[Bug 1331825] New: perl-Net-Server should depend on
perl-IO-Socket-INET6
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331825
Bug ID: 1331825
Summary: perl-Net-Server should depend on perl-IO-Socket-INET6
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel7
Component: perl-Net-Server
Assignee: lkundrak(a)v3.sk
Reporter: roy(a)karlsbakk.net
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: kevin(a)scrye.com, lkundrak(a)v3.sk,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Description of problem:
With systems like munin-node, it's unable to listen to IPv6 unless
perl-IO-Socket-INET6 is installed manually. There really isn't a good reason to
keep this out, since IPv6 is getting rather common these days
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Current RHEL/CentOS 7 as of 2016-04-29
How reproducible:
Every time
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Try to bind to IPv6 with perl-Net-Server
2.
3.
Actual results:
Fails
Expected results:
Succeeds
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 10 months
[Bug 1268828] New: RFE: On 32 bit platforms, enable -Duse64bitint and maybe also -Duselongdouble
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268828
Bug ID: 1268828
Summary: RFE: On 32 bit platforms, enable -Duse64bitint and
maybe also -Duselongdouble
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: rjones(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu, iarnell(a)gmail.com,
jplesnik(a)redhat.com, kasal(a)ucw.cz,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com,
psabata(a)redhat.com, rc040203(a)freenet.de,
tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Perl on Fedora 32 bit platforms uses 32 bit ints, and on 64 bit
platforms uses 64 bit ints.
This causes some problems when we express size-in-bytes in some
programs -- it is easy for these kind of programs to work fine on
the common 64 bit platform, but to fail to work in bad ways (rounding
errors or overflows) on 32 bit. Since 32 bit is comparatively rare,
these bugs can go unnoticed. An example of a program that will fail
like this is: http://git.annexia.org/?p=import-to-ovirt.git;a=tree
Also, Debian (since Wheezy) has enabled this option, so by making
this change we would be consistent with Debian & Ubuntu.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=310995
Some pros and cons described here:
http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters/2010/04/msg158984.html
There is also interaction with another option (-Duselongdouble).
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-5.22.0-350.fc24
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 10 months
[Bug 1309675] New: perl-DBD-SQLite-1.50-1.fc24 FTBFS: t/43_fts3.t
test fails
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309675
Bug ID: 1309675
Summary: perl-DBD-SQLite-1.50-1.fc24 FTBFS: t/43_fts3.t test
fails
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-DBD-SQLite
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com, mmaslano(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com,
steve(a)silug.org
perl-DBD-SQLite-1.50-1.fc24 fails to build in F24 because of rebased sqlite
that disabled ENABLE_FTS3_TOKENIZER:
t/42_primary_key_info.t ............................... ok
DBD::SQLite::db do failed: unknown tokenizer: perl at t/43_fts3.t line 87.
# Failed test 'no warnings'
# at inc/Test/NoWarnings.pm line 38.
# There were 1 warning(s)
# Previous test 1 'An object of class 'DBI::db' isa 'DBI::db''
# DBD::SQLite::db do failed: unknown tokenizer: perl at t/43_fts3.t line
87.
# at t/43_fts3.t line 87.
#
# Looks like you planned 35 tests but ran 2.
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 2 run.
# Looks like your test exited with 255 just after 2.
t/43_fts3.t ...........................................
Dubious, test returned 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00)
Failed 34/35 subtests
Difference between working and failing build root:
sqlite-devel 3.10.2-3.fc24 > 3.11.0-1.fc24
glibc 2.22.90-35.fc24 > 2.22.90-36.fc24
sqlite 3.10.2-3.fc24 > 3.11.0-1.fc24
sqlite-libs 3.10.2-3.fc24 > 3.11.0-1.fc24
glibc-common 2.22.90-35.fc24 > 2.22.90-36.fc24
krb5-libs 1.14-20.fc24 > 1.14-21.fc24
glibc-devel 2.22.90-35.fc24 > 2.22.90-36.fc24
systemd-libs 229-1.fc24 > 229-2.fc24
gdb 7.10.90.20160211-52.fc24 > 7.10.90.20160216-54.fc24
libicu 56.1-1.fc24 > 56.1-3.fc24
kernel-headers 4.5.0-0.rc3.git3.1.... > 4.5.0-0.rc4.git0.1....
binutils 2.26-10.fc24 > 2.26-11.fc24
glibc-headers 2.22.90-35.fc24 > 2.22.90-36.fc24
lzo 2.08-6.fc24 > 2.08-7.fc24
systemd 229-1.fc24 > 229-2.fc24
gnupg2 2.1.10-4.fc24 > 2.1.11-1.fc24
python3-pyparsing 2.1.0-1.fc24 > 2.1.0-2.fc24
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 11 months
[Bug 1417721] New: [RFE] EPEL7 branch for perl-XML-Bare
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1417721
Bug ID: 1417721
Summary: [RFE] EPEL7 branch for perl-XML-Bare
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-XML-Bare
Assignee: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr
Reporter: riehecky(a)fnal.gov
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr, i(a)cicku.me,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Description of problem:
Can perl-XML-Bare be branched for EPEL7?
