Dear all,
I would like to propose to update (or mention) some points in the R packaging guidelines.
* Mention something about the tex files which are not utf-8 and don't necessarily have to be converted see: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-January/msg00741.html
* Mention something about the -devel package where the headers don't necessarily have to moved to %{_datadir} since R looks for them in %{_libdir}. see: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-r-devel-list/2009-March/msg00001.html
What is your opinion on these changes ?
What is the process to propose such changes/updates ?
Thanks,
Best regards,
Pierre
On Sat, 2009-03-21 at 19:59 +0100, Pierre-Yves wrote:
Dear all,
I would like to propose to update (or mention) some points in the R packaging guidelines.
- Mention something about the tex files which are not utf-8 and don't
necessarily have to be converted see: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-January/msg00741.html
- Mention something about the -devel package where the headers don't
necessarily have to moved to %{_datadir} since R looks for them in %{_libdir}. see: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-r-devel-list/2009-March/msg00001.html
I am planning on writing down a proposal to add those remarks to the guidelines.
In addition I though we could also : - Mention about the version which in R might contains '-' which should be replaced in Fedora - Mention R2spec as tool to create spec file - Mention the new sources of library (the two r-forges)
Do you see any other points to be added/changed ?
I will send to the list the proposal once done.
Best regards,
Pierre
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 18:56 +0200, Pierre-Yves wrote:
On Sat, 2009-03-21 at 19:59 +0100, Pierre-Yves wrote:
Dear all,
I would like to propose to update (or mention) some points in the R packaging guidelines.
- Mention something about the tex files which are not utf-8 and don't
necessarily have to be converted see: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-January/msg00741.html
- Mention something about the -devel package where the headers don't
necessarily have to moved to %{_datadir} since R looks for them in %{_libdir}. see: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-r-devel-list/2009-March/msg00001.html
I am planning on writing down a proposal to add those remarks to the guidelines.
In addition I though we could also :
- Mention about the version which in R might contains '-' which should
be replaced in Fedora
- Mention R2spec as tool to create spec file
- Mention the new sources of library (the two r-forges)
Do you see any other points to be added/changed ?
I put all this together here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ProposalUpdateRGuidelines and also there thus: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/DraftsTodo
I put target date as 'Discuss' waiting to hear from you but there is a meeting tomorrow if we make it on time :)
Feel free to react of it :)
Best regards,
Pierre
r-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org