Zend's PDT
by Konstantin Ryabitsev
So... Does anyone feel brave enough to try packaging PDT? :)
http://zend.com/pdt/
Cheers,
--
Konstantin Ryabitsev
Montréal, Québec
15 years, 9 months
php-pear 1.6.1
by Remi Collet
Joe Orton a écrit :
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 08:57:43PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
>
>> I could probably push php-pear 1.6.1 to devel.
>> Of course, if you agree to use a "home made" install-pear-nozlib.phar
>> because upstream still provides 1.5.4.
>>
>
> I don't like that idea still. Can you bring this up on the list so we
> can all discuss it? I think there was a way to bootstrap from the .tgz
> releases instead, which we could switch to.
>
The solution seems to use (very short resume) :
php install-pear.php *.tgz
Work a little on this, here is my specfile :
http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/SPEC/php-pear-test.spec
http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/SRPMS/php-pear-1.6.1-3.fc7.remi.src.rpm
Of course, build work in mock :
http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-1.6.1-build.log
It only use upstream .tgz and "install-pear.php" from CVS (the one which
is bundled in the .phar)
Some cleanup from old 1.5.x are no more required (use of INSTALL_ROOT),
some still needed (pear.conf)
Remi
16 years, 4 months
Dependencies on php vs php-common
by Tim Jackson
Looking at a random selection of packages I have on a machine, there are
quite a few things that depend on the "php" package. For example on an FC6
system:
# rpm -q --whatrequires php
php-pear-1.4.9-4
php-pear-DB-1.7.6-7.fc6
php-pear-PHPUnit-1.3.2-1.fc6
squirrelmail-1.4.10a-1.fc6
php-adodb-4.94-1.fc6
mantis-1.0.8-1.fc6
php-devel-5.1.6-3.6.fc6
Should these in general not be dependent on php-common rather than php,
since "php" now basically contains just Apache HTTPD-related stuff?
(php-adodb should probably also only have an indirect dep via php(abi),
which is provided by php-common; I haven't checked if that's different in
fc7/devel)
Tim
16 years, 4 months
/var/lib/php/session
by Tim Jackson
These days after all the cleanups, the "php" package (vs php-common)
pretty much just contains Apache HTTPD-related stuff:
# rpm -ql php
/etc/httpd/conf.d/php.conf
/usr/lib/httpd/modules/libphp5.so
/var/lib/php/session
/var/www/icons/php.gif
So in theory it should be OK to remove this if you need PHP but not the
HTTPD stuff (for example if you are using CGI or CLI only).
However, you'll notice /var/lib/php/session in the above list. This
doesn't seem to be specific to HTTPD and indeed is useful if you are using
php-cgi from a webserver. Indeed, the path is compiled into the binaries;
for example:
$ php-a
Interactive shell
php > echo ini_get('session.save_path');
/var/lib/php/session
So I think we should probably move it to php-common - what do others think?
Tim
16 years, 4 months
PHP Dependency Problems on EL5
by Christopher Stone
Is php-mcrypt and php-mhash not built on EL-5? What are the missing
requirement?
php-pear-Crypt-CHAP - 1.0.1-1.el5.noarch requires php-mcrypt
php-pear-Crypt-CHAP - 1.0.1-1.el5.noarch requires php-mhash
Thanks in advance,
-Chris
16 years, 5 months
[Fwd: Re: [Fedora-php-devel-list] Pear in EL-4]
by Remi Collet
Don't understand why this list haven't a "reply-to" header like other...
-------- Message original --------
Sujet: Re: [Fedora-php-devel-list] Pear in EL-4
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:43:15 -0500
De: Brandon Holbrook <fedora(a)theholbrooks.org>
Pour :: Remi Collet <Fedora(a)FamilleCollet.com>
Références: <46907AF2.4020606(a)theholbrooks.org>
<46912C1F.1060405(a)FamilleCollet.com> <46927A52.5020307(a)FamilleCollet.com>
Joe, any comments on building a new php-pear for epel4 that would allow
us to include our existing pear packages?
-Brandon
Remi Collet wrote:
> Remi Collet a écrit :
>
>
>> RHEL also provides this in the "Red Hat Web Application Stack" channel
>> (to be verified, i only see php-5.1.2 and pear-1.4.6 on the beta
>> channel, but i know php-5.1.6 is available as we use it in my company)
>> but without support AFAIK.
>>
>
> I've checked. In fact only php-5.1.2 and pear-1.4.6 available on RHEL in
> the "Red Hat Web Application Stack" channel.
>
> Remi.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora-php-devel-list mailing list
> Fedora-php-devel-list(a)redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-php-devel-list
>
16 years, 5 months
Pear in EL-4
by Brandon Holbrook
All, it doesn't look like anyone has attempted to branch their pear
packages for EL-4. I received a request recently for Mail_Mime to be
included in EL-4 as a dependency for roundcube
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575). However,
I am quickly finding out this isn't just a simple branch-and-build. It
looks like the php-pear package in core is still arch-specific and built
from php's srpm... which puts up major roadblocks for making pear
packages noarch and dependent on the rpm-version of PEAR instead of PHP.
Has anyone attempted to build pear packages on top of EL-4's existing
pear package? Would it (ideally) be possible to build a new
php-pear.noarch RPM as part of epel? There is already a 1.4.11 RPM in
the centosplus repo that is exactly what we need. If not, we need to
decided on a new pear policy for EL4, either no pear packages or craft a
new arch-specific spec file template.
-Brandon
16 years, 5 months
