[Bug 1829984] New: perl-HTTP-Response-Encoding for EL8
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829984
Bug ID: 1829984
Summary: perl-HTTP-Response-Encoding for EL8
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: perl-HTTP-Response-Encoding
Assignee: tremble(a)tremble.org.uk
Reporter: xavier(a)bachelot.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ktdreyer(a)ktdreyer.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rc040203(a)freenet.de, tremble(a)tremble.org.uk
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hi,
Could you please build perl-HTTP-Response-Encoding in EPEL 8 ?
It's in the dependency chain of a package I'd like to build for EPEL 8.
Master branch rebuilds properly against epel 8 target.
Regards,
Xavier
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 5 months
[Bug 1829980] New: perl-Pod-Tests for EL8
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829980
Bug ID: 1829980
Summary: perl-Pod-Tests for EL8
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Pod-Tests
Assignee: tremble(a)tremble.org.uk
Reporter: xavier(a)bachelot.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: lxtnow(a)gmail.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rc040203(a)freenet.de, tremble(a)tremble.org.uk
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hi,
Could you please build perl-Pod-Tests in EPEL 8 ?
It's in the dependency chain of a package I'd like to build for EPEL 8.
Master branch rebuilds properly against epel 8 target.
Regards,
Xavier
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 5 months
[Bug 1781737] New: Co-maintainer request (to maintain EPEL8 branch)
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781737
Bug ID: 1781737
Summary: Co-maintainer request (to maintain EPEL8 branch)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DBD-ODBC
Assignee: holcapek(a)gmail.com
Reporter: i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: holcapek(a)gmail.com, jakub.jedelsky(a)gmail.com,
lkundrak(a)v3.sk, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
tjczepiel(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hello,
We are working on bringing multiple perl packages into a 'upstream' (EPEL)
which we use internally (at GoodData). This package is one of many which have
builds in Fedora Rawhide but lacks EPEL8 branch. We would like to request it
and help you to maintain the package (incl. Fedora Rawhide).
Please add us to a maintainer list for the package perl-DBD-ODBC. Our FAS
usernames are:
- tjmc
- kubo
Thanks for the cooperation in advance!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 5 months
[Bug 1753543] New: perl-Font-AFM for EL8
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1753543
Bug ID: 1753543
Summary: perl-Font-AFM for EL8
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Font-AFM
Assignee: tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Reporter: xavier(a)bachelot.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: lxtnow(a)gmail.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rc040203(a)freenet.de, rob.myers(a)gtri.gatech.edu,
tcallawa(a)redhat.com, tremble(a)tremble.org.uk
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hi,
Could you please branch and build perl-FontAFM for EPEL 8 ?
It is in the dependency chain of another package I'd like to maintain in EPEL
8.
Regards,
Xavier
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 5 months
[Bug 1749132] New: Too strict gir lib search pattern
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749132
Bug ID: 1749132
Summary: Too strict gir lib search pattern
Product: Fedora
Version: 30
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Glib-Object-Introspection
Assignee: berrange(a)redhat.com
Reporter: iamdexpl(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: berrange(a)redhat.com, ddick(a)cpan.org,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 1611740
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1611740&action=edit
A less-strict template
Description of problem: perli11ndoc script from perl-Glib-Object-Introspection
can either display a window with a drop-down list of available GIRs or, if
launched with a GIR name, find the corresponding file, parse it and dump to
stdout. The latter mode has, among other things, a check whether the given
argument can be a valid GIR name. However the pattern to check against is too
strict. For example, it filters out GdkX11, libxfce4panel, libxfce4ui,
libxfce4util and PangoFT2
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. install and of the following — pango-devel, xfce4-panel, libxfce4ui,
gtk3-devel, libxfce4util
2. run perli11ndoc without arguments; ensure that the GIR matching the
installed package is listed in a drop-down list
3. run perli11ndoc GdkX11 (or whatever name from that packages installed on
step 1)
Actual results: "Cannot recognize the library name" on stderr
Expected results: contents of that GIR on stdout
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 5 months
[Bug 1835451] New: raise ValueError, errmsg # 'File Not Found in
bugzilla-submit
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835451
Bug ID: 1835451
Summary: raise ValueError, errmsg # 'File Not Found in
bugzilla-submit
Product: Fedora
Version: 31
Status: NEW
Component: bugzilla
Severity: high
Assignee: itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br
Reporter: atodorov(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr, itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
/usr/share/bugzilla/contrib/bugzilla-submit/bugzilla-submit
File "/usr/share/bugzilla/contrib/bugzilla-submit/bugzilla-submit", line 38
raise ValueError, errmsg # 'File Not Found'
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
Documentation says I can run this with Python 2.3 or higher and indeed the file
has a python3 shebang. However it is invalid.
That is a Python2 only script which clearly doesn't have any tests executed
against it.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
bugzilla-contrib-5.0.6-3.fc31.noarch
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. dnf install bugzilla-contrib
2. /usr/share/bugzilla/contrib/bugzilla-submit/bugzilla-submit
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 5 months
[Bug 1823526] New: bugzilla fails to build with Sphinx 3.0.0
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823526
Bug ID: 1823526
Summary: bugzilla fails to build with Sphinx 3.0.0
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: bugzilla
Assignee: itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br
Reporter: cstratak(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: cstratak(a)redhat.com, emmanuel(a)seyman.fr,
itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br, mhroncok(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 1783776
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
bugzilla fails to build with Sphinx 3.0.0.
This report is automated and not very verbose, but we'll try to get back here
with details.
For the build logs, see:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/cstratak/sphinx_3.0.0/fed...
For all our attempts to build bugzilla with Sphinx 3.0.0, see:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/cstratak/sphinx_3.0.0/package/bug...
Testing and mass rebuild of packages is happening in copr. You can follow these
instructions to test locally in mock if your package builds with Sphinx 3:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/cstratak/sphinx_3.0.0/
Let us know here if you have any questions.
Sphinx 3 will be included in Fedora 33. To make that update smoother, we're
building the dependent packages in Copr.
We'd appreciate help from the people who know this package best, but if you
don't want to work on this now, let us know so we can try to work around it on
our side.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1783776
[Bug 1783776] python-sphinx-3.0.1 is available
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 6 months
[Bug 1848125] New: amavisd fails to start in multiple port config
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848125
Bug ID: 1848125
Summary: amavisd fails to start in multiple port config
Product: Fedora
Version: 32
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: amavisd-new
Severity: high
Assignee: j.orti.alcaine(a)gmail.com
Reporter: dan(a)islenet.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: janfrode(a)tanso.net, j.orti.alcaine(a)gmail.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, steve(a)silug.org,
vanmeeuwen+fedora(a)kolabsys.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
amavisd fails to start using recommend 2 port configuration:
$inet_socket_port = [10024,10026]; # listen on multiple TCP ports
The failure occurs because the selinux-policy has labelled port 10026 as for
use by spamd.
[root]# semanage port -l | grep spamd
spamd_port_t tcp 783, 10026, 10027
Another port could be used as a workaround but it would be helpful for the
amavisd and selinux team to identify another recommended port for the 2nd
instance which would be properly labeled in the selinux policy.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 7 months