https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376845
Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Blocks| |182235 (FE-Legal) Resolution|NOTABUG |--- Keywords| |Reopened
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com --- I don't agree with your resolution.
c/ppport.h is "GPL+ or Artistic". Because Fedora does not permit Artistic, the file is compiled as "GPL+". And if you link GPL+ code into an Artistic 2.0 code (lib/Params/Validate/XS.c), the result is tainted by GPL. Thus the binary package must state GPL+ in the license tag.
Raising to the Fedora legal team for a decision.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235 [Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker