Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: SVK fails because it cannot find Time/Progress.pm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483772
Summary: SVK fails because it cannot find Time/Progress.pm Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: urgent Priority: low Component: perl-SVK AssignedTo: ianburrell@gmail.com ReportedBy: warlord@mit.edu QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: ianburrell@gmail.com, fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
I just upgraded Fedora 10 yesterday and this morning I noticed that SVK isn't working anymore. When I try to sync I get:
Can't locate Time/Progress.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.0 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl .) at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/SVK/Notify.pm line 214.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-SVK-2.2.1-1.fc10.noarch
How reproducible:
Seems to happen every time I try to use "svk sync". Some other svk operations seem to work okay.
Steps to Reproduce: 1. yum update (as of 2009-02-03 10:20am US/EST) 2. svk sync <depotpath> 3.
Actual results:
See above
Expected results:
It should sync.
Additional info:
I cannot find Time/Progress.pm in a package.. And indeed the perl-SVK RPM doesn't depend on perl(Time/Progress.pm) for some odd reason... Probably because the "require Time/Progress.pm" is within a subroutine instead of global?
But this bug makes SVK practically useless.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483772
--- Comment #1 from Derek Atkins warlord@mit.edu 2009-02-03 12:39:52 EDT --- For the record, I found, downloaded, and rebuilt perl-Time-Progress-1.3-1.fc9.src.rpm from http://rpm.mag-sol.com/Fedora/9/SRPMS/?C=N;O=D and when I installed the RPM then svk started working.
So really what needs to happen is:
1) the SVK RPM needs to depend on the Time::Progress perl module, and 2) you need to distribute the Time::Progress perl module in the yum repo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483772
Ian Burrell ianburrell@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Ian Burrell ianburrell@gmail.com 2009-02-05 16:54:40 EDT --- I missed that Time::Progress had been added to the requirements for the new version. I am not sure why the auto-requires script did not detect it. Or why the Makefile.PL did not fail when it wasn't present for build.
I added the requirement to the spec. I submitted perl-Time-Progress for review (#484293).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483772
Ian Burrell ianburrell@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |484293
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483772
Bug 483772 depends on bug 484293, which changed state.
Bug 484293 Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Progress - Elapsed and estimated finish time reporting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484293
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483772
--- Comment #3 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-list@redhat.com 2009-11-18 04:28:26 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 10 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 10. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '10'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 10's end of life.
Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 10 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.
Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483772
Bug Zapper fedora-triage-list@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #4 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-list@redhat.com 2009-12-18 02:48:10 EDT ---
Fedora 10 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-12-17. Fedora 10 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.
If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version.
Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483772
Ian Burrell ianburrell@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |CURRENTRELEASE
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org