Zend's PDT
by Konstantin Ryabitsev
So... Does anyone feel brave enough to try packaging PDT? :)
http://zend.com/pdt/
Cheers,
--
Konstantin Ryabitsev
Montréal, Québec
15 years, 9 months
Re: [Fedora-php-devel-list] pecl list-upgrades not working?
by Remi Collet
Christopher Stone a écrit :
>> If we update pear to introduce a new version and macro which are
>> required to register the pecl extension, we need a mass-rebuild,
>> whatever is the new version (1.5.x or 1.6.x) (and new Requires).
>
> Would the pecl packages be *required* to be rebuilt? Would their
> behavior be the same as they are now if they are not rebuilt? If we
> rebuild the pecl packages it only makes it so they show up correctly
> with the pecl command, correct?
>
You're right.
Package not rebuild will still work without being registered.
Note that some pecl extension still doesn't register on F8.
Remi.
16 years
Re: [Fedora-php-devel-list] pecl list-upgrades not working?
by Remi Collet
Christopher Stone a écrit :
> Ah I see, I wonder why minor point releases are not updated on
> supported Fedora distributions. You think there could be a
> possibility we could co-maintain php-pear with Joe and do point
> releases on supported stable fedora repositories?
I'm already co-maintainer on php-pear.
pear-1.6.x use a totally new spec (1.5.x use an upstream .phar, 1.6.x
use the upstream .tar.gz).
I agree we should push 1.6.x to F7 (it's a security update because pear
< 1.5.4 as security issues) but we must ask Joe about this.
Regards
16 years
pecl list-upgrades not working?
by Christopher Stone
I maintain several pear and pecl packages, and I usually check for
pear updates using the pear list-upgrades alpha command. However I
noticed that none of my pecl packages show up with a pecl list
command. Is there a bug in the way we are packaging our pecl packages
or is this a bug with pecl? I'm still using Fedora 7, BTW so I may
not have the latest and greatest php-pear package.
16 years
