Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 21:39 +0000, Andrea wrote:
SDL-devel requires alsa-lib-devel
Foo-devel requires alsa-lib-devel
There's no direct relation between SDL-devel and Foo-devel.
yum remove alsa-lib-devel removes both SDL-devel Foo-devel, since they
both required alsa-lib-devel. yum install SDL-devel only install
SDL-devel and its requirements, which do not include Foo-devel.
Sorry, my case is different
3 packages are installed:
SDL-devel.ppc64
SDL-devel.ppc
alsa-lib-devel.ppc64
alsa-lib-devel.ppc is NOT installed
For sure SDL-devel.ppc64 depends on alsa-lib-devel.ppc64.
The I have to guess that SDL-devel.ppc depends on alsa-lib-devel.ppc64 too. (a bit strange
though)
Otherwise I could not be installed.
Then I remove alsa-lib-devel.ppc64 and yum removes
alsa-lib-devel.ppc64
SDL-devel.ppc64
SDL-devel.ppc
Then when I install SDL-devel.ppc, yum installs
SDL-devel.ppc
alsa-lib-devel.ppc
So it looks like alsa-lib-devel.ppc and alsa-lib-devel.ppc64 are equivalent (for yum).
That is not possible since
/usr/lib/libasound.so is only part of ppc version
/usr/lib64/libasound.so is only part of ppc64 version.
...