From: "Tim Flink" tflink@redhat.com I'm still leaning towards the no-cloud option, mostly because I really don't want to get into openstack deployment management. Yes, there is a fedora infra managed instance of openstack but I also think assuming we would never have to help fix/improve that deployment is a bit on the naive side. The other big advantages in my mind are that the no-cloud approach makes the local execution much closer to the production execution model and we'd be much closer to enabling stuff like gnome's test suite.
I'd appreciate thoughts from other folks on which route they think is a better approach.
From the Beaker side, one of the big reasons we went down the path of providing the "virt/image-install" task is because we don't yet have an ETA on when we'll drop the "experimental" tag from our OpenStack integration. So unless you have a particularly compelling need to do multi-host test orchestration, sticking with virt guests on a single host sounds like a good option to me.
The other thing that may potentially let you do is IPv6-only testing of your guests, even if nothing else on your network supports IPv6-only operation.
Cheers, Nick.