Hello maintainers,
We'd like to add all the Fedora's packages (co-)maintained by @python-packagers-sig and the members of Python-maint team to the Zuul CI* configuration.
You can see the full list of added packages in this PR: https://pagure.io/fedora-project-config/pull-request/227
I intend to have this PR open for a week and merge the changes after *October 24th*. If you object to having your package enlisted in the Zuul CI, please leave a comment in the PR and I'll remove it.
(For completeness' sake) If you'd like to have your package added to the Zuul CI and it's not listed, you can either leave a comment in the PR or just go ahead and open another one.
Happy packaging! Karolina
-- *Zuul CI not only performs a scratch build of your package, but also runs and reports a handful of other inspections: rpmlint, rpminspect, installation test and other tests, if present. It's especially beneficial if you use the Pull Request workflow in the Fedora's dist-git.
On Tue Oct 18, 2022 at 15:18 +0200, Karolina Surma wrote:
Hello maintainers,
We'd like to add all the Fedora's packages (co-)maintained by @python-packagers-sig and the members of Python-maint team to the Zuul CI* configuration.
You can see the full list of added packages in this PR: https://pagure.io/fedora-project-config/pull-request/227
I intend to have this PR open for a week and merge the changes after *October 24th*. If you object to having your package enlisted in the Zuul CI, please leave a comment in the PR and I'll remove it.
(For completeness' sake) If you'd like to have your package added to the Zuul CI and it's not listed, you can either leave a comment in the PR or just go ahead and open another one.
Happy packaging! Karolina
-- *Zuul CI not only performs a scratch build of your package, but also runs and reports a handful of other inspections: rpmlint, rpminspect, installation test and other tests, if present. It's especially beneficial if you use the Pull Request workflow in the Fedora's dist-git.
Hi Karolina,
Thank you for working on this! I have also found Zuul useful, but I don't always remember to enable it for my packages. I have two suggestions. 1) It looks like some other lines were rearranged as part of this change. Would it be possible to make that a separate change? 2) I would include a list of affected maintainers (this can be generated with [1]) and perhaps CC devel@ for increased visibility.
[1]: https://pagure.io/fedora-misc-package-utilities/blob/master/f/find-package-m...
-- Best,
Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His
On 10/19/22 04:33, Maxwell G wrote:
Hi Karolina,
Thank you for working on this! I have also found Zuul useful, but I don't always remember to enable it for my packages. I have two suggestions 1) It looks like some other lines were rearranged as part of this change. Would it be possible to make that a separate change?
Hi Maxwell,
There are two commits in the PR - one that only sorts the existing entries: https://pagure.io/fork/ksurma/fedora-project-config/c/e8a9bfea2c084235bd84d2...
- one that only adds the new packages: https://pagure.io/fork/ksurma/fedora-project-config/c/4b7c2f710393d18f38594a... - that's pretty much the one of interest.
I was hoping this would make the diff clearer, but I must admit, for over 700 packages it's not that visible. Which leads me to point 2. :)
2)
I would include a list of affected maintainers (this can be generated with [1]) and perhaps CC devel@ for increased visibility.
That's a good idea - I will send the e-mail shortly.
-- Best,
Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His
python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Karolina Surma -
Maxwell G