On Nov 17, 2015 6:06 AM, "Nick Coghlan" <ncoghlan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 17 November 2015 at 23:25, Neal Gompa <ngompa13@gmail.com> wrote:
> > As for naming, I'm all ears for a better name, because if the "egg"
> > name is going away, I'd rather it not continue to say that.
>
> My suggestions would be either:
>
>     python2dist(name)/python3dist(name)
>
I'd favor this form due to the import names conflict that Nick mentions (not that I think anyone will code an auto generator that uses import names once this is accepted.. this seems good enough to carry the day.)

One thing I would change, though: instead of python2dist(name) use python2.7dist(name).  A module built for python 2.7 won't be able to import a module built for python2.6 (the python interpreter won't look in the directories in which the files are placed) so without both the major.minor numbers we won't be able to rely on the auto generated requires in the spec file.

-Toshio