On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Dave Cross wrote:
>
> Gabor Szabo wrote:
>
>>
>> 2008/8/29 Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano(a)redhat.com>:
>>
>>>
>>> I try to find solution for missing shared objects on internet, but I
>>> found
>>> only your question on the same problem ;-) Could be possible that Wx is
>>> broken? There are some seriously looking bugs at
>>>
http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Dist/Display.html?Name=Wx
>>> I hope that you found out at conference and now I go to test your new
>>> version of padre.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Marcela,
>>
>> as a start you can try to download the binary version of Padre
>> so at least we'll know if that works in Fedora.
>>
http://padre.perlide.org/wiki/Download
>>
>
> I've successfully downloaded and run your prebuilt version of Padre on
> Fedora 9. I get an error on startup but it seems to work fine. I haven't
> actually tried to do much with it.
>
>
>>
>> BTW 0.06 has been released with a slightly different set of prereqs.
>>
>> Wx is indeed difficult to install and I don't have much knowledge about
>> it.
>> Maybe you could post the errors on the wxperl mailing list
>>
http://wxperl.sourceforge.net/support.html
>>
>
> The problem doesn't seem to be Wx. There's already a prebuild perl-Wx in
> the Fedora repositories.
>
> There are a few of your other pre-reqs missing from the Fedora
> repositories, but the only one I'm having any trouble building is
> Wx::Perl::ProcessStream. That seems to fail some (most?) of its tests on
> my machine.
>
> I'll carry on trying and let you know how it goes.
>
>
Wx::Perl::ProcessStream is now in rawhide.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457505 I'm still working on
building all missing requirements.
Great.
please note that Perlysense that as a (missing) prereq in earlier versions
(and might become one again later on) is not a prereq for 0.06
Gabor