-dtags perlmain.o libperl.so `cat ext.libs` -lpthread -lresolv -lnsl -ldl -lm -lcrypt -lutil -lc The reason is we configure perl as: /bin/sh Configure -des -Doptimize="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" \ -Dccdlflags="-Wl,--enable-new-dtags" \ -Dlddlflags="-shared $RPM_OPT_FLAGS $RPM_LD_FLAGS" \ The $RPM_LD_FLAGS should go into ccdlflags too. ccdlflags is for linking programs dynamycally, lddlflags if for linking libraries dynamically. Configure supports ldflags, but I worry this is has to be actively used by Makefile.PLs, so it is not much helpful. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 25

[Bug 1354386] New: CVE-2016-6185 perl: XSLoader loads relative paths not included in @INC
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Aug '17

04 Aug '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354386 Bug ID: 1354386 Summary: CVE-2016-6185 perl: XSLoader loads relative paths not included in @INC Product: Security Response Component: vulnerability Keywords: Security Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: security-response-team(a)redhat.com Reporter: amaris(a)redhat.com CC: cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu, hhorak(a)redhat.com, iarnell(a)gmail.com, jorton(a)redhat.com, jplesnik(a)redhat.com, kasal(a)ucw.cz, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, perl-maint-list(a)redhat.com, ppisar(a)redhat.com, psabata(a)redhat.com, rc040203(a)freenet.de, rmeggins(a)redhat.com, tcallawa(a)redhat.com An arbitrary code execution can be achieved if loading code from untrusted current working directory despite the '.' is removed from @INC. Vulnerability is in XSLoader that uses caller() information to locate .so file to load. If malicious attacker creates directory named `(eval 1)` with malicious binary file in it, it will be loaded if the package calling XSLoader is in parent directory. CVE assignment: http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q3/28 Upstream bug: https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=115808 Upstream patch: http://perl5.git.perl.org/perl.git/commitdiff/08e3451d7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

2 23

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
162
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

perl-devel August 2016