Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
--- Comment #8 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de> 2008-12-01 10:51:20 EDT
(In reply to comment #7)
Documentation is for humans to read. If a script is truly just
then packaging it as executable is just as much a defect as packaging man pages
with executable bits set.
Documentation containing non-executeable scripts are crippled docs.
But that's well into the land of "spec and packaging
hygiene and policies" department which I've zero interest in arguing over, and
little to do with the actual issue here.
Note that the patch does not change
any type definitions, and by making the logic for limit macros match
for the corresponding type definitions more closely it makes the header
much easier to check by inspection than it presently is.
You have, because rpm is your job and because it's your rpm which
* is producing broken results.
* forces users to cripple their packages.
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.