>>>> "JM" == José Matos writes:
JM> On Tuesday 22 April 2008 18:37:40 Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> I was going to look through the changelog and try to determine
> whether it merited a last minute tag for F-9 or not. Opinions
> welcome.
JM> AFAIK there is nothing so serious that can't wait for F-9
JM> release. Also all modules need to be recompiled, this can be done
JM> best after F-9.
I agree, wait for F-9. Then we can put it through updates-testing,
have time to push dependent packages that might need rebuilding,
including (but probably not limited to) rpy.
Meanwhile we could push versions for F-7 & F-8 to updates-testing to
shake out potential problems. Then push them all to stable after F-9
is released.
Alex