On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 13.9.2016 19:27, Dhanesh Bhalchandra Sabane wrote:
> Aloha Python-SIG!
> I was wondering whether it is a good time to make the new pages official.
> Also, I would like to know whether the idea of splitting the SIG into two
> FAS groups is acceptable so that we can start taking necessary actions.
Yes and yes.
CommOps is currently working on the Python SIG On-Boarding ticket  and
>> one of the tasks
>> we have identified is re-writing the Python SIG wiki page to make it more
>> beginner-friendly. I was assigned with this particular task which is now
>> complete  .
>> We received some feedback from mhroncok today during the CommOps
>> meeting and following
>> points were discussed:
>> 1. Splitting Python SIG in two FAS groups:
>> 1.1 *python-sig* for newcomers and interested members who hang out and
>> help with Python on
>> 1.2 *python-packagers* for proven members of the community / packagers
>> who will also
>> receive security-related bugs. Promising members from *python-sig* group
>> can be promoted
>> to *python-packagers* given that they have contributed to the package's
This will make the intent much clearer :)