The policy doesn't make sense in the example I quoted if you read
the
comments. Look where it says upgrade to 0.9.2beta3 yet the example
shows beta2.
I already told you that you need to bump the release to if you want beta3 to
upgrade beta2. This is for good reason.
I can see that what is trying to be done is to add extra numerics
just
to make the numerics significant and then basically you can ignore the
beta, alpha, etc. But this is more confusing than helpful and its not
necessary to make things lexically ordered.
Actually not totally true, b comes after a, so an alpha package with the same
release integer as a beta package would be upgraded by the beta package.
The goal is proper lexical ordering so that rpm/yum is happy and
packages will upgrade correctly. And either form accomplishes this.
Yet the policy says dots and the policy applies to over 10000 packages already
built in the Fedora and RHEL / CentOS repos.
--
Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) <rudd-o(a)rudd-o.com>
Rudd-O.com -
http://rudd-o.com/
GPG key ID 0xC8D28B92 at
http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/
And we heard him exclaim
As he started to roam:
"I'm a hologram, kids,
please don't try this at home!'"
-- Bob Violence