#422: dev instance sync is erroring out with bugzillacookie issues
--------------------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: tflink | Owner: tflink
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 20
Component: Blocker bug tracker page | Version:
Keywords: | Blocked By:
Blocking: |
--------------------------------------+------------------------
= bug description =
when the cron scheduled sync runs, it errors out when it can't read the
bugzillacookie file. I thought that we got rid of all the bugzillacookie
references with the fix to #414, so I'm not sure what's going on here.
Filing an issue so it doesn't get lost - this needs to be fixed before we
can release a new version.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/422>
Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa>
Fedora Quality Assurance
mkrizek created this task.
mkrizek claimed this task.
mkrizek added a subscriber: mkrizek.
mkrizek added a project: blockerbugs
TASK DESCRIPTION
The task here is to add support for automatic documentation deployment. There is an existing tool for deploying docs generated by sphinx [1] that might be worth looking into. Support for jenkins [2] seems to be missing as of now but is listed as something that will be done in the future. Other thing that needs figuring out is a location of the docs.
[1] https://github.com/teracy-official/sphinx-deployment
[2] http://jenkins.cloud.fedoraproject.org/job/blockerbugs/
TASK DETAIL
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T22
To: mkrizek
Cc: qa-devel, mkrizek
tflink created this task.
tflink assigned this task to mkrizek.
tflink added a subscriber: tflink.
tflink added a project: blockerbugs
TASK DESCRIPTION
Earlier today, we got a report of the production app throwing 503 errors but the errors went away shortly after. At first glance, it appears that the user in question was logged in at the time and at approximately the same time, the following error showed up on blockerbugs02:
Nov 20 15:30:58 blockerbugs02 app 2013-11-20 15:30:58 ERROR Exception on /admin/ [GET]#012Traceback (most recent call last):#012 File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/flask/app.py", line 1687, in wsgi_app#012 response = self.full_dispatch_request()#012 File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/flask/app.py", line 1360, in full_dispatch_request#012 rv = self.handle_user_exception(e)#012 File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/flask/app.py", line 1358, in full_dispatch_request#012 rv = self.dispatch_request()#012 File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/flask/app.py", line 1344, in dispatch_request#012 return self.view_functions[rule.endpoint](**req.view_args)#012 File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/flask_admin/base.py", line 49, in inner#012 abort = self._handle_view(f.__name__, **kwargs)#012 File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/blockerbugs/controllers/admin/__init__.py", line 43, in _handle_view#012 return check_admin_rights()#012 File
"/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/blockerbugs/controllers/users.py", line 52, in check_admin_rights#012 return fas.login()#012 File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/flask_fas_openid.py", line 129, in login#012 if 'next' in args.values:#012NameError: global name 'args' is not defined
I suspect that something may be mishandled with login when the load balancer sends traffic to the node on which the user did not login initially, but this is just a suspicion - the issue still needs triage.
TASK DETAIL
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T19
To: mkrizek, tflink
Cc: qa-devel, tflink
jskladan changed the title from "generate specially crafted rpms to induce failure and passing in rpmlint" to "generate specially crafted rpms to induce failure and passing in upgradepath".
jskladan edited the task description.
TASK DETAIL
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T14
To: jskladan
Cc: qa-devel, tflink
jskladan changed the title from "generate specially crafted rpms to induce failure and passing in depcheck" to "generate specially crafted rpms to induce failure and passing in rpmlint".
jskladan edited the task description.
TASK DETAIL
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T14
To: jskladan
Cc: qa-devel, tflink
tflink added a comment.
yeah, one of them was supposed to be for upgradepath. Can you change the title of one of them depending on which task you were intending to take?
TASK DETAIL
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T16
To: jskladan, tflink
Cc: qa-devel, tflink, jskladan
jskladan added a subscriber: jskladan.
jskladan added a comment.
just a note - is this a duplicate of T14 or is it merely a typo and this ticket (or the other one) should be upgradepath-centric?
TASK DETAIL
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T16
To: jskladan
Cc: qa-devel, tflink, jskladan