ppc64le: c++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)
by Sérgio Basto
Hello ppc list ,
I don't know where I should report this issue, if this is not the
correct place, please tell me where it is, thanks.
I can't build opencv-3.1 on ppc64le the builds always ends with :
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:36678: Warning: end of file not at end of a line;
newline inserted
{standard input}:39048: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.l295'
{standard input}: Error: open CFI at the end of file; missing
.cfi_endproc directive
c++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla> for instructions.
make[2]: ***
[modules/cvv/CMakeFiles/opencv_cvv.dir/src/view/rawview.cpp.o] Error 4
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
Build logs:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sergiomb/opencv/build/183181/
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sergiomb/opencv/fedora-
23-ppc64le/00183181-opencv/build.log.gz
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sergiomb/opencv/fedora-
rawhide-ppc64le/00181899-opencv/build.log.gz
Best regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
4 years, 6 months
- 4
- 7
Re: [fedora-arm] notifications for Alternative Architecture Excludes
by Sinny Kumari
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 3:05 AM, Dennis Gilmore <dennis(a)ausil.us> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We have been working on a service to create notifications when people add or
> remove ExcludeArch/ExclusiveArch to packages. at the moment they get sent to
> pingu. We can easily send to static email addresses. but we need to know where
> to send them.
>
>
> Longer term I want to get the notifications put into FMN[1] where the arch
> teams will be subscribed to messages just relating to their arches. If someone
> wanted to work on hat it would be awesome.
>
> For right now we need to know where to send them. a good starting point would
> be the arch lists or the overarching one at secondary(a)lists.fp.o or we could
> create a new list architecture-excludes(a)lists.fp.o or perhaps there is a
> better option out there? I wanted to get the discussion started. I personally
> think that a dedicated list is the best option to ensure none of the lists for
> Alternative Arches gets filled up with noise.
Changes in ExcludeArch/ExclusiveArch can happen due to any arches
(all supported arches in Fedora). For example, package foo is currently
ExclusiveArch to x86_64 and now it's been changed to x86_64 and armv7hl
Also gap between secondary and primary arches has been reduced at least in
terms of build (all arches other than s390x gets build in primary koji
since F26).
Considering that, I see two option here:
1. Send email notification to mailing list(s) for which
ExcludeArch/ExclusiveArch has been
changed(added/removed)
2. Create a new ML say architecture-excludes(a)lists.fp.o (as suggested by Dennis)
and send all related notification there.
Among both, I would prefer 2nd option.
6 years, 8 months
- 1
- 0
- ← Newer
- 1
- Older →