Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229179
Summary: check_whitelist and check_spamd scripts missing. Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: normal Component: spamassassin AssignedTo: wtogami@redhat.com ReportedBy: m.d.t.evans@qmul.ac.uk CC: fedora-perl-devel- list@redhat.com,felicity@kluge.net,jm@jmason.org,parkerm @pobox.com,reg+redhat@sidney.com,wtogami@redhat.com
Description of problem:
The SA source contains 2 useful perl scripts, one to maintain the autowhitelist database file and a nagios monitoring script. It would be helpful if you could include them. I've attached a patch below (which you will may want to tweak a bit).
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 3.1.8-1.fc6
------- Additional Comments From m.d.t.evans@qmul.ac.uk 2007-02-19 07:00 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=148315) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=148315&action=vie...) Patch file for spamassassin that adds check_whitelist and check_spamd scripts.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: check_whitelist and check_spamd scripts missing.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229179
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Core |Fedora Version|fc6 |6
fedora-triage-list@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-triage- | |list@redhat.com Status Whiteboard| | bzcl34nup
------- Additional Comments From fedora-triage-list@redhat.com 2008-04-04 02:17 EST ------- Fedora apologizes that these issues have not been resolved yet. We're sorry it's taken so long for your bug to be properly triaged and acted on. We appreciate the time you took to report this issue and want to make sure no important bugs slip through the cracks.
If you're currently running a version of Fedora Core between 1 and 6, please note that Fedora no longer maintains these releases. We strongly encourage you to upgrade to a current Fedora release. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are flagging all of the open bugs for releases which are no longer maintained and closing them. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LifeCycle/EOL
If this bug is still open against Fedora Core 1 through 6, thirty days from now, it will be closed 'WONTFIX'. If you can reporduce this bug in the latest Fedora version, please change to the respective version. If you are unable to do this, please add a comment to this bug requesting the change.
Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled these issues to this point.
The process we are following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp
We will be following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this doesn't happen again.
And if you'd like to join the bug triage team to help make things better, check out http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: check_whitelist and check_spamd scripts missing.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229179
fedora-triage-list@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: check_whitelist and check_spamd scripts missing.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229179
jm@jmason.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| bzcl34nup |bzcl34nup Version|6 |8
------- Additional Comments From jm@jmason.org 2008-04-04 04:46 EST ------- this is still an issue against the current version.
fwiw, I think this is a good idea and have opened it upstream: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5873
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: check_whitelist and check_spamd scripts missing.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229179
bos@serpentine.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|low |medium Version|8 |9
------- Additional Comments From bos@serpentine.com 2008-05-25 01:50 EST ------- Still missing in F-9. Since I'd actually like to use check_whitelist, I'm bumping the severity.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229179
Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|wtogami@redhat.com |kevin@tummy.com
--- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2008-12-15 19:33:36 EDT --- It sounds like upstream is considering this for 3.0, but may rename the commands?
I don't see why we can't ship them now however. Will see about pushing the change into rawhide, and then if all looks well, the next upstream update we can push them into stable releases.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229179
--- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2008-12-16 00:49:14 EDT --- I spoke too soon. These scripts are no longer shipped with 3.2.5 that I can see. Can you provide an updated patch with their locations?
Or perhaps they are called something else?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229179
--- Comment #7 from Martin m.d.t.evans@qmul.ac.uk 2008-12-16 09:32:44 EDT --- The upstream report says that it is a milestone for the 3.3 release. I can't find any reason for their removal (actually they removed the entire tools/ and contrib/ folders in 3.2).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229179
--- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2008-12-16 15:34:38 EDT --- ok, so what shall we do here? Wait until 3.3 and then add them when upstream does? If so, should we close this now? or leave it open?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229179
--- Comment #9 from Martin m.d.t.evans@qmul.ac.uk 2008-12-17 05:08:10 EDT --- I think we should leave it open until the upstream bug report is closed.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229179
Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |SpamAssassin 5873
--- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2008-12-17 11:12:58 EDT --- ok. Sounds fine to me. If you do notice anything related to this please do update the bug so we see it.
I will also add the upstream bug linked to this.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229179
--- Comment #11 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-list@redhat.com 2009-06-09 18:27:49 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life.
Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.
Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229179
Bug Zapper fedora-triage-list@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #12 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-list@redhat.com 2009-07-14 13:07:02 EDT ---
Fedora 9 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-07-10. Fedora 9 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.
If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version.
Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org