While I was reviewing python-pypdf [1] I noticed that the produced rpm (python3-pypdf) does not contain the license file, that is "rpm -q --licensefiles" comes up empty.
As far as I can tell the package follows the example spec file [2] which does not feature an explicit %license tag so I guess the %pyproject macros are supposed to pick these up automatically?
As for python-pypdf, the license file IS present in Python's dist-info directory.
The release tarball uses pyproject.toml with the following line:
license = { file = "LICENSE" }
Am I misunderstanding something here or could this be a shortcoming in the current macros?
Felix
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279080 [2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_example_s...