https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2218170
Bug ID: 2218170
Summary: Please consider removing/porting aspell dependency.
Aspell has been deprecated
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Text-Aspell
Assignee: spotrh(a)gmail.com
Reporter: ljavorsk(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, spotrh(a)gmail.com
Blocks: 2210277
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Aspell has been deprecated since Fedora 39.
Please consider removing dependency on aspell, or porting it to the variants
like hunspell or enchant/enchant2.
Change proposal is located here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AspellDeprecation
FESCo approval is located here: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3009
If your component has already removed/ported it's aspell dependency, or you
don't Require/BuildRequire any aspell subpackage, feel free to close this
Bugzilla.
This Bugzilla was created automatically and some issues might have occurred
along the way.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210277
[Bug 2210277] Deprecation of aspell package
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2218170
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184301
Bug ID: 2184301
Summary: perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop-1.8.0-18.fc39 FTBFS:
t/01_basic.t and 3more test fail
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-Syntax-
Feature-Loop
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Link ID: CPAN 147485
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Package perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop fails to build from source in Fedora Rawhide.
Bareword found where operator expected at t/01_basic.t line 20, near "loop"
(Missing semicolon on previous line?)
syntax error at t/01_basic.t line 19, near "; last "
Global symbol "$s" requires explicit package name (did you forget to declare
"my $s"?) at t/01_basic.t line 20.
Global symbol "$i" requires explicit package name (did you forget to declare
"my $i"?) at t/01_basic.t line 20.
Global symbol "$s" requires explicit package name (did you forget to declare
"my $s"?) at t/01_basic.t line 20.
Global symbol "$s" requires explicit package name (did you forget to declare
"my $s"?) at t/01_basic.t line 21.
syntax error at t/01_basic.t line 22, near "}"
Can't redeclare "my" in "my" at t/01_basic.t line 26, near "my"
syntax error at t/01_basic.t line 28, near "last if"
syntax error at t/01_basic.t line 36, near "}"
syntax error at t/01_basic.t line 38, near "}"
t/01_basic.t has too many errors.
# Looks like your test exited with 2 before it could output anything.
t/01_basic.t ............
Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
Failed 4/4 subtests
Bareword found where operator expected at t/02_pragma_a.t line 28, near "is"
(Missing semicolon on previous line?)
syntax error at t/02_pragma_a.t line 27, near "; last"
BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at t/02_pragma_a.t line 31.
# Looks like your test exited with 2 before it could output anything.
t/02_pragma_a.t .........
Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
Failed 6/6 subtests
Bareword found where operator expected at t/02_pragma_b.t line 28, near "is"
(Missing semicolon on previous line?)
syntax error at t/02_pragma_b.t line 27, near "; last"
BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at t/02_pragma_b.t line 31.
# Looks like your test exited with 2 before it could output anything.
t/02_pragma_b.t .........
Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
Failed 6/6 subtests
Semicolon seems to be missing at t/03_line_numbers.t line 112.
syntax error at t/03_line_numbers.t line 102, near "is"
syntax error at t/03_line_numbers.t line 112, near "}"
Execution of t/03_line_numbers.t aborted due to compilation errors.
# Looks like your test exited with 255 before it could output anything.
t/03_line_numbers.t .....
Dubious, test returned 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00)
Failed 5/5 subtests
A difference between passing and failing build root is at
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/build/15176950. An update of perl-Lexical-Var
from 0.009-31.fc38 to 0.010-1.fc39 is suspicious.
Additional info:
This package is tracked by Koschei. See:
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184301
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803973
Bug ID: 1803973
Summary: CGI::Session is missing in epel8
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: perl-CGI-Session
Assignee: andreas(a)bawue.net
Reporter: netwiz(a)crc.id.au
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: andreas(a)bawue.net, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
The perl-CGI-Session package is not available for EPEL8.
Please import & build for EPEL8.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232293
Bug ID: 2232293
Summary: perl-TAP-Formatter-JUnit-0.16-4.fc40 FTBFS: Failed
test 't/data/tests/bailout'
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-TAP-For
matter-JUnit?collection=f40
Status: NEW
Component: perl-TAP-Formatter-JUnit
Assignee: paul(a)city-fan.org
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: paul(a)city-fan.org, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 2231791 (F40FTBFS,RAWHIDEFTBFS)
Target Milestone: ---
Link ID: Github bleargh45/TAP-Formatter-JUnit/issues/15
Classification: Fedora
perl-TAP-Formatter-JUnit-0.16-4.fc40 fails to build because a test fails:
