[Fwd: Re: [Fedora-php-devel-list] Pear in EL-4]

[Remi Collet]

Don't understand why this list haven't a "reply-to" header like
other...


-------- Message original --------
Sujet: 	Re: [Fedora-php-devel-list] Pear in EL-4
Date: 	Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:43:15 -0500
De: 	Brandon Holbrook <fedora(a)theholbrooks.org&gt;
Pour :: 	Remi Collet <Fedora(a)FamilleCollet.com&gt;
Références: 	<46907AF2.4020606(a)theholbrooks.org&gt;
<46912C1F.1060405(a)FamilleCollet.com&gt; <46927A52.5020307(a)FamilleCollet.com&gt;



Joe, any comments on building a new php-pear for epel4 that would allow 
us to include our existing pear packages?

-Brandon

Remi Collet wrote:
>  Remi Collet a écrit :
>
>    
> > RHEL also provides this in the "Red Hat Web Application Stack" channel
> > (to be verified, i only see php-5.1.2 and pear-1.4.6 on the beta
> > channel, but i know php-5.1.6 is available as we use it in my company)
> > but without support AFAIK.
> >     
>
>  I've checked. In fact only php-5.1.2 and pear-1.4.6 available on RHEL in
>  the "Red Hat Web Application Stack" channel.
>
>  Remi.
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Fedora-php-devel-list mailing list
>  Fedora-php-devel-list(a)redhat.com
>  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-php-devel-list
>

[Fwd: Re: Pear in EL-4]

[Brandon Holbrook]

Heh, thanks Remi... I didn't even pay attention :)

Remi Collet wrote:
>  Don't understand why this list haven't a "reply-to"
> header like other...
>
>
>  -------- Message original --------
>  Sujet: 	Re: [Fedora-php-devel-list] Pear in EL-4
>  Date: 	Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:43:15 -0500
>  De: 	Brandon Holbrook <fedora(a)theholbrooks.org&gt;
>  Pour :: 	Remi Collet <Fedora(a)FamilleCollet.com&gt;
>  Références: 	<46907AF2.4020606(a)theholbrooks.org&gt;
>  <46912C1F.1060405(a)FamilleCollet.com&gt; <46927A52.5020307(a)FamilleCollet.com&gt;
>
>
>
>  Joe, any comments on building a new php-pear for epel4 that would allow 
>  us to include our existing pear packages?
>
>  -Brandon
>
>  Remi Collet wrote:
>    
> > Remi Collet a écrit :
> >
> >   
> >     
> >> RHEL also provides this in the "Red Hat Web Application Stack" channel
> >> (to be verified, i only see php-5.1.2 and pear-1.4.6 on the beta
> >> channel, but i know php-5.1.6 is available as we use it in my company)
> >> but without support AFAIK.
> >>     
> >>       
> > I've checked. In fact only php-5.1.2 and pear-1.4.6 available on RHEL in
> > the "Red Hat Web Application Stack" channel.
> >
> > Remi.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Fedora-php-devel-list mailing list
> > Fedora-php-devel-list(a)redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-php-devel-list
> >   
> >     
>
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Fedora-php-devel-list mailing list
>  Fedora-php-devel-list(a)redhat.com
>  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-php-devel-list
>

[Fwd: Re: Pear in EL-4]

[Joe Orton]

On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 12:50:48AM -0500, Brandon Holbrook wrote:
>  >Joe, any comments on building a new php-pear for epel4 that would
> allow 
>  >us to include our existing pear packages? 
If you want to maintain in EPEL newer versions any packages which I 
maintain in Fedora/RHEL please just go ahead and do it!

The Stack SRPMs are on ftp.redhat.com somewhere if they would be any use 
(they are effectively backports of Fedora packages to RHEL4).

Regards,

joe

[Fwd: Re: Pear in EL-4]

[Jeff Sheltren]

On Jul 12, 2007, at 12:42 AM, Remi Collet wrote:

>  Don't understand why this list haven't a "reply-to"
> header like  
>  other...
>
>
>  -------- Message original --------
>  Sujet: 	Re: [Fedora-php-devel-list] Pear in EL-4
>  Date: 	Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:43:15 -0500
>  De: 	Brandon Holbrook <fedora(a)theholbrooks.org&gt;
>  Pour :: 	Remi Collet <Fedora(a)FamilleCollet.com&gt;
>  Références: 	<46907AF2.4020606(a)theholbrooks.org&gt;
>  <46912C1F.1060405(a)FamilleCollet.com&gt;  
>  <46927A52.5020307(a)FamilleCollet.com&gt;
>
>
>
>  Joe, any comments on building a new php-pear for epel4 that would  
>  allow
>  us to include our existing pear packages?
>
>  -Brandon
>  
Hi Brandon, the problem is that EPEL has explicitly stated that it  
does not want to replace packages which are already part of RHEL.  See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/ 
GuidelinesAndPolicies#head-5db8a0be339548ee7553b9360071ce7021e8535b

Remi, it may be better to bring this up on epel-devel-list and get a  
definite answer there.

And, yes, I would really love for this list to set a 'reply-to'  
header :)

-Jeff