#866: Give legal heads up on Preview release
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Reporter: jkeating | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: Fedora 10 Preview | Component: other
Keywords: |
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Email legal to make sure they are aware of the Alpha release and can file
any paperwork necessary.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/866>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
#955: Need Cobbler 1.2.8 reinstated in 8/9 updates as opposed to 1.2.7 (bhodi
push order error)
---------------------+------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: mdehaan | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: other
Keywords: |
---------------------+------------------------------------------------------
Bhodi has pushed one of my packages (built a day later) out of order and I
can't fix them through Bhodi. Here's the associated bhodi ticket that
contains the full details:
https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/260#preview
1.2.7 contains a rather serious bug, so if a manual fix can be applied to
get 1.2.8 to be available in updates, that would be great.
Let me know if that's not possible and I need to do something else.
(rel-eng ticked opened based on Mike McGrath's advice)
Thanks!
--Michael
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/955>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
#948: fedora-business-cards-0.2.1-1.fc10 in f10-final
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: ianweller | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: Fedora 10 Final | Component: koji
Keywords: |
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Could I get fedora-business-cards-0.2.1-1.fc10 tagged for f10-final?
Wanted to have this available in current rawhide and at F10 release.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/948>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
#937: Please include system-config-date-1.9.33-1.fc10 in F10 final
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: nphilipp | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: koji
Keywords: |
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Unfortunately I missed the freeze on Tuesday (vacation the week before,
backlog) and therefore didn't get the latest translations into the
package. On top of that I fixed requirements. It would be good to get the
package in to have the most up to date translations in the Live media.
I've tested the package locally and haven't seen it malfunctioning.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/937>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
#960: final freeze exception request (cluster)
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: fabbione | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: koji
Keywords: |
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Package n-v-r: cluster-2_99_12-1_fc10
Description: new upstream release to fix several security issues
discovered after running a code audit. Details of the issues can be found
here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469338
Rationale: would be nice to ship with it. Tho it can go in as part of
updates. It will spare the troubles of issuing a security update later on.
Impact: the upstream source is sensible to several symlinks attack by
default. It doesn't lead to privilege escalation but a normal user could
easily make a DoS on the system.
Testing: we did run the usual test suite before releasing from upstream.
Install/remove rpm, run, form a cluster, etc. Verified one by one that all
the security changes did not introduce regressions or behaviour changes.
Thanks
Fabio
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/960>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
#949: f10-final tag request: kdepimlibs-4.1.2-4.fc10
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Reporter: kkofler | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: Fedora 10 Preview | Component: koji
Keywords: |
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
So it turns out that my last-minute change to make kdepimlibs use the
system libical (using a patch backported from the KDE 4.2 trunk) was a bad
idea, it causes crashes in KOrganizer:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469228
That change will need more debugging before it is ready for production
use, and it is too late for that for f10-final, so I see reverting as the
best option.
This build (kdepimlibs-4.1.2-4.fc10) reverts kdepimlibs to how it was like
in 4.1.2-2.fc10 (i.e. it makes it use the bundled libical, which is
unfortunately the only one supported in KDE 4.1), so it effectively undoes
the tagging of 4.1.2-3.fc10 (but I had to bump and rebuild for upgrade
paths).
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/949>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
#952: taxipilot.i386 is wrongly included in x86_64 repo
-------------------------------------------------+--------------------------
Reporter: Alexey Torkhov <atorkhov(a)gmail.com> | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Type: defect | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: other
Keywords: |
-------------------------------------------------+--------------------------
taxipilot.i386 is included in x86_64 repo. This is probably wrong.
Could it happen because it includes .la file? (Bug reported on it -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469518)
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/952>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
#956: Tag coreutils-6.12-17.fc10 for f10-final
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: ovasik | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: Fedora 10 Final | Component: koji
Keywords: |
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Current f10-final coreutils package lacks Requires: ncurses (those
Requirements were before in bash I guess). As reported in rh bz#469277 ,
it causes troubles with (at least) tcsh, producing error message due to
tput command usage in colorls shell scripts.
I would like to have coreutils-6.12-17.fc10 tagged for f10-final , the
only change is addition of Requires: ncurses .
Thanks in advance.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/956>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
#959: push sectool-0_9_1-3 to dist-f10
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Reporter: pvrabec(a)redhat.com | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: koji
Keywords: |
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
dear Release Engineering,
could you move sectool-0_9_1-3 from dist-f10-updates-candidate to
dist-f10, please. We have discovered some issues, that are fixed now.
Fixing(bz #469368). No other packages are affected.
thnx.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/959>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project