Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193818
Summary: spamd should start before sendmail Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: spamassassin AssignedTo: wtogami@redhat.com ReportedBy: oliva@lsd.ic.unicamp.br CC: fedora-perl-devel- list@redhat.com,felicity@kluge.net,jm@jmason.org,parkerm @pobox.com,reg+redhat@sidney.com,wtogami@redhat.com
Description of problem: Users that rely on spamc/spamd for mail delivery might face silent mail delivery failure if spamd is not running when sendmail attempts to deliver them e-mail. Starting spamd before sendmail would reduce the probability of such a problem.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): sendmail-8.13.6-1 spamassassin-3.1.2-1.fc6
How reproducible: Every time
Steps to Reproduce: 1.Boot up
Actual results: spamd starts after sendmail
Expected results: It should start before
Additional info: both are S80, which causes sendmail to start first since it sorts alphabetically before spamd.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: spamd should start before sendmail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193818
paul@city-fan.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul@city-fan.org
------- Additional Comments From paul@city-fan.org 2006-06-02 03:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0)
Additional info: both are S80, which causes sendmail to start first since it sorts alphabetically before spamd.
It should also start before spamass-milter, which in Extras is S79 to ensure that *it* starts before sendmail.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: spamd should start before sendmail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193818
------- Additional Comments From wtogami@redhat.com 2006-06-02 10:19 EST ------- So S78 then?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: spamd should start before sendmail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193818
------- Additional Comments From paul@city-fan.org 2006-06-02 10:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2)
So S78 then?
WORKSFORME.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: spamd should start before sendmail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193818
wtogami@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE
------- Additional Comments From wtogami@redhat.com 2006-06-07 11:34 EST ------- Going into FC6 for now. Will bring this back into FC5 later. Does chkconfig properly handle removing the previous S80 files when this number is changed?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: spamd should start before sendmail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193818
------- Additional Comments From paul@city-fan.org 2006-06-07 12:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4)
Going into FC6 for now. Will bring this back into FC5 later. Does chkconfig properly handle removing the previous S80 files when this number is changed?
No, you would need some trickery like this to fix the starting sequence:
/sbin/chkconfig --add spamassassin LEVELS=$(/sbin/chkconfig --list spamassassin | sed -e 's/[0-6]:off//g;s/[^0-6]//g') /sbin/chkconfig --del spamassassin /sbin/chkconfig --add spamassassin [ -n "$LEVELS" ] && /sbin/chkconfig --levels $LEVELS spamassassin on
The first --add makes sure that chkconfig knows about spamassassin for a first-time install, and has no effect on upgrades.
The subsequent stuff records the current runlevels, removes the existing links, adds in new ones, and restores the runlevels to the original settings.
A facility to do something like this would be nice to have within chkconfig itself of course.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: spamd should start before sendmail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193818
wtogami@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|RAWHIDE |
------- Additional Comments From wtogami@redhat.com 2006-06-07 15:13 EST ------- Argh... this is quite a mess.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: spamd should start before sendmail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193818
------- Additional Comments From paul@city-fan.org 2006-11-08 05:16 EST ------- Since this is fixed in FC6, the bug can be closed, can't it?
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org