Re: To RHEL or Not to RHEL?

[Martin Krizek]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tim Flink" 
> To: [e-mail]
> Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2015 8:05:04 PM
> Subject: To RHEL or Not to RHEL?

...snip...
> While virt-in-virt is possible, I'd prefer to avoid the extra
> complexity and performance penalty and figure that running on bare
> metal makes more sense. If we disable local task execution, there
> should be little risk of one task disrupting other stuff on that
> virthost that can't be easily reverted.

Does it make sense not to disable local execution on one or more
buildslave? I wonder if some tasks could benefit from not running in
vm. Or it might be waste of resources to run tasks like rpmlint
on a disposable client?

Martin