perl-devel May 2022

perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

5 participants
278 discussions

[Bug 1942850] New: Upgrade perl-File-Touch to 0.12
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 04 May '22

04 May '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942850 Bug ID: 1942850 Summary: Upgrade perl-File-Touch to 0.12 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-File-Touch Assignee: andrea.veri(a)gmail.com Reporter: jplesnik(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: andrea.veri(a)gmail.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest Fedora delivers 0.11 version. Upstream released 0.12. When you have free time, please upgrade it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 2072968] Review Request: perl-Alien-libmaxminddb - Find libmaxminddb
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 03 May '22

03 May '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072968 Michal Josef Spacek <mspacek(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mspacek(a)redhat.com Flags| |fedora-review? Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |mspacek(a)redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072968

1 0

[Bug 2081264] foo/* glob in %files sometimes packages the directory and sometimes does not
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 03 May '22

03 May '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081264 Panu Matilainen <pmatilai(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|rpm |perl-Test-Fake-HTTPD CC| |denis(a)fateyev.com Assignee|mdomonko(a)redhat.com |denis(a)fateyev.com --- Comment #4 from Panu Matilainen <pmatilai(a)redhat.com> --- > %{perl_privlib} expands to "/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl". Except that it doesn't, at least here on F35: [pmatilai🎩︎localhost]$ rpm --eval "%{perl_privlib}" /usr/share/perl5 [pmatilai🎩︎localhost]$ rpm --eval "%{perl_vendorlib}" /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl And that's why %{perl_privlib}/* ends up packaging /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl. I don't know the alleged difference between %{perl_privlib} and %{perl_vendorlib} but this is not an rpm bug, this is a packaging issue. Reassigning to perl-Test-Fake-HTTPD but if more packages are using %{perl_privlib} when they should be using %{perl_vendorlib} then then maybe there's a more generic issue, maybe one with packaging guidelines? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081264

1 0

[Bug 2081264] foo/* glob in %files sometimes packages the directory and sometimes does not
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 03 May '22

03 May '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081264 Michal Domonkos <mdomonko(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mdomonko(a)redhat.com Assignee|packaging-team-maint@redhat |mdomonko(a)redhat.com |.com | --- Comment #3 from Michal Domonkos <mdomonko(a)redhat.com> --- Yeah, %files globbing is janky at the moment, we have a PR pending that should help with that, although it remains to be seen if this is related. Assigning to self as I'm currently looking into that piece of code anyway. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081264

1 0

[Bug 2081264] foo/* glob in %files sometimes packages the directory and sometimes does not
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 03 May '22

03 May '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081264 --- Comment #2 from Panu Matilainen <pmatilai(a)redhat.com> --- Indeed /path/* should not package /path itself, so something's amiss here. Good spotting, thanks for the report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081264

1 0

[Bug 2081264] foo/* glob in %files sometimes packages the directory and sometimes does not
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 03 May '22

03 May '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081264 Petr Pisar <ppisar(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproj | |ect.org --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar <ppisar(a)redhat.com> --- Compare to perl-HTTP-Message-6.36-2.fc37 has a very similar %files section: %files %license LICENSE %doc Changes CONTRIBUTING.md README.md %{perl_vendorlib}/* %{_mandir}/man3/* but the /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl directory is not packaged: $ rpm -qlp noarch/perl-HTTP-Message-6.36-2.fc37.noarch.rpm | sort /usr/share/doc/perl-HTTP-Message /usr/share/doc/perl-HTTP-Message/Changes /usr/share/doc/perl-HTTP-Message/CONTRIBUTING.md /usr/share/doc/perl-HTTP-Message/README.md /usr/share/licenses/perl-HTTP-Message /usr/share/licenses/perl-HTTP-Message/LICENSE /usr/share/man/man3/HTTP::Config.3pm.gz /usr/share/man/man3/HTTP::Headers.3pm.gz /usr/share/man/man3/HTTP::Headers::Auth.3pm.gz /usr/share/man/man3/HTTP::Headers::ETag.3pm.gz /usr/share/man/man3/HTTP::Headers::Util.3pm.gz /usr/share/man/man3/HTTP::Message.3pm.gz /usr/share/man/man3/HTTP::Request.3pm.gz /usr/share/man/man3/HTTP::Request::Common.3pm.gz /usr/share/man/man3/HTTP::Response.3pm.gz /usr/share/man/man3/HTTP::Status.3pm.gz /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTTP /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTTP/Config.pm /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTTP/Headers /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTTP/Headers/Auth.pm /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTTP/Headers/ETag.pm /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTTP/Headers.pm /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTTP/Headers/Util.pm /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTTP/Message.pm /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTTP/Request /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTTP/Request/Common.pm /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTTP/Request.pm /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTTP/Response.pm /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTTP/Status.pm I found that many Perl packages now package that directory and they should not. At least that is not in intention of current Perl packaging guidelines <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Perl/#_directory_…>. This is how I discovered this issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081264

1 0

[rpms/perl-List-AllUtils] PR #2: Import perl-List-AllUtils to EPEL8
by Michal Josef Špaček 02 May '22

02 May '22

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-List-AllUtils` that you are following: `` Import perl-List-AllUtils to EPEL8 `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-List-AllUtils/pull-request/2

1 1

[Bug 2079983] New: perl-Mojolicious-9.25 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 01 May '22

01 May '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079983 Bug ID: 2079983 Summary: perl-Mojolicious-9.25 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Mojolicious Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, robinlee.sysu(a)gmail.com, yaneti(a)declera.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 9.25 Current version/release in rawhide: 9.24-1.fc37 URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Mojolicious Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/5966/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079983

1 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

perl-devel May 2022