# Failed test 't/data/tests/bailout'
# at t/formatter.t line 54.
# During compare:
# junk after document element at line 17, column 13, byte 381
# GOT: <testsuites>
# <testsuite failures="0"
# tests="5"
# errors="0"
# name="data_tests_bailout">
# <testcase name="1"></testcase>
# <testcase name="2"></testcase>
# <testcase name="3"></testcase>
# <system-out><![CDATA[1..5
# ok 1
# ok 2
# ok 3
# Bail out! GERONIMMMOOOOOO!!!
# ]]></system-out>
# <system-err></system-err>
# </testsuite>
# </testsuites><testsuites>
# <testsuite failures="0"
# tests="5"
# errors="0"
# name="data_tests_bailout">
# <testcase name="1"></testcase>
# <testcase name="2"></testcase>
# <testcase name="3"></testcase>
# <system-out></system-out>
# <system-err></system-err>
# </testsuite>
# </testsuites>
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 22.
This is triggered by upgrading perl-Test-Harness from 1:3.44-501.fc39 to
1:3.46-1.fc40.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231791
[Bug 2231791] Fedora 40 FTBFS Tracker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2232293
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028353
Bug ID: 2028353
Summary: Request to update perl-CDB_File to 1.03 (or newer)
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: perl-CDB_File
Severity: high
Assignee: mmckinst(a)umich.edu
Reporter: fhirtz(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: mmckinst(a)umich.edu, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Good morning,
I'm working with someone who's running into a significant issue with an
automation system that they use (quattor.org) due to a bug in the version of
perl-CDB_File that's currently available in EPEL.
The bug in question is:
https://github.com/toddr/CDB_File/commit/9147df2c426b6ef8530fbc501e030168e1…
This was addressed in version 1.03 and we were seeing if it might be possible
to either include the patch as a backport, or more likely rebase to 1.03 (or
newer)?
Thank you!
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-CDB_File-1.02
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028353
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037860
Bug ID: 2037860
Summary: Please branch and build perl-HTML-Element-Extended for
EPEL 9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-HTML-Element-Extended
Assignee: notting(a)splat.cc
Reporter: paul(a)city-fan.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr, notting(a)splat.cc,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Could you please branch and build perl-HTML-Element-Extended for EPEL 9 ?
If you like you could add me (FAS: pghmcfc) as a committer to the package and
I'll do it myself.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037860
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835353
Bug ID: 1835353
Summary: rubygem-mail: Out of memory issue through nested MIME
parts
Product: Security Response
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: vulnerability
Keywords: Security
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: security-response-team(a)redhat.com
Reporter: psampaio(a)redhat.com
CC: akarol(a)redhat.com, alexl(a)redhat.com,
bbuckingham(a)redhat.com, bcourt(a)redhat.com,
bkearney(a)redhat.com, btotty(a)redhat.com,
caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, caolanm(a)redhat.com,
dmetzger(a)redhat.com, gmccullo(a)redhat.com,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gtanzill(a)redhat.com, hhudgeon(a)redhat.com,
jfrey(a)redhat.com, jhardy(a)redhat.com,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, jose.p.oliveira.oss(a)gmail.com,
lzap(a)redhat.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
mmccune(a)redhat.com, nmoumoul(a)redhat.com,
obarenbo(a)redhat.com, paul(a)city-fan.org,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, rchan(a)redhat.com,
rhughes(a)redhat.com, rjerrido(a)redhat.com,
rob.myers(a)gtri.gatech.edu, roliveri(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
simaishi(a)redhat.com, smallamp(a)redhat.com,
sokeeffe(a)redhat.com, tbrisker(a)redhat.com,
tcallawa(a)redhat.com, vondruch(a)redhat.com,
walter.pete(a)yandex.com, xavier(a)bachelot.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Other
A possible DoS issue may affect several MIME parsers. Messages with too many
tiny nested MIME parts can lead to memory exhaustion on split().
References:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=960064https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=960062https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=960159https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=960158
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835355
Bug ID: 1835355
Summary: perl-Email-MIME-ContentType: rubygem-mail: Out of
memory issue through nested MIME parts [epel-all]
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel7
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Email-MIME-ContentType
Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Reporter: psampaio(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jose.p.oliveira.oss(a)gmail.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rob.myers(a)gtri.gatech.edu, tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of epel-all.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
fedpkg commit message.
NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora EPEL. While
only one tracking bug has been filed, please correct all affected versions
at the same time. If you need to fix the versions independent of each
other, you may clone this bug as appropriate.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830000
Bug ID: 1830000
Summary: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-PSGI for EL7
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-PSGI
Assignee: rc040203(a)freenet.de
Reporter: xavier(a)bachelot.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rc040203(a)freenet.de
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hi,
Could you please build perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-PSGI in EPEL 7 ?
It's in the dependency chain of a package I'd like to build for EPEL 7.
Regards,
Xavier
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.