[Bug 2348413] New: Please branch and build perl-Switch for EPEL 10

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2348413

Bug ID: 2348413
           Summary: Please branch and build perl-Switch for EPEL 10
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
            Status: NEW
         Component: perl-Switch
          Assignee: [e-mail]
          Reporter: [e-mail]
        QA Contact: [e-mail]
                CC: [e-mail], [e-mail]
            Blocks: 2303880 (EPEL10Tracker)
  Target Milestone: ---
    Classification: Fedora

Hi,

Could you please branch and build perl-Switch for EPEL 10 ?
I would need it to build another package.

If you don't want or have time to maintain this package in EPEL, I'd be glad
to be added to the package so I can take care of it.
Indeed, I can help with maintainance in Fedora too.
My FAS username is xavierb.

Regards,
Xavier

Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303880
[Bug 2303880] EPEL 10 Tracker

[Bug 2348413] Please branch and build perl-Switch for EPEL 10

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2348413

Xavier Bachelot  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |2344510

Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2344510
[Bug 2344510] opendmarc-tools: fails to install from epel10

[Bug 2348413] Please branch and build perl-Switch for EPEL 10

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2348413

Xavier Bachelot  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |needinfo?([e-mail])

--- Comment #1 from Xavier Bachelot  ---
Hi Spot,

I'm still interested in this in order to unblock opendmarc.

Regards,
Xavier

[Bug 2348413] Please branch and build perl-Switch for EPEL 10

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2348413

Tom "spot" Callaway  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|needinfo?([e-mail]) |

--- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway  ---
You have admin on perl-Switch now, sorry for the delay!

~spot

[Bug 2348413] Please branch and build perl-Switch for EPEL 10

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2348413

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |MODIFIED

--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-0ee432591f (perl-Switch-2.17-33.el10_0) has been submitted as
an update to Fedora EPEL 10.0.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-0ee432591f

[Bug 2348413] Please branch and build perl-Switch for EPEL 10

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2348413

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |MODIFIED

--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-0ee432591f (perl-Switch-2.17-33.el10_0) has been submitted as
an update to Fedora EPEL 10.0.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-0ee432591f

--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-9ad59f651e (perl-Switch-2.17-33.el10_1) has been submitted as
an update to Fedora EPEL 10.1.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-9ad59f651e

[Bug 2348413] Please branch and build perl-Switch for EPEL 10

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2348413

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |ON_QA

--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-9ad59f651e has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.1 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-9ad59f651e

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.

[Bug 2348413] Please branch and build perl-Switch for EPEL 10

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2348413

--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-0ee432591f has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.0 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-0ee432591f

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.

[Bug 2348413] Please branch and build perl-Switch for EPEL 10

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2348413

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ON_QA                       |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|                            |perl-Switch-2.17-33.el10_1
         Resolution|---                         |ERRATA
        Last Closed|                            |2025-06-13 01:14:06

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-9ad59f651e (perl-Switch-2.17-33.el10_1) has been pushed to the
Fedora EPEL 10.1 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

[Bug 2348413] Please branch and build perl-Switch for EPEL 10

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2348413

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Fixed In Version|perl-Switch-2.17-33.el10_1  |perl-Switch-2.17-33.el10_1
                   |                            |perl-Switch-2.17-33.el10_0

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-0ee432591f (perl-Switch-2.17-33.el10_0) has been pushed to the
Fedora EPEL 10.0 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.