On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 13:23 +0200, pingou wrote:
Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 02:56 -0700, Alex Lancaster wrote:
>
>> I agree, wait for F-9. Then we can put it through updates-testing,
>> have time to push dependent packages that might need rebuilding,
>> including (but probably not limited to) rpy.
>>
>> Meanwhile we could push versions for F-7 & F-8 to updates-testing to
>> shake out potential problems. Then push them all to stable after F-9
>> is released.
>
> Ehhh, i don't want to break the upgrade path. We'll just sit on this
> until after F-9.
>
What about pushing it now ? :)
I have started to look at the new bioconductor release, some of them
will require R >= 2.7.0.
It is now in testing for all active releases (F-7, F-8, F-9):
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F7/pending/rpy-0.4.6-25.fc7,R-2.7...
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/pending/rpy-1.0.1-4.fc8,R-2.7....
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/pending/rpy-1.0.1-6.fc9,R-2.7....
I'm not sure why these haven't pushed yet, I did them several days ago.
~spot