August 2020 - perl-devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 1745564] New: Upgrade perl-XML-RSS to 1.61

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1745564 Bug ID: 1745564 Summary: Upgrade perl-XML-RSS to 1.61 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-XML-RSS Assignee: tcallawa(a)redhat.com Reporter: jplesnik(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, tcallawa(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest Fedora delivers 1.60 version. Upstream released 1.61. When you have free time, please upgrade it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

3 years

1
2
0 / 0

[Bug 1830000] New: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-PSGI for EL7

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830000 Bug ID: 1830000 Summary: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-PSGI for EL7 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-PSGI Assignee: rc040203(a)freenet.de Reporter: xavier(a)bachelot.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, rc040203(a)freenet.de Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hi, Could you please build perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-PSGI in EPEL 7 ? It's in the dependency chain of a package I'd like to build for EPEL 7. Regards, Xavier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

3 years, 1 month

1
5
0 / 0

[Bug 1807857] New: please build perl-Sys-SigAction on EPEL8

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807857 Bug ID: 1807857 Summary: please build perl-Sys-SigAction on EPEL8 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: perl-Sys-SigAction Assignee: tremble(a)tremble.org.uk Reporter: lionel.cons(a)cern.ch QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: andreas(a)bawue.net, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, tremble(a)tremble.org.uk Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Could you please build perl-Sys-SigAction on EPEL8? It would make sense to also upgrade to the latest version (0.23). EPEL7 has 0.20. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

3 years, 1 month

1
15
0 / 0

[Bug 1850772] New: Add perl-Email-Valid to EPEL8 / co-maintainer request

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850772 Bug ID: 1850772 Summary: Add perl-Email-Valid to EPEL8 / co-maintainer request Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: perl-Email-Valid Assignee: spotrh(a)gmail.com Reporter: jakub.jedelsky(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: jakub.jedelsky(a)gmail.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, spotrh(a)gmail.com, tjczepiel(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Please, add perl-Email-Valid to EPEL8. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

3 years, 1 month

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 1822398] New: Request for perl-Net-OpenSSH for EPEL8

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822398 Bug ID: 1822398 Summary: Request for perl-Net-OpenSSH for EPEL8 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: perl-Net-OpenSSH Assignee: steve.traylen(a)cern.ch Reporter: dmaphy(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, steve.traylen(a)cern.ch Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora perl-Net-OpenSSH is not available on EPEL8 so far. It would be great to have it there to be able to build the friendly automation framework Rex for EPEL8 as well. This currently fails: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43134675 The root.log states: ``` DEBUG util.py:600: No matching package to install: 'perl(Net::OpenSSH::ShellQuoter)' ``` -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

3 years, 3 months

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 1781754] New: Co-maintainer request (to maintain EPEL8 branch)

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781754 Bug ID: 1781754 Summary: Co-maintainer request (to maintain EPEL8 branch) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Net-OpenSSH Assignee: steve.traylen(a)cern.ch Reporter: i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: jakub.jedelsky(a)gmail.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, steve.traylen(a)cern.ch, tjczepiel(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hello, We are working on bringing multiple perl packages into a 'upstream' (EPEL) which we use internally (at GoodData). This package is one of many which have builds in Fedora Rawhide but lacks EPEL8 branch. We would like to request it and help you to maintain the package (incl. Fedora Rawhide). Please add us to a maintainer list for the package perl-Net-OpenSSH. Our FAS usernames are: - tjmc - kubo Thanks for the cooperation in advance! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

3 years, 3 months

1
11
0 / 0

[Bug 1821881] New: CVE-2013-7488 perl-Convert-ASN1: allows remote attackers to cause an infinite loop via unexpected input [fedora-all]

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821881 Bug ID: 1821881 Summary: CVE-2013-7488 perl-Convert-ASN1: allows remote attackers to cause an infinite loop via unexpected input [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 31 Status: NEW Component: perl-Convert-ASN1 Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com Reporter: gsuckevi(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, caolanm(a)redhat.com, john.j5live(a)gmail.com, jplesnik(a)redhat.com, kasal(a)ucw.cz, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions of fedora-all. For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field. For more information see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as the relevant top-level CVE bugs. Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the fedpkg commit message. NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora. While only one tracking bug has been filed, please correct all affected versions at the same time. If you need to fix the versions independent of each other, you may clone this bug as appropriate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

3 years, 3 months

1
12
0 / 0

[Bug 1781753] New: Co-maintainer request (to maintain EPEL8 branch)

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781753 Bug ID: 1781753 Summary: Co-maintainer request (to maintain EPEL8 branch) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Net-Amazon-S3 Assignee: ppisar(a)redhat.com Reporter: i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: jakub.jedelsky(a)gmail.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com, rrati(a)redhat.com, tjczepiel(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hello, We are working on bringing multiple perl packages into a 'upstream' (EPEL) which we use internally (at GoodData). This package is one of many which have builds in Fedora Rawhide but lacks EPEL8 branch. We would like to request it and help you to maintain the package (incl. Fedora Rawhide). Please add us to a maintainer list for the package perl-Net-Amazon-S3. Our FAS usernames are: - tjmc - kubo Thanks for the cooperation in advance! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

3 years, 4 months

1
6
0 / 0

[Bug 1744419] New: Replace /etc/rc.d/init.d/httpd by systemctl

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744419 Bug ID: 1744419 Summary: Replace /etc/rc.d/init.d/httpd by systemctl Product: Fedora Version: 30 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: w3c-markup-validator Assignee: nathanael(a)gnat.ca Reporter: jan.kratochvil(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: nathanael(a)gnat.ca, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Scripts are obsolete. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): w3c-markup-validator-1.3-16.fc30.noarch How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. dnf install w3c-markup-validator 2. Access http://localhost/w3c-validator/ Actual results: File not found. Expected results: Validator. Additional info: .spec scripts are calling: /etc/rc.d/init.d/httpd reload They should call: systemctl try-reload-or-restart httpd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

3 years, 4 months

1
13
0 / 0

[Bug 1851872] New: Wrong tag in comment line of DKIM record: 'i=' should be 's='

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851872 Bug ID: 1851872 Summary: Wrong tag in comment line of DKIM record: 'i=' should be 's=' Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: amavisd-new Severity: low Assignee: jortialc(a)redhat.com Reporter: aad(a)offerman.net QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: janfrode(a)tanso.net, jortialc(a)redhat.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, steve(a)silug.org, vanmeeuwen+fedora(a)kolabsys.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The comment line generated with the DKIM record shows an 'i=' (identifier) tag, while this should be the 's=' (selector) tag. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.12.0 How reproducible: set up a DKIM key pair in the configuration and run the command: amavisd -c /etc/amavisd/amavisd.conf showkeys the first line of a/each DKIM record is a command line, now saying something like this: ; key#27 4096 bits, i=dkim20191228, d=example.com, /etc/amavisd/example.com.dkim20191228.pem this should be: ; key#27 4096 bits, s=dkim20191228, d=example.com, /etc/amavisd/example.com.dkim20191228.pem Additional info: Since this is only a comment line providing info on the actual record that follows, there's no harm done, other than suggesting that this is the identifier rather than the selector tag. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

3 years, 4 months

1
7
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

perl-devel August 2020