Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611015
Summary: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: low Component: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule AssignedTo: steve@silug.org ReportedBy: rc040203@freenet.de QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: steve@silug.org, fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora
Description of problem: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule fails to build in rawhide.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-5.fc14
How reproducible: Always.
Steps to Reproduce: 1. rebuild the package
Actual results: Fails to build.
Expected results: Success.
Additional info: * Apparently this package is incompatible to perl-5.12 and can't be built against it. * Its upstream appears dead.
This package needs to be made working or it will have to be removed from Fedora >= 14. AFAICT, this package is not used by Fedora itself, so it's probably safe to remove it.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611015
Ralf Corsepius rc040203@freenet.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmaslano@redhat.com Blocks| |538278(F14Target) Summary|perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule |perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule | |fails to build
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611015
Iain Arnell iarnell@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |614982
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611015
Iain Arnell iarnell@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |iarnell@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell iarnell@gmail.com 2010-07-25 07:03:59 EDT --- This should be simple to fix. It's only t/ast/00-basic.t that is failing due to different indentation of Data::Dumper. And as a bonus, when it fails, it writes out a new t/ast/00-basic.t_ file with the correct indentation.
make test # fails diff -b t/ast/00-basic.t t/ast/00-basic.t_ # no difference mv -f t/ast/00-basic.t_ t/ast/00-basic.t make test # succeeds
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611015
Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ppisar@redhat.com
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com 2010-07-26 06:38:05 EDT --- Checking test results on CPAN, results on different perl versions, checking source code show the problem is more mysterious.
More ever adding some debugging prints into the test one can see Data::Dumper treat local hashes and AST hashes in different manner.
In addition if we patch the tests, it will start failing on lower perls.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611015
--- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius rc040203@freenet.de 2010-07-26 07:43:36 EDT --- Openly said, I don't see much sense in trying to "fix" this package.
It's not used by Fedora, its upstream build-matrix (http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=Pugs-Compiler-Rule+0.37) also speaks a very clear language.
My vote goes to "let this package die".
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611015
--- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell iarnell@gmail.com 2010-07-27 13:24:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2)
Checking test results on CPAN, results on different perl versions, checking source code show the problem is more mysterious.
Certainly, bleadperl is throwing up more problems.
More ever adding some debugging prints into the test one can see Data::Dumper treat local hashes and AST hashes in different manner.
Just more indentation differences? Or really different?
In addition if we patch the tests, it will start failing on lower perls.
Not too much of a problem for us. Either patch the tests only in f14+, or better, simply do something like:
make test \ || diff -qb t/ast/00-basic.t{,_} \ && mv -f t/ast/00-basic.t{_,} \ && make test
(In reply to comment #3)
Openly said, I don't see much sense in trying to "fix" this package.
At the minute, the package itself doesn't seem to be broken - only its tests fail for an understandable reason.
It's not used by Fedora,
Think of the DarkPAN!
its upstream build-matrix (http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=Pugs-Compiler-Rule+0.37) also speaks a very clear language.
That its test fail - but we can see why.
My vote goes to "let this package die".
I don't really mind either way. Just playing devil's advocate. But according to rel-eng, Steve needs to kill it, not you (or us).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611015
--- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com 2010-07-27 13:39:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #2)
More ever adding some debugging prints into the test one can see Data::Dumper treat local hashes and AST hashes in different manner.
Just more indentation differences? Or really different?
Just indentation. Different number of spaces before hash keys and closing bracket. (If I recall properly.).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611015
Marcela Mašláňová mmaslano@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE
--- Comment #7 from Marcela Mašláňová mmaslano@redhat.com 2010-08-10 08:13:59 EDT --- I removed the test. Mainly because I haven't permission to remove this package from distro.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611015
Ralf Corsepius rc040203@freenet.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE |
--- Comment #8 from Ralf Corsepius rc040203@freenet.de 2010-08-10 08:47:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7)
I removed the test.
Please no. What are you trying to achieve? Playing down this package's brokenness? This is not helpful.
Mainly because I haven't permission to remove this package from distro.
Rel-eng made very clear that they want to cope with this package.
REOPENING.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611015
Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |CPAN 69816
--- Comment #9 from Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com 2011-07-26 09:30:48 EDT --- There is another problem within Perl 5.14.1: https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=69816
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611015
Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(steve@silug.org)
--- Comment #10 from Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com 2011-09-01 09:40:07 EDT --- Steven, please kill (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageEndOfLife) this package.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611015
Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo?(steve@silug.org) | Last Closed|2010-08-10 08:13:59 |2011-11-09 03:03:24
--- Comment #11 from Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com 2011-11-09 03:03:24 EST --- Package blocked in Koji (in F17 only?) https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4976.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611015
Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |goeran@uddeborg.se
--- Comment #12 from Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com 2012-01-02 09:43:36 EST --- *** Bug 770960 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org