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 11 months
[Bug 1437790] New: perl-Makefile-DOM-0.008-6.fc27 FTBFS:
tests fail with perl-List-MoreUtils-0.418-1.fc27
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437790
Bug ID: 1437790
Summary: perl-Makefile-DOM-0.008-6.fc27 FTBFS: tests fail with
perl-List-MoreUtils-0.418-1.fc27
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Makefile-DOM
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
vanmeeuwen+fedora(a)kolabsys.com
perl-Makefile-DOM-0.008-6.fc27 fails to build in F27 because some tests fail:
t/mdom/gmake/comment.t .............. ok
Use of uninitialized value in string eq at
/builddir/build/BUILD/Makefile-DOM-0.008/blib/lib/MDOM/Document/Gmake.pm line
474, <$in> line 1.
[...]
Use of uninitialized value in string eq at
/builddir/build/BUILD/Makefile-DOM-0.008/blib/lib/MDOM/Document/Gmake.pm line
474, <$in> line 5.
# Failed test 'TEST 1: multi-line var assignment (the 'define' directive) -
DOM structure ok'
# at t/GmakeDOM.pm line 36.
# @@ -1,13 +1,11 @@
# MDOM::Document::Gmake
# - MDOM::Directive
# - MDOM::Token::Bare 'define'
# - MDOM::Token::Whitespace ' '
# - MDOM::Token::Bare 'remote-file'
# + MDOM::Unknown
# + MDOM::Token::Bare 'define remote-file'
# MDOM::Token::Whitespace '\n'
# MDOM::Unknown
# MDOM::Token::Bare ' '
# MDOM::Token::Interpolation '$(if $(filter unix, $($1.type)), \\n
/net/$($1.host)/$($1.path), \\n //$($1.host)/$($1.path))'
# MDOM::Token::Whitespace '\n'
# - MDOM::Directive
# + MDOM::Unknown
# MDOM::Token::Bare 'endef'
# MDOM::Token::Whitespace '\n'
t/mdom/gmake/directive-define.t .....
Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 1/2 subtests
[...]
Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/mdom/gmake/directive-define.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 2 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 2
Non-zero exit status: 1
t/mdom/gmake/directive-export.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 2 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 2
Non-zero exit status: 1
t/mdom/gmake/directive-include.t (Wstat: 768 Tests: 10 Failed: 3)
Failed tests: 2, 4, 10
Non-zero exit status: 3
t/mdom/gmake/directive-vpath.t (Wstat: 768 Tests: 6 Failed: 3)
Failed tests: 2, 4, 6
Non-zero exit status: 3
Files=19, Tests=305, 5 wallclock secs ( 0.18 usr 0.05 sys + 4.22 cusr 0.22
csys = 4.67 CPU)
This is caused by upgrading perl-List-MoreUtils from 0.416-2.fc26 to
0.418-1.fc27.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 11 months
[Bug 1425077] New: Deprecated use of Slurp
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1425077
Bug ID: 1425077
Summary: Deprecated use of Slurp
Product: Fedora
Version: 25
Component: bugzilla
Assignee: itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br
Reporter: mike(a)cchtml.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: bazanluis20(a)gmail.com, emmanuel(a)seyman.fr,
itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Description of problem:
Starting with Perl 5.24, perl will echo a deprecation warning when Bugzilla
uses the Slurp library with a utf8 handle.
I received this warning when the daily cron job installed by Bugzilla fires.
/etc/cron.daily/bugzilla.cron:
sysread() is deprecated on :utf8 handles at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/File/Slurp.pm line 225.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
bugzilla-5.0.3-3.fc25.noarch
perl-5.24.1-384.fc25.x86_64
perl-File-Slurp-9999.19-15.fc25.noarch
Additional info:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=826415
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 12 months
[Bug 1403588] New: /usr/share/bugzilla/assets/.htaccess:
Require not allowed here
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403588
Bug ID: 1403588
Summary: /usr/share/bugzilla/assets/.htaccess: Require not
allowed here
Product: Fedora
Version: 25
Component: bugzilla
Assignee: itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br
Reporter: adrian(a)lisas.de
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: bazanluis20(a)gmail.com, emmanuel(a)seyman.fr,
itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Description of problem:
Cannot access js and css files under /usr/share/bugzilla/assets/
Getting following error in the error.log
/usr/share/bugzilla/assets/.htaccess: Require not allowed here
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
bugzilla-5.0.3-3.fc25.noarch
How reproducible:
Always
Package seems to be unmodified. No output from 'rpm -V bugzilla'
buglist.cgi works but no css and js files are loaded.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 12 months