Fwd: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Change proposal: drop runtime dependency on PEAR

[Remi Collet]

If you don't read the packaging ML, here is a change proposal to drop
dependency on php-pear for all PECL packages.


Remi.


-------- Message transféré --------
Sujet : [Fedora-packaging] Re: [Fedora-php-devel-list] Change proposal:
drop runtime dependency on PEAR
Date : Mon, 25 Jan 2016 16:40:55 +0100
De : Remi Collet <Fedora(a)FamilleCollet.com&gt;
Répondre à : Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for
Fedora <packaging(a)lists.fedoraproject.org&gt;
Copie à : Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora
<packaging(a)lists.fedoraproject.org&gt;

Le 30/11/2015 21:15, Jason L Tibbitts III a écrit :

>  Could you look at setting up file triggers for these so that we can
> drop
>  the scriptlets in rawhide?  I don't understand all of the dependencies
>  and ordering. 
Could you please give a look at

php changes:

http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/php.git/commit/?h=private-drop-pe...

=> define %%pecl_xmldir and own it (/var/lib/php/peclxml)

php-pear changes:

http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/php-pear.git/commit/?h=private-dr...

=> use file triggers for pecl extensions (un)registration
=> define %%pecl_install and %%pecl_uninstall as noop macro

php-pecl-raphf changes (only an example)


http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/php-pecl-raphf.git/commit/?h=priv...

=> drop scriptlets and dependency on php-pecl

Without change, old packages are still ok: old scriplets work.
With a rebuild, take benefit of file triggers.
With change, really drop dependency on php-pear.

> From my tests, everything seems ok, 
But more eyes are welcome.


Remi.
--
packaging mailing list
packaging(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail]