[Bug 228433] New: perl-version: EPEL branch?

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228433

           Summary: perl-version: EPEL branch?
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: normal
         Component: perl-version
        AssignedTo: tcallawa(a)redhat.com
        ReportedBy: cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu
         QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
                CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com


A project I'm working on uses perl(version) on RHEL4.  Any chance of an EPEL
branch? :)

(note -- the specfile currently uses Build.PL; as perl-Module-Build isn't
available in EPEL yet, it'll probably be necessary to switch over to the
standard Makefile.PL provided.)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug 228433] perl-version: EPEL branch?

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: perl-version: EPEL branch?


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228433





------- Additional Comments From cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu  2007-02-13 00:11 EST -------
Erm, scratch that last bit.  The spec does indeed build via Makefile.PL.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug 228433] perl-version: EPEL branch?

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: perl-version: EPEL branch?


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228433





------- Additional Comments From cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu  2007-02-13 00:51 EST -------
...and to build on that, it would appear that since the spec is using
Makefile.PL to build, the buildreq on perl(Module::Build) >= 0.2611 is spurious.
 perl-version builds nicely in mock with that br removed and without other
alterations.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Steven Pritchard]

On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 12:01:16AM -0500, bugzilla(a)redhat.com wrote:
>  (note -- the specfile currently uses Build.PL; as perl-Module-Build
> isn't
>  available in EPEL yet, it'll probably be necessary to switch over to the
>  standard Makefile.PL provided.) 
Of course, the only reason Module::Build isn't available in EPEL yet
is I haven't got around to it yet.  :-)

Steve
-- 
Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc.
Email: steve(a)kspei.com             http://www.kspei.com/
Phone: [phone]               Mobile: [phone]

[Chris Weyl]

On 2/13/07, Steven Pritchard <steve(a)silug.org&gt; wrote:
>  On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 12:01:16AM -0500, bugzilla(a)redhat.com wrote:
>  > (note -- the specfile currently uses Build.PL; as perl-Module-Build isn't
>  > available in EPEL yet, it'll probably be necessary to switch over to the
>  > standard Makefile.PL provided.)
>
>  Of course, the only reason Module::Build isn't available in EPEL yet
>  is I haven't got around to it yet.  :-) 
That's definitely a module I'd like to see in EPEL.  Being w/o it
makes things... difficult. :)

                          -Chris

-- 
Chris Weyl
Ex astris, scientia

[Steven Pritchard]

On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 01:09:21PM -0800, Chris Weyl wrote:
>  That's definitely a module I'd like to see in EPEL.  Being
> w/o it
>  makes things... difficult. :) 
I've been a little out of the loop lately...  I don't suppose you have
a pointer to the procedure for making EPEL branches and such handy, do
you?

Steve
-- 
Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc.
Email: steve(a)kspei.com             http://www.kspei.com/
Phone: [phone]               Mobile: [phone]

[Chris Weyl]

On 2/14/07, Steven Pritchard <steve(a)silug.org&gt; wrote:
>  On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 01:09:21PM -0800, Chris Weyl wrote:
>  > That's definitely a module I'd like to see in EPEL.  Being w/o it
>  > makes things... difficult. :)
>
>  I've been a little out of the loop lately...  I don't suppose you have
>  a pointer to the procedure for making EPEL branches and such handy, do
>  you? 
Yah.  Unless something else has changed in the last couple days, it's
just a matter of:

1. adding a branch request to CVSSyncNeeded with EL-4 as the branch, and
2. sending a note to cvsadmin-members(a)fedoraproject.org with the lines
to be added to owners.epel (essentially the same as in owners.list).

The branch will just show up as EL-4, and behave the way one expects
it to, once the cvs admins have worked their magic.

At least, that's the way I've been doing it :)

                     -Chris

-- 
Chris Weyl
Ex astris, scientia

[Paul Howarth]

On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 16:23 -0800, Chris Weyl wrote:
>  On 2/14/07, Steven Pritchard <steve(a)silug.org&gt; wrote:
>  > On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 01:09:21PM -0800, Chris Weyl wrote:
>  > > That's definitely a module I'd like to see in EPEL.  Being w/o it
>  > > makes things... difficult. :)
>  >
>  > I've been a little out of the loop lately...  I don't suppose you have
>  > a pointer to the procedure for making EPEL branches and such handy, do
>  > you?
>  
>  Yah.  Unless something else has changed in the last couple days, it's
>  just a matter of:
>  
>  1. adding a branch request to CVSSyncNeeded with EL-4 as the branch, and
>  2. sending a note to cvsadmin-members(a)fedoraproject.org with the lines
>  to be added to owners.epel (essentially the same as in owners.list).
>  
>  The branch will just show up as EL-4, and behave the way one expects
>  it to, once the cvs admins have worked their magic.
>  
>  At least, that's the way I've been doing it :) 
You can also request EL-5 branches if you'll be supporting the next
release too...

Paul.

[Bug 228433] perl-version: EPEL branch?

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: perl-version: EPEL branch?


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228433





------- Additional Comments From tcallawa(a)redhat.com  2007-04-04 19:04 EST -------
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: perl-version
New Branches: EL-4 EL-5
Updated EPEL Owners: tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Updated EPEL CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug 228433] perl-version: EPEL branch?

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: perl-version: EPEL branch?


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228433


tcallawa(a)redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-cvs?




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug 228433] perl-version: EPEL branch?

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: perl-version: EPEL branch?


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228433


petersen(a)redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
               Flag|fedora-cvs?                 |fedora-cvs+




------- Additional Comments From petersen(a)redhat.com  2007-04-06 01:59 EST -------
added

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug 228433] perl-version: EPEL branch?

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: perl-version: EPEL branch?


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228433


bugzilla(a)redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|normal                      |medium
            Product|Fedora Extras               |Fedora

tcallawa(a)redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




------- Additional Comments From tcallawa(a)redhat.com  2007-07-03 13:54 EST -------
Built. Sorry it took so long. :/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug 228433] perl-version: EPEL branch?

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228433

Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano(a)redhat.com&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-cvs+                 |fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #6 from Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano(a)redhat.com&gt; 2011-01-31 03:27:30 EST
---
We resurrected this package for dual-life modules. Could it be brought to life
again? It's already unblocked, but now we are missing permissions.

Spot, if you like, add yourself among maintainers.

Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: perl-version
New Branches: f14 EL-6
Owners: mmaslano ppisar psabata
InitialCC: perl-sig

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 228433] perl-version: EPEL branch?

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228433

Paul Howarth <paul(a)city-fan.org&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |paul(a)city-fan.org

--- Comment #7 from Paul Howarth <paul(a)city-fan.org&gt; 2011-01-31 05:00:09 EST ---
I don't think we can add an EL-6 branch as that would update a package from
RHEL-6.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 228433] perl-version: EPEL branch?

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228433

--- Comment #8 from Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano(a)redhat.com&gt; 2011-01-31 05:45:27 EST
---
You are right.

Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: perl-version
New Branches: f14
Owners: mmaslano ppisar psabata
InitialCC: perl-sig

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 228433] perl-version: EPEL branch?

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228433

--- Comment #9 from Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com&gt; 2011-02-02 17:28:33 EST
